This topic has been locked by a moderator.
Not really from the time that he would have lived, but this more apt for the religion thread.
The Person in Question
I don’t think that guy was trying to be historically accurate.
Charles Manson is finally dead.
http://originaltrilogy.com/topic/fill-in-the-blank-Just-Died/
That’s for when people die.
Charles Mansons are people too.
The Person in Question
So…he didn’t die? What?
Not really from the time that he would have lived, but this more apt for the religion thread.
I think historians agree that Jesus did exist, whether he was the son of God and could perform miracles and rise from the dead is of course debated.
Charles Mansons are people too.
2012 called, it wants its joke back!
The Person in Question
So…he didn’t die? What?
Pretty sure Manson died.
Not really from the time that he would have lived, but this more apt for the religion thread.
I think historians agree that Jesus did exist, whether he was the son of God and could perform miracles and rise from the dead is of course debated.
Whether he existed in a form resembling the biblical narrative is debated. Him being the song of God and performing miracles is debated but not really by historians.
The Person in Question
Charles Mansons are people too.
agree to disagree
Oh, so he’s not a person. Ok I get it now.
So…he didn’t die? What?
I think Warbler’s saying that he shouldn’t be called person.
JEDIT: God damn it.
Not really from the time that he would have lived, but this more apt for the religion thread.
I think historians agree that Jesus did exist, whether he was the son of God and could perform miracles and rise from the dead is of course debated.
Whether he existed in a form resembling the biblical narrative is debated. Him being the song of God and performing miracles is debated but not really by historians.
I don’t think anyone believes he is the song of God.
Not really from the time that he would have lived, but this more apt for the religion thread.
I think historians agree that Jesus did exist, whether he was the son of God and could perform miracles and rise from the dead is of course debated.
Whether he existed in a form resembling the biblical narrative is debated. Him being the song of God and performing miracles is debated but not really by historians.
I don’t think anyone believes he is the song of God.
Warbler.
Not really from the time that he would have lived, but this more apt for the religion thread.
I think historians agree that Jesus did exist, whether he was the son of God and could perform miracles and rise from the dead is of course debated.
Whether he existed in a form resembling the biblical narrative is debated. Him being the song of God and performing miracles is debated but not really by historians.
I don’t think anyone believes he is the song of God.
From a figurative point of view he could be interpreted that way.
The Person in Question
Not really from the time that he would have lived, but this more apt for the religion thread.
I think historians agree that Jesus did exist, whether he was the son of God and could perform miracles and rise from the dead is of course debated.
Whether he existed in a form resembling the biblical narrative is debated. Him being the song of God and performing miracles is debated but not really by historians.
I don’t think anyone believes he is the song of God.
Warbler.
What? I was making a joke out his typo.
Not really from the time that he would have lived, but this more apt for the religion thread.
I think historians agree that Jesus did exist, whether he was the son of God and could perform miracles and rise from the dead is of course debated.
Whether he existed in a form resembling the biblical narrative is debated. Him being the song of God and performing miracles is debated but not really by historians.
I don’t think anyone believes he is the song of God.
Warbler.
What? I was making a joke out his typo.
Didn’t think that, considering your history of taking things very literally.
Not really from the time that he would have lived, but this more apt for the religion thread.
I think historians agree that Jesus did exist, whether he was the son of God and could perform miracles and rise from the dead is of course debated.
Whether he existed in a form resembling the biblical narrative is debated. Him being the song of God and performing miracles is debated but not really by historians.
I don’t think anyone believes he is the song of God.
From a figurative point of view he could be interpreted that way.
Not really from the time that he would have lived, but this more apt for the religion thread.
I think historians agree that Jesus did exist, whether he was the son of God and could perform miracles and rise from the dead is of course debated.
Whether he existed in a form resembling the biblical narrative is debated. Him being the song of God and performing miracles is debated but not really by historians.
I don’t think anyone believes he is the song of God.
Well, if he is the Word, and the Word was with God and the word was God and all as John 1 says, who’s to say God didn’t sing His Word?
.
For the record I got Warb’s joke as soon as he posted it and I appreciated it.
Not really from the time that he would have lived, but this more apt for the religion thread.
I think historians agree that Jesus did exist, whether he was the son of God and could perform miracles and rise from the dead is of course debated.
Whether he existed in a form resembling the biblical narrative is debated. Him being the song of God and performing miracles is debated but not really by historians.
I don’t think anyone believes he is the song of God.
Well, if he is the Word, and the Word was God and all as John 1 says, who’s to say God didn’t sing his Word?
I suppose that is a good point.
Debated using the current events thread but he’s a political reporter so
And here’s another accusation against Al Franken.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/20/politics/al-franken-inappropriate-touch-2010/index.html
A woman says Sen. Al Franken inappropriately touched her in 2010, telling CNN that he grabbed her buttocks while taking a photo at the Minnesota State Fair.
Why is one curse word considered worse than another? Not entirely sure. I’ve seldom heard the C word used in R rated movies even. Only one I can think of off the top of my head is Silence Of The Lambs.
I think I’ve heard it in more than just Silence Of The Lambs.
I didn’t realize it was considered THAT bad a word. I mean I knew it was a bad word. But it is worse than I realized.
It’s used hilariously in the 1999 film Election.
In one of those kooky coincidences, I heard it uttered in a 70’s comedy film last night. Took me by surprise as I’d seen the film before.
Where were you in '77?