logo Sign In

Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo — Page 643

This topic has been locked by a moderator.

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:

dahmage said:

yhwx said:

dahmage said:

yhwx said:

dahmage said:

yhwx said:

dahmage said:

328 girls were named Abcde in the United States between 1990 and 2014. The name was given to 32 newly born girls in the year 2009 alone.

I don’t think these people should be voting, for one.

don’t blame the children. (and i agree that any born after 2000 should not currently be voting)

I meant the parents of those children.

i didn’t realize they were named Abcde as well! that’s insane. I guess you could have Abcde jr, but is it common to give girls a jr suffix?

I don’t think that parents (who may have any name) who name their children “Abcde” should be voting.

oh i agree, certainly, if they are under 18.

dahmage is declared the winner again.

please, i am running out of room in my trophy case.

Author
Time

Wait, did y’all take me seriously?

Author
Time

yhwx said:

Wait, did y’all take me seriously?

do we live in Russia?

Author
Time

yhwx said:

Wait, did y’all take me seriously?

No one has ever done that.

Author
Time

It’s just that in two instances today, it seems that people thought I was being actually serious when I thought I was being obviously facetious. Frink took my posts in the age thread literally, and both of you seem to take my bit in this thread as literally suggesting that those parents should be barred from voting. I don’t know what’s going on here.

Author
Time

yhwx said:

It’s just that in two instances today, it seems that people thought I was being actually serious when I thought I was being obviously facetious. Frink took my posts in the age thread literally, and both of you seem to take my bit in this thread as literally suggesting that those parents should be barred from voting. I don’t know what’s going on here.

people? frink?

Author
Time

dahmage said:

yhwx said:

It’s just that in two instances today, it seems that people thought I was being actually serious when I thought I was being obviously facetious. Frink took my posts in the age thread literally, and both of you seem to take my bit in this thread as literally suggesting that those parents should be barred from voting. I don’t know what’s going on here.

people? frink?

HE KEEPS GETTING FOOLED

Author
Time

And now there’s this.

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

Wait, did y’all take me seriously?

No one has ever done that.

I don’t think I get comments like this said about me often, but I’m seeing them a lot today. What’s going on? Is there something different today? Is it me?

Author
Time

yhwx said:

And now there’s this.

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

Wait, did y’all take me seriously?

No one has ever done that.

I don’t think I get comments like this said about me often, but I’m seeing them a lot today. What’s going on? Is there something different today? Is it me?

i refuse to believe it is me, if that helps.

Author
Time

yhwx said:

And now there’s this.

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

Wait, did y’all take me seriously?

No one has ever done that.

I don’t think I get comments like this said about me often, but I’m seeing them a lot today.

yhwx said:

Wait, did y’all take me seriously?

Author
Time

dahmage said:

yhwx said:

It’s just that in two instances today, it seems that people thought I was being actually serious when I thought I was being obviously facetious. Frink took my posts in the age thread literally, and both of you seem to take my bit in this thread as literally suggesting that those parents should be barred from voting. I don’t know what’s going on here.

people? frink?

Okay, let’s say it’s Frink. What do you have to say about my post?

Author
Time

dahmage said:

yhwx said:

And now there’s this.

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

Wait, did y’all take me seriously?

No one has ever done that.

I don’t think I get comments like this said about me often, but I’m seeing them a lot today. What’s going on? Is there something different today? Is it me?

i refuse to believe it is me, if that helps.

Who does it help? Is it me?

Author
Time

yhwx said:

dahmage said:

yhwx said:

It’s just that in two instances today, it seems that people thought I was being actually serious when I thought I was being obviously facetious. Frink took my posts in the age thread literally, and both of you seem to take my bit in this thread as literally suggesting that those parents should be barred from voting. I don’t know what’s going on here.

people? frink?

Okay, let’s say it’s Frink. What do you have to say about my post?

Can I answer?

Author
Time

yhwx said:

dahmage said:

yhwx said:

It’s just that in two instances today, it seems that people thought I was being actually serious when I thought I was being obviously facetious. Frink took my posts in the age thread literally, and both of you seem to take my bit in this thread as literally suggesting that those parents should be barred from voting. I don’t know what’s going on here.

people? frink?

Okay, let’s say it’s Frink. What do you have to say about my post?

no, i mean: frink is people?

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

dahmage said:

yhwx said:

It’s just that in two instances today, it seems that people thought I was being actually serious when I thought I was being obviously facetious. Frink took my posts in the age thread literally, and both of you seem to take my bit in this thread as literally suggesting that those parents should be barred from voting. I don’t know what’s going on here.

people? frink?

Okay, let’s say it’s Frink. What do you have to say about my post?

Can I answer?

I’m not sure why that’s a question that needs to be asked, but yes, you can answer.

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

dahmage said:

yhwx said:

It’s just that in two instances today, it seems that people thought I was being actually serious when I thought I was being obviously facetious. Frink took my posts in the age thread literally, and both of you seem to take my bit in this thread as literally suggesting that those parents should be barred from voting. I don’t know what’s going on here.

people? frink?

Okay, let’s say it’s Frink. What do you have to say about my post?

Can I answer?

no

Author
Time

yhwx said:

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

dahmage said:

yhwx said:

It’s just that in two instances today, it seems that people thought I was being actually serious when I thought I was being obviously facetious. Frink took my posts in the age thread literally, and both of you seem to take my bit in this thread as literally suggesting that those parents should be barred from voting. I don’t know what’s going on here.

people? frink?

Okay, let’s say it’s Frink. What do you have to say about my post?

Can I answer?

I’m not sure why that’s a question that needs to be asked, but yes, you can answer.

Author
Time

yhwx said:

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

dahmage said:

yhwx said:

It’s just that in two instances today, it seems that people thought I was being actually serious when I thought I was being obviously facetious. Frink took my posts in the age thread literally, and both of you seem to take my bit in this thread as literally suggesting that those parents should be barred from voting. I don’t know what’s going on here.

people? frink?

Okay, let’s say it’s Frink. What do you have to say about my post?

Can I answer?

I’m not sure why that’s a question that needs to be asked, but yes, you can answer.

I’ve forgotten the question.

Author
Time

dahmage said:

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

dahmage said:

yhwx said:

It’s just that in two instances today, it seems that people thought I was being actually serious when I thought I was being obviously facetious. Frink took my posts in the age thread literally, and both of you seem to take my bit in this thread as literally suggesting that those parents should be barred from voting. I don’t know what’s going on here.

people? frink?

Okay, let’s say it’s Frink. What do you have to say about my post?

Can I answer?

no

dahmage said:

yhwx said:

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

dahmage said:

yhwx said:

It’s just that in two instances today, it seems that people thought I was being actually serious when I thought I was being obviously facetious. Frink took my posts in the age thread literally, and both of you seem to take my bit in this thread as literally suggesting that those parents should be barred from voting. I don’t know what’s going on here.

people? frink?

Okay, let’s say it’s Frink. What do you have to say about my post?

Can I answer?

I’m not sure why that’s a question that needs to be asked, but yes, you can answer.

I don’t know which of you to trust.

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

dahmage said:

yhwx said:

It’s just that in two instances today, it seems that people thought I was being actually serious when I thought I was being obviously facetious. Frink took my posts in the age thread literally, and both of you seem to take my bit in this thread as literally suggesting that those parents should be barred from voting. I don’t know what’s going on here.

people? frink?

Okay, let’s say it’s Frink. What do you have to say about my post?

Can I answer?

I’m not sure why that’s a question that needs to be asked, but yes, you can answer.

I’ve forgotten the question.

yhwx said:

dahmage said:

yhwx said:

It’s just that in two instances today, it seems that people thought I was being actually serious when I thought I was being obviously facetious. Frink took my posts in the age thread literally, and both of you seem to take my bit in this thread as literally suggesting that those parents should be barred from voting. I don’t know what’s going on here.

people? frink?

Okay, let’s say it’s Frink. What do you have to say about my post?