- Time
- Post link
CHEWBAKAspelledwrong said:
I’ll start:
Honestly, I don’t think you can top this.
But maybe this:
Or maybe this:
…or this:
Get back to doing fake research at your study-abroad college internship program – that I’m sure mommy and daddy are paying for – you conceited child!
I don’t think you are in a position to be able to call anyone a child, after making such a childish post.
真実
Get back to doing fake research at your study-abroad college internship program – that I’m sure mommy and daddy are paying for – you conceited child!
I don’t think you are in a position to be able to call anyone a child, after making such a childish post.
I must have struck a nerve. Get off of your high horse, and maybe people will stop calling you out.
The Person in Question
This is why we can’t have nice things. Nobody can ignore a remark, and pass the sweet and sour shrimp, you have to keep hammering away at something.
And now Adywan is leaving? Great job!
Thread locked until such time as people are ready to stay on topic. Probably until hell freezes over.
Where were you in '77?
Okay, the boot is off this thread. Don’t make me regret it!
Where were you in '77?
CHEWBAKAspelledwrong said:
I’ll start:
Honestly, I don’t think you can top this.
But maybe this:
Or maybe this:
…or this:
Those are all really bad changes, and are pretty perfect examples of how appalling the SEs are.
The Person in Question
I think the CG Rock captures the true essence of what makes no sense. For George to tell the true intended version of Star Wars he had to add an extra CG Rock. It shows how many things he changed/added simply for the sake of changing things.
What’s the first screen cap? All I see is the “dvdactive” logo.
I would put this in my sig if I weren’t so lazy.
Dvdactive.com is a stingy bitch with its images.
But anyway, running the pic’s URL through Google Image Search turns up the new Mos Eisley approach with great big CG ronto ass in the left corner.
(Hopefully this copy will stay in place and not wander off).
Wouldn’t that count as the same change that the first post shows?
Ceci n’est pas une signature.
As it’s a different, earlier shot, technically no.
Yes, floaty dinosaur is a different moment than dinosaur ass.
Star Wars Revisited Wordpress
Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress
Dvdactive.com is a stingy bitch with its images.
But anyway, running the pic’s URL through Google Image Search turns up the new Mos Eisley approach with great big CG ronto ass in the left corner.
(Hopefully this copy will stay in place and not wander off).
This is also a shot of the birth of the SE, in a way. The very first (and possibly one of the only/few) change planned was to fix that speeder shot from the vaseline smear version it was before. Not such a terrible idea in itself.
After that, obviously many terrible decisions were made.
As it’s a different, earlier shot, technically no.
I know it’s a different shot, but isn’t it the same model, only farther away?
Ceci n’est pas une signature.
As it’s a different, earlier shot, technically no.
I know it’s a different shot, but isn’t it the same model, only farther away?
It is, but it’s even less believable than the other one.
Lol, I never noticed that neither of its hind legs is actually touching the ground.
I would put this in my sig if I weren’t so lazy.
As it’s a different, earlier shot, technically no.
You are technically correct, the best kind of correct.
*does victory dance*
jabba from 2004 and 1997(the worst)