logo Sign In

Info Wanted: Giorgio Moroder presents "Metropolis" - is it any good? (lots of info)

Author
Time
 (Edited)

I just got the US BD of Giorgio Moroders Metropolis Version. Some years ago I found the following website http://www.morodermetropolisdvd.com/ with a “fan made” redux Version of Giorgio Moroder’s Version. Sadly just avaible outside europe.

Has someon that disc, and could tell if its a well done edition? It seems to be a bit more colorised than the original Moroder Version.

"I kill Gandalf." - Igor, Dork Tower

Author
Time

What's wrong with the BluRay?

This signature uses Markdown syntax, which makes it easy to add formatting like italics, bold, and lists:

Author
Time

It's nothing wrong with it. (Except its region A coded :) )

I just want to know, if that so called "redux" version does have other way colorized scenes. Or other differences from the original moroder Version. If not, I am very happy with the BD. But IF there are differences, like its different colorized, its something about collecting. The original Moroder seems to be just colored in one color per scene (like the colorized Version of Murneaus Nosferatu) while the "Redux" seem to have some multi colored scenes. But its hard to tell without the redux version on hands, just the two pictures on the site mentioned in the first post...

"I kill Gandalf." - Igor, Dork Tower

Author
Time

MrBrown said:

The original Moroder seems to be just colored in one color per scene (like the colorized Version of Murneaus Nosferatu) while the "Redux" seem to have some multi colored scenes.

 The original has some multi-colored scenes too (like during the creation of Hel). From what I've seen, the Redux is supposed to be exactly like the original (only sourced from the remastered Kino version), but of course it isn't 100% perfect.

This signature uses Markdown syntax, which makes it easy to add formatting like italics, bold, and lists:

Author
Time

There was "Metropolis: Morodered", and I believe that one is an LD transfer of the original Moroder version. I don't have that one.

However, I do have a copy of the "Metropolis Redux" version. The benefit of the Redux was that it colorized the early 2000's restoration, so there was better definition than the Moroder bootlegs flying around.

Now owning a copy of the 2010 reconstruction on blu-ray (and looking to get another region's release for the sake of completeness, in terms of extras), I'd be curious to see if the colour could be lifted and applied to the high-resolution blu-ray transfer with minimal effort. Judging by the disc's creator's elaboration on his method... I'm guessing it would be a considerable effort.

To contact me outside the forum, for trades and such my email address is my OT.com username @gmail.com

Author
Time

klokwerk said:

There was "Metropolis: Morodered", and I believe that one is an LD transfer of the original Moroder version. I don't have that one.

I have an LD preservation of the Moroder version, but that wasn't the name of it. Looks like the BluRay is prettymuch the same, but also looks like a bit of restoration went on, judging from these screenshots: http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Giorgio-Moroder-Presents-Metropolis-Blu-ray/28183/#Screenshots

There aren't any shots of the "creation", but you can see from this one shot that they did retain the multicolored segments: http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/screenshot.php?movieid=28183&position=7

klokwerk said:

...I'd be curious to see if the colour could be lifted and applied to the high-resolution blu-ray transfer with minimal effort.

I still don't understand why you guys want to do this. To me, it makes as much sense as using a perfectly transferred BluRay version of the OUT (hypothetically) to reconstruct Harmy's Despecialized.

This signature uses Markdown syntax, which makes it easy to add formatting like italics, bold, and lists:

Author
Time

For me it was just interessting, if the reconstructed, redux version is something more different from the BD. I am a bit of a collector of movies and different Versions.

 

"I kill Gandalf." - Igor, Dork Tower

Author
Time

I wouldn't mind seeing a fan edit where the recently recovered footage was put in where Moroder only had stills to work with.

The Blu Ray is wonderful. The only nitpick I have is the Producer's Sales Organization logo on the end credits has been removed. The credit roll freezes at the end before it would appear. This will only be obvious to those who have the old Vestron Video release burned into the brain though. ;)

Thought I saw a familiar fan editor's name on the disc credits too. The Video Savant review claims the trailer on the disc is a recreation.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time
 (Edited)

I've got a PAL copy of version 1.0 of redux lying around somewhere on dvd. But it's quite a while ago I watched it. I'll look it up.

If memory serves me right, the redux version mimics Moroders version als close as possible. Maybe with a little less colour bleed in the multicolour shots. It also uses different takes for certain parts of the movie because the later restoration used some different takes than Moroder did.

Edit: I just found this on Youtube. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEA4bNWkHJE It shows some of the changes made for redux.

A new release of Star Wars is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you're gonna get.

Author
Time

Thanks, that video was quiete informative. So for collecting sake, it would make sense to get hands on that redux version.

"I kill Gandalf." - Igor, Dork Tower

Author
Time

Ooh! I love this version of Metropolis. Sorry but ever since I saw it, it has a special place in my heart for its wonderful corniness. Freddie Mercury and Pat Benetar on the same soundtrack is great. Forgive me but what I have to say is mostly a reiteration of what has been said:

I tend to watch Redux more often than the Blu-Ray. It's a fan recreation using a modern restoration, so it looks gorgeous. Some of the color effects look slightly better than what Moroder could achieve, but it blends with the higher quality remastered video. The audio is all right on this one... nothing special. There's a watermark at the bottom if you watch it with underscan but it doesn't detract from the viewing experience. From what I understand, the fan who made this version put quite a bit of effort into it. It's a very excellent result and should be used for general viewing (comparable to a reconstruction like Despecialized). This is available on TEHPARADOX by the way in two places.

The Blu-Ray does have its merits. It is completely faithful to what was seen back in the 1980's: warts and all. Moroder could not do a thorough picture/visual restoration and many details are obscured by high contrast and not so good film materials. A 35mm print is the best source for this. I'm glad it appeared to be a relatively straight transfer: no DVNR or anything... I respect Kino's decision in this matter. There's less picture info on the sides than Redux I believe. This would be equivalent to having a straight 35mm transfer of SW (if there were no other film materials surviving).

It is worth saying that those are the only versions I feel are necessary. All the VHS and LD boots are basically far lower quality versions of the Blu-Ray. They're not different AFAIK. The reconstruction called Metropolis: Morodered on Preserv was unfortunately, IMHO, not as good as Redux. It attempted to make a version like the Moroder's Cut but was culled from a lower quality restoration and wasn't as impressive.... Sorry.

Anyway, that's just my two cents about everything.

Author
Time

I just got a DVD5 of the Redux Version. I did not watch it completely, yet, but for the few minutes I watched, I have to say, that it is a great Version.

The comentary subtitle is very informative, and it is a real good addition to my US BD of the Moroder Version and the UK BD of the reconstructed Lang Version.

Very interresting that the different Sources of the moroder Version had different color tinting intensities...

Thanks for your help with informations...

"I kill Gandalf." - Igor, Dork Tower

Author
Time

I was going to start a new post for this but as this topic closely related, I'll ask it here.

I'm a huge fan of Metropolis, I bought the complete version when it first came out and I recently picked up the Moroder version.  After watching it, it kind of sparked my interest in trying to collect some of the other versions from over the years, but I'm really confused about the content of all the different versions that exist.  Some seem to be the same cuts as others only with different sound tracks while others are entirely different cuts.  And to make matters more complicated, the versions I see listed on amazon, don't seem to give any indication of which version they are.  Are these versions all the original US cuts or do different distributors have different cuts?  Is the UFA re-cut available?

Is there a comprehensive history of the films different version and releases somewhere on the web?

I know obtaining every cut imaginable is probably impossible given the crazy history of the film, but getting my hands on the major ones would be nice. 

Any help sorting out this mess would be much appreciated.

"George, we hate you for making more Star Wars movies.  Please make more Star Wars movies."

-The Internet

Author
Time

Keep in mind there are a lot of crappy public domain versions around. (Some going all the way back to the early days of VHS.) Many of these play fast and loose with the intertitles and are missing a lot of footage.

I even saw a version the SciFi channel cobbled together and ran a few times in the 90's. The score sounded like a Casiotone keyboard or something. (They even had the balls to copyright it!) It was an awful thing to look at, especially after seeing Moroder's version.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

I've read a summary of the history of the films from wikipedia, a few other websites, and the booklet included with The Complete Metropolis. 

From what I understand.  There were 3 main versions of the film that were cut after the Berlin premiere.  They were the US cut, the British cut, and the German re-cut.  All three of these cuts where similar but not identical. 

So the first thing I want to know is are these 3 cuts the same cuts that are available in the public domain copies or are they all further butchered.  Was there a common score associated with these re-cuts or that are available or do all these public domain versions just use whatever score they want.

Furthermore, I've read about there being several attempts to restore the film.  The first was in the late sixties I believe and gathered all the footage together but didn't have the title cards or original music cues needed to properly reconstruct the the editing sequence.

Then, after Moroder's version, it reads that Enno Patalas made a new restoration in 1987 using newly discovered title cards and original score music.

But then flash forward to 1998-2001 and we get the new restoration that was released in 2002 that seems to draw from that exact same material from the Enno Patalas restoration.

So I guess my real questions are, is the 1987 Patalas restoration the same as the 2002 restoration, or an earlier draft of the same restoration, or something entirely different.  And what about the 1968 restoration?  Are these versions available?

And what about the original re-cuts.  Are these available in their original form?  What was the story that they cobbled together in these re-cuts.  From what I read, Moroder's version was the first to actually reconstruct the original story structure.  So what were the others like then?  What's the significance of Moroder's version in the grand scheme of Metropolis's history?  What versions are these public domain prints? 

So much confusion.

"George, we hate you for making more Star Wars movies.  Please make more Star Wars movies."

-The Internet

Author
Time
 (Edited)

 

Darth Bizarro said:

So I guess my real questions are, is the 1987 Patalas restoration the same as the 2002 restoration, or an earlier draft of the same restoration, or something entirely different.

They are different. The 2002 restoration is much improved with more material.

And what about the 1968 restoration?

I assume you mean the 1978 BBC restoration with electronic sound. While it is not available through any of the public domain DVDs since it is official BBC, a guy is bootlegging it here at IMDB:

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0017136/board/nest/186173768

It could be interesting since it's realistic motion speed. Towards the end of the thread, he even goes as far as to offer a copy for absolutely free... If anyone makes contact with him, it could be an interesting copy to share around the forum...

 

And what about the original re-cuts.  Are these available in their original form?

I'm not sure about the British and French Cut, but the American Cut has definitely been transferred. I believe the public domain versions usually are slightly longer than the heavily trimmed American Cut. A man who does several releases based off of relatively good quality 16mm transfers is selling a copy of the 94 minute American Cut:

http://reelclassicdvd.com/silent_era.htm

Just keep scrolling and you'll find it.

What was the story that they cobbled together in these re-cuts.  From what I read, Moroder's version was the first to actually reconstruct the original story structure.  So what were the others like then?

No idea. I believe they just cobbled certain scenes in a hard to follow fashion. Moroder's version tried to restore a plot, even at the expense of cutting scenes which were no longer intelligible to other cut material unavailable at the time.

What's the significance of Moroder's version in the grand scheme of Metropolis's history?

Moroder's version revived interest heavily in Metropolis. By doing a theatrical release, he inspired a new generation to try to preserve Metropolis. His... interesting... score also helped to attract the masses. More Metropolis restorations followed afterwards, with more footage being discovered.

What versions are these public domain prints? 

These versions I believe are slightly extended from the US Cut. They run around 115-122 minutes, so they definitely have some material. They can be sourced from 16mm prints, normally in rubbish quality. The link here gives a good run-down on all DVDs, including public domain versions:

http://www.silentera.com/video/metropolisHV.html

I would recommend the site above. They list the releases of many silent films. Hope some of this helps...

Author
Time

Wow...

i'm really sorry to exhume this thread, guys, but i really have to thank you. I was about to open a new thread , then, i found this.I didn't know that there's also a BD version of Moroder's Metropolis! You have enlightened me!

I already own the Redux version and an old Laserdisc rip... Metropolis Redux is an awsome project and i really love it, but the idea of owning a version that is closer to the original is very tempting.

Thanks again! I will definitely buy it...

Author
Time

doctorstrangelove said:

I already own the Redux version and an old Laserdisc rip... Metropolis Redux is an awsome project and i really love it, but the idea of owning a version that is closer to the original is very tempting.

Thanks again! I will definitely buy it...

Just a warning, the Blu-Ray by Kino may not meet all your expectations. It's culled from an original 1980s 35mm print with little to no clean-up. The elements Moroder was working from were far inferior to those used in the modern day restorations. 

Because Redux uses the 21st century restored video, it actually looks much higher quality than the Blu-Ray. I'd only get the Blu-Ray if I was interested in how people saw the Moroder cut in the 1980s, warts and all. 

Author
Time

As I've said before, it would be neat to see the recovered footage used where Moroder had to use still photos.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

The recent UK Region B release of Metropolis includes not only the 2010 reconstructed version but also Moroder's version. I own it and can vouch for the extras listed:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Metropolis-Ultimate-Collectors-SteelBook-Blu-ray/dp/B00Q8LDNFO/ref=sr_1_2?s=dvd&ie=UTF8&qid=1436361862&sr=1-2&keywords=metropolis+blu+ray

The quality of Moroder's version is, IMHO, first generation VHS of a used silent-era film.  As The Aluminum Falcon pointed out, the elements used in Moroder's version were far inferior.

Author
Time

SilverWook said:

As I've said before, it would be neat to see the recovered footage used where Moroder had to use still photos.

You'd have to come up with a bunch of new songs, though. That's a -lot- of extra footage we're talking about.

This signature uses Markdown syntax, which makes it easy to add formatting like italics, bold, and lists:

Author
Time

InvisibleWolfMan said:

The recent UK Region B release of Metropolis includes not only the 2010 reconstructed version but also Moroder's version. I own it and can vouch for the extras listed:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Metropolis-Ultimate-Collectors-SteelBook-Blu-ray/dp/B00Q8LDNFO/ref=sr_1_2?s=dvd&ie=UTF8&qid=1436361862&sr=1-2&keywords=metropolis+blu+ray

The quality of Moroder's version is, IMHO, first generation VHS of a used silent-era film.  As The Aluminum Falcon pointed out, the elements used in Moroder's version were far inferior.

 Oh, thanks for the Info's. Seems to be a very interesting release.

"I kill Gandalf." - Igor, Dork Tower

Author
Time

The Aluminum Falcon said:

doctorstrangelove said:

I already own the Redux version and an old Laserdisc rip... Metropolis Redux is an awsome project and i really love it, but the idea of owning a version that is closer to the original is very tempting.

Thanks again! I will definitely buy it...

Just a warning, the Blu-Ray by Kino may not meet all your expectations. It's culled from an original 1980s 35mm print with little to no clean-up. The elements Moroder was working from were far inferior to those used in the modern day restorations. 

Because Redux uses the 21st century restored video, it actually looks much higher quality than the Blu-Ray. I'd only get the Blu-Ray if I was interested in how people saw the Moroder cut in the 1980s, warts and all. 

 However better than laserdisc rip, i think...

@SilverWook, Asaki: can you imagine a new version of Metropolis created using all the footage available now, with new colours, sound effects, dubbed characters and a music score spanning from classic to electronic, from pop to heavy metal, from... Ok, fellas. You can kill me now.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Asaki said:

SilverWook said:

As I've said before, it would be neat to see the recovered footage used where Moroder had to use still photos.

You'd have to come up with a bunch of new songs, though. That's a -lot- of extra footage we're talking about.

 My initial thought was to cut the footage to fit Moroder's pacing. Extending the existing songs shouldn't be that hard to do, and there's other Moroder and Queen songs that might work for scenes that didn't exist in still form back in '84.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?