logo Sign In

Info: About this whole Indy 4 debate.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Come on, ok their was an alien and a spacecraft in the film, alot of you have an issue with it…but…

ROTLA: Spirits come out of a pile of dust and melt your face off.

TOD: Voodoo Dolls and demonic possession.

TLC: 600 year old Knight just kicking back waiting for some Grail fanatics.

Ok, well maybe you can redit Indy 4  to “Indiana Jones and the Tupac album after he’s been dead 3 years.”

No offense to fan edits, but it really isnt that bad guys. 😉

Author
Time
 (Edited)

 

First, sorry for my english...

I don't hate Indy 4. I think it is enjoyable. Well, at least it don't put me asleep like when I am trying to watch Crusade for the 40 times... Dare I say I prefer to watch Indy 4 than 3 these days? Yes, I think. (Maybe it is just because it's new...)

It has some "TOD over the top" in it, and I truely love TOD.

That said, I think that movie could have been X10 better. It's not the SF vs religion thing, it's not even the CGI vs practical effects thing, it is that I find Indy too passive in this movie. 

And it is so obvious that this movie is a compromise between Lucas and Spielberg visions. The movie tells us that right on the opening scene, with the 50's "american graffiti" car full of young folks that wants to have fun (Lucas...) and the serious tone of the army guys (Spielberg). I think the movie had no real vision from the begining, it was just a way for the 3 men (+ Ford)  to have fun again (and some say to make more dollars, but I think they all are rich enough not to think that way, of course I may be wrong).

The script was good enough to make a fun ride with a well known character that I am pleased to watch again. But it don't really make you feel part of the movie, sharing the adventure with Indy, like the first 2 (Oh shit, I felt asleep during Crusade once again!)

I think it don't deserved all that hate. But it is far from being a masterpiece. And with Spielberg making a fourth after saying for years that three is enough, we had the right to wait for more than this.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

You said it best when you said "have fun again".

So Lucas, Spielberg and Ford made one last flick. Campy and unbelievable are there for a reason...because movies are meant to be that way sometimes.

If you wanted a documentary of refrigerators falling from 20,000 feet and tumbling, then go rent one.

I'm calling FRIGIDARE and asking the possibility of it happening just to shut people up.

Movies are made of fantasy, and when people start barking at the fact it is, it ruins it for all of us.

 

Author
Time

Indiana Jones IV was the single biggest piece of crap i have seen in Cinemas since the prequels.   But the Clone Wars 2008 movie was even worse.  Seriously Crystal Numbskulls is Spielbergs Worst film since 1941 or Temple of Doom.

George Lucas and Steven Spielberg should retire as they cannot make good films anymore, i gave Speilberg another chance after War of the Worlds but after Indy IV i will never pay to see a single film he ever makes again and the same for Lucas.

2 of my Fave youtube pieces on the subject

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CPzDjaA03ts&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H8ETYG0nmAo&feature=related

I know this bottom one is star wars related but is still relevent because of Lucas

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wzDIClx-_pY

“Always loved Vader’s wordless self sacrifice. Another shitty, clueless, revision like Greedo and young Anakin’s ghost. What a fucking shame.” -Simon Pegg.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

ummmmm....agggrhhhhhhhh

THE ONLY reason people make these videos is because they know they appeal to the uber nerd mentality of the anti-prequels and such.

"I got 65,000 hits from my video of me killing Lucas and Jar Jar with a lightsaber...guffaw for me!!!!"

Ok, anyway...some of the nice fellas in here who I do not want to offend are talking about editing The Dark Knight and Godfather 2.

This site was meant to be a place where Star Wars fans could have a nice cozy edit that did not suck. Now everyone and their mom wants to redo every thing that has passed through the motion picture world.

Leave it alone already,

"I don't think that rosebud being a sled works, let's all edit. I have Adobe Premiere."

 

Author
Time

Lol, but I'd certainly love to see a slightly 'goofy gopher'-less, slightly 'monkey business'-less, 'overly-bouncing fridge'-free version of this Indy movie!  (with better colouration than was released....)

Author
Time
 (Edited)

The extra-dimensional-alien-fying-saucer aspect of the movie irritated some of my friends because "Indiana Jones is about the supernatural and relics, not aliens and UFOs" but I watched so much "In Search Of ..." when I was a kid, with the ancient astronauts and Erich Von Daniken and Chariots of the Gods and all that, that I didn't bat an eye at that part of it. The movie was far from perfect but I enjoyed it and had a good time, and I liked it more than Temple of Doom.

Having said that, I'm looking forward to seeing a fan edit of it just the same. ïViva variety!

The new screens held!

Author
Time

I don't see the point of this topic.  MCBarkingSpoon, you obviously do not like the idea of fanediting, so why come to a fanediting forum and star flaming the idea?  I don't see anything constructive coming from this.

ThrowgnCpr’s edits on Fanedit.org

Author
Time

I love Adywans fanedits and others as well, just some films are good enough to be left alone.

Do not accuse me of flaming because I have some criticism please.

Anyways that's all I wanted to say really. ;) We can move on.

Author
Time

MCBarkingSpoon said: just some films are good enough to be left alone.

Assuming for the sake of argument that this statement is true, who is it that decides which films should be "left alone"?

Are you declaring yourself the ultimate arbiter of what films may be edited?


If you love a film the way it is, just don't download a fan edit of it. It's a simple solution, and the best part is...it takes no effort whatsoever. Yay!

Author
Time
MCBarkingSpoon said:

I love Adywans fanedits and others as well, just some films are good enough to be left alone.

 

I'd argue that KotCS is bad enough to be left alone - it's so intrinsically weak that no amount of re-editing is likely to save it.

But that's probably not the sort of support you're hoping for.

 

Author
Time

This whole thing started over the Alien thing in the movie, which compared to some of the other things in the films, isn't that over the top.

It's far from anything like the original films were. But nothing that can be saved about it without taking the whole plot out, so its not that bad of a film, but it is a horse with a broken leg, cant fix it.

I AM NOT, and will not get into a war over this.

And I never said I was an arbiter of anything.

Sorry if I offended anyone.

 

 

Author
Time

No man, I think I see what you're getting at.  I mean I love fan edits as much as the next guy, but I've seen some pretty anal comments/suggestions/etc.  I mean, c'mon, cutting out some of Ox's crazy behavior when the man is...crazy?  Huh?  Tracking in musical set pieces from the first three films?  C'mon.   It gets crazy.  Absolutely make the Mutt swinging better.  Explore possibilities for Doom Town (even though I didn't have the major spleen busting reaction that some have).  Make things make more sense.  But it gets to a point where you go beyond just making the film better and it gets excessive or so off in its own way that it makes it pointless.

Two-Face - A Batman:The Animated Series Movie
Author
Time
musicman said:

No man, I think I see what you're getting at.  I mean I love fan edits as much as the next guy, but I've seen some pretty anal comments/suggestions/etc.  I mean, c'mon, cutting out some of Ox's crazy behavior when the man is...crazy?  Huh?  Tracking in musical set pieces from the first three films?  C'mon.   It gets crazy.  Absolutely make the Mutt swinging better.  Explore possibilities for Doom Town (even though I didn't have the major spleen busting reaction that some have).  Make things make more sense.  But it gets to a point where you go beyond just making the film better and it gets excessive or so off in its own way that it makes it pointless.

 

DAMN WELL put,damn well put,I could not agree with you more there musicman,I do edits every now and then to,and I read some of these posts on possible changes and alterings and cuts,and I just cannot believe the arrogance,and Holier than though attitudes I see,damn if these guy's think they are that damn good,why are they NOT making there own movies and making a lot of $,then people on the internet can critique there works and edit to thier satisfaction.

Author
Time

I was talking in the Dark Knight fan edit thread just recently.

I counted and agreed with maybe 2 and a half points, but why would you do an entire movie over for that?

Author
Time

I do edits every now and then to,and I read some of these posts on possible changes and alterings and cuts,and I just cannot believe the arrogance,and Holier than though attitudes I see

I understand your point, but to me there are several kind of fanediting, those done to make the film better (from the point of view of the editor of course), and those made to radicaly transform the movie in "something else", not necesarry better. I like both.

It all depends on what is the goal of the faneditor. If you want to make OX less crazy in your edit, well, why not give it a try? Perhaps it 'll work. I don't see that as a disrespect on Spielberg's work. Unless the faneditor is an arrogant asshole that spit on the original movie all the time in his comments. But then it's an attitude problem, not an editing problem. (I really don't point at anyone, I check the Indy4 thread from time to time, and I usualy like what I read).

 

Author
Time

I AM NOT, and will not get into a war over this.

No one asked you to. This is just a discussion, not a fight. You started the thread...was it to hear other viewpoints, or just to shoot down a (theoretical) fan edit that you don't like the sound of?

For the record, I actually agree that the gigantic, nitpicky list in the Indy 4 thread is a but silly, but it's not hurting anyone is it?

If someone was to actually make all those changes, what difference would it make to those of us who won't watch it?

Author
Time
 (Edited)
Uncanny Antman said:

 

I AM NOT, and will not get into a war over this.

No one asked you to. This is just a discussion, not a fight. You started the thread...was it to hear other viewpoints, or just to shoot down a (theoretical) fan edit that you don't like the sound of?

For the record, I actually agree that the gigantic, nitpicky list in the Indy 4 thread is a but silly, but it's not hurting anyone is it?

If someone was to actually make all those changes, what difference would it make to those of us who won't watch it?

 

NOTHING AT all, just make sure he still has his hat. Seriously, a fan edit cant change the film, but the magic of free will means anyone can make it what they dream it. But sometimes, it's kinda a long process and not always needed.

 

Author
Time

The list of cuts and changes to KotCS suggested are...well..excessive, bordering on obsessive.

I'm hearing talk of making it a perfect film or a perfect edit....well, the two before it weren't perfect by a long shot. The amount of changes being suggested are intimidating for anyone to even begin to look at it.

Personally, I think it's going too far and I would have liked to have seen an edit by now, that removed some of the worst crap from the film but essentially left it the same.....but for whatever reason - people are a bit nervous about having a go at this one...perhaps for the reasons above.....

Fanedits Completed:

Godzilla : Zilla

Accountability : No Country For Tommy Lee Jones  

A Fistful of Fingers - Preservation  

Samantha Darko

Independence Day Redeclared

 

Thinking about:

Emmerich's Stargate


Author
Time
 (Edited)
TMBTM said:

I do edits every now and then to,and I read some of these posts on possible changes and alterings and cuts,and I just cannot believe the arrogance,and Holier than though attitudes I see

I understand your point, but to me there are several kind of fanediting, those done to make the film better (from the point of view of the editor of course), and those made to radicaly transform the movie in "something else", not necesarry better. I like both.

It all depends on what is the goal of the faneditor. If you want to make OX less crazy in your edit, well, why not give it a try? Perhaps it 'll work. I don't see that as a disrespect on Spielberg's work. Unless the faneditor is an arrogant asshole that spit on the original movie all the time in his comments. But then it's an attitude problem, not an editing problem. (I really don't point at anyone, I check the Indy4 thread from time to time, and I usualy like what I read).

 

 

 

Good point. But what I'm seeing stuff is things like "If we can't get rid of the dumb*** (Ox), at least cut down his dancing" or whatever. I'm paraphrasing, but that's the gist that I see. I guess if you want to make it different, that's fine, but it seems like people are even calling things flaws when they actually make perfect sense.

And, no, MCB, I'm not being sarcastic, I'm 100% serious. I got on this board recently after not having been on in a while, checked out the KOTCS thread, and then starting thinking, "Wait, are you serious? WHY?"

Two-Face - A Batman:The Animated Series Movie
Author
Time

I see it as a creative outlet, as long as egos are kept in check.

Author
Time

In terms of crazy lists, it's probably worth mentioning that the loudest voices in the Indy thread belong to people who have stated that they aren't actually doing an edit themselves.

They just really, really want someone else to do it for them. (Apparently, they are doing all the "hard work" and the editing itself should be a piece of cake when following their step-by-step guide.)

Author
Time

I'll be doing an edit.... But mainly because I think there is a better film in there... And i thought it was pretty fun as is. But there is a better movie there for sure.

Author
Time
Uncanny Antman said:

In terms of crazy lists, it's probably worth mentioning that the loudest voices in the Indy thread belong to people who have stated that they aren't actually doing an edit themselves.

They just really, really want someone else to do it for them. (Apparently, they are doing all the "hard work" and the editing itself should be a piece of cake when following their step-by-step guide.)

Sounds like me w/ my partner! lol   I am always dictating to him what I want, lol

But we are a team so it's a little different.

 

Remember, Highlander, you’ve both still got your full measure of life. Use it well, and your future will be glorious.