logo Sign In

Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo — Page 236

This topic has been locked by a moderator.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

SilverWook said:

Jetrell Fo said:

SilverWook said:

generalfrevious said:

I’m sick of the Russian hacking conspiracy. Let’s instead focus on the real problems, like the GOP taking away people’s healthcare, or gutting environmental policy, or the executive branch trying to destroy free speech.

All equally valid concerns, but if you think they aren’t trying to pull this crap in other countries’ elections, and won’t try messing with ours again in 2020, I have some lovely Florida swampland you might be interested in.

Let’s not forget that our own Government has done the same thing to other countries trying to promote Democracy.

We’ve hacked other nation’s elections and secretly recorded blackmail videos of candidates? 😉

These things have a long shelf life. What we did to Iran in the 50’s still shapes our relationship not only with Iran, but the whole Middle East. And what we did wasn’t really that much less sophisticated than propaganda and pee tapes, although it clearly wasn’t identical. Same thing for any of the countries where we’ve done something similar. The fact that we can be on good behavior for a few years really doesn’t change that. They don’t see it as something Eisenhower did to them and he’s long gone–they see it as something the US did to them, and the US is still very much around to blame for the fallout. And yes, there is quite a lot of fallout still around today from a 60-year-old coup.

I imagine the relationship between NATO countries and Russia is now changed in a similar fashion. We’ll be dealing with Trump fallout long after Putin’s dead and buried.

EDIT: I guess I should clarify that it’s not like NATO and Russia got along great before. However, now within the domestic politics of NATO countries, people can now blame domestic issues on Russia with some credibility. That’s basically how Cuba worked for decades–Stuff is bad? Blame the US embargo. Which wasn’t a complete and nuanced answer, but it was true enough to work. Now NATO countries will likely do this with Russia. No health care? Blame Russia (not me, the poor hoodwinked Senator who voted for it, blame Russia!). The fact that there’s truth behind it doesn’t mean it’s a good development.

Project Threepio (Star Wars OOT subtitles)

Author
Time

The House Republicans just destroyed healthcare in this country. It could fail in the Senate, but I doubt that’s going to happen.

Republicans are nothing but a bunch of remorseless monsters that want to push their agenda across, even if 99% of the country opposes it. I’m sure the few who opposed this horrendous law are going to lose their primaries to even more extremist candidates in heavily gerrymandered districts.

They all think like President Trump; the moderates are just the ones who act like they don’t.

Author
Time

SilverWook said:

Jetrell Fo said:

SilverWook said:

generalfrevious said:

I’m sick of the Russian hacking conspiracy. Let’s instead focus on the real problems, like the GOP taking away people’s healthcare, or gutting environmental policy, or the executive branch trying to destroy free speech.

All equally valid concerns, but if you think they aren’t trying to pull this crap in other countries’ elections, and won’t try messing with ours again in 2020, I have some lovely Florida swampland you might be interested in.

Let’s not forget that our own Government has done the same thing to other countries trying to promote Democracy.

We’ve hacked other nation’s elections and secretly recorded blackmail videos of candidates? 😉

Us, the United Angelic States of the World? Come on now, our Government is perfectly legit and 100% transparent.

😉

Author
Time
 (Edited)

generalfrevious said:

The House Republicans just destroyed healthcare in this country. It could fail in the Senate, but I doubt that’s going to happen.

Republicans are nothing but a bunch of remorseless monsters that want to push their agenda across, even if 99% of the country opposes it. I’m sure the few who opposed this horrendous law are going to lose their primaries to even more extremist candidates in heavily gerrymandered districts.

They all think like President Trump; the moderates are just the ones who act like they don’t.

You do realize what that means if this horrible bill you talk about passes both houses right? That means … Democrats are just as bad as Republicans.

😉

Author
Time

hopefully the bill will get filibustered in the Senate.

Author
Time

Jetrell Fo said:

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/05/03/susan-rice-testify-237947

Via her lawyer, Susan Rice declines to testify in front of Senate Subcommittee on Russian Meddling.

Former Obama administration National Security Adviser Susan Rice on Wednesday declined a request to testify next week before a Senate subcommittee, citing separation of powers between the executive and legislative branches and the fact that the invitation was not bipartisan.

Rice’s decision to decline the invitation to testify on Russia’s election meddling came in a letter from her lawyer, Kathryn Ruemmler, to the leaders of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Terrorism, Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.).

😦

First Susan Rice won’t testify, now Huma Abedin won’t either … I smell a pile of subpoenas getting ready to be delivered.

http://nypost.com/2017/05/04/huma-abedin-wont-explain-classified-emails-she-sent-to-weiner/

Author
Time

Warbler said:

hopefully the bill will get filibustered in the Senate.

They’ll just extend the nuclear option again.

Thank you, Democrats, for filibustering Gorsuch’s confirmation.

Author
Time

generalfrevious said:

Warbler said:

hopefully the bill will get filibustered in the Senate.

They’ll just extend the nuclear option again.

I don’t know if they are willing to go that far. It is one thing to get rid of the filibuster for Supreme Court confirmations, but quite another to get rid of it altogether. Also remember the Republicans must consider the future when the Dems have the majority in the Senate.

Author
Time

generalfrevious said:

Warbler said:

hopefully the bill will get filibustered in the Senate.

They’ll just extend the nuclear option again.

Thank you, Democrats, for filibustering Gorsuch’s confirmation.

The one has nothing to do with the other.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Warbler said:

generalfrevious said:

Warbler said:

hopefully the bill will get filibustered in the Senate.

They’ll just extend the nuclear option again.

I don’t know if they are willing to go that far. It is one thing to get rid of the filibuster for Supreme Court confirmations, but quite another to get rid of it altogether. Also remember the Republicans must consider the future when the Dems have the majority in the Senate.

They’re not going to abolish altogether at once; they’ll chisel at it step by step during the next eighteen months. They’re going to make sure the democrats never gain a majority in the senate in the near future.

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:


Source

Good luck, Trump voters.

Frink, Frink, Frink, . . . That is from CNN. When are you going to learn not to site fake news networks?

Author
Time

generalfrevious said:

Warbler said:

generalfrevious said:

Warbler said:

hopefully the bill will get filibustered in the Senate.

They’ll just extend the nuclear option again.

I don’t know if they are willing to go that far. It is one thing to get rid of the filibuster for Supreme Court confirmations, but quite another to get rid of it altogether. Also remember the Republicans must consider the future when the Dems have the majority in the Senate.

They’re not going to abolish altogether at once; they’ll chisel at it step by step during the next eighteen months. They’re going to make sure the democrats never gain a majority in the senate in the near future.

If they get rid of it for regular bills(which is what they would have to do to get a around a filibuster on this bill), just what would be left of it to chisel at for the next 18 months?

Author
Time

Warbler said:

generalfrevious said:

Warbler said:

generalfrevious said:

Warbler said:

hopefully the bill will get filibustered in the Senate.

They’ll just extend the nuclear option again.

I don’t know if they are willing to go that far. It is one thing to get rid of the filibuster for Supreme Court confirmations, but quite another to get rid of it altogether. Also remember the Republicans must consider the future when the Dems have the majority in the Senate.

They’re not going to abolish altogether at once; they’ll chisel at it step by step during the next eighteen months. They’re going to make sure the democrats never gain a majority in the senate in the near future.

If they get rid of it for regular bills(which is what they would have to do to get a around a filibuster on this bill), just what would be left of it to chisel at for the next 18 months?

They could abolish filibusters for just Healthcare bills at first, then extend it to other laws the democrats wouldn’t like over the next few months until none are left.

Author
Time

I’m not sure that is possible.

Author
Time

Warbler said:

I’m not sure that is possible.

Donald Trump is president now. What was unthinkable in US history prior is just another day for these regressive scum.

Author
Time

generalfrevious said:

Warbler said:

I’m not sure that is possible.

What was unthinkable in US history prior is just another day for these regressive scum.

You’re too narrow-minded. History is littered with examples of what you say was unthinkable.

😦

Author
Time

In better news, Trump has appointed negative1 to head the Federal Witness Protection Program. We attempted to contact Team Vitale to see how they felt about the new leadership, but they did not answer their phone, and their listed address appeared to be a burnt-down building.

I’ll show myself out.

Project Threepio (Star Wars OOT subtitles)

Author
Time

generalfrevious said:

Warbler said:

I’m not sure that is possible.

Donald Trump is president now. What was unthinkable in US history prior is just another day for these regressive scum.

Trump doesn’t have say over Senate rules.

Author
Time

CatBus said:

In better news, Trump has appointed negative1 to head the Federal Witness Protection Program.

ALLOL

Author
Time

Jetrell Fo said:

generalfrevious said:

Warbler said:

I’m not sure that is possible.

What was unthinkable in US history prior is just another day for these regressive scum.

You’re too narrow-minded. History is littered with examples of what you say was unthinkable.

😦

But it has never happened in the US before.

Trump’s dictatorship is simply unprecedented. We have never had a president installed by a foreign power before; we have never had the cabinet staffed with so many people hostile to a large percentage of the American people before.

Hitler did not have a nuclear football at his side, Stalin died not long after the Soviets went nuclear, Kim Jong-Un still can’t get his ICBMs working (as of now), and the countless lesser dictators of the last fifty years surely did not have enough nukes to wipe out civilization six times over.

We have never faced two existential threats (nuclear winter and climate change) before, and never before have we had a leader who showed up at the worst possible moment for humanity. I was always feared Trump becoming president, and now that he is starting to tighten his grip on power I am being proven right.

Author
Time

Warbler said:

generalfrevious said:

Warbler said:

I’m not sure that is possible.

Donald Trump is president now. What was unthinkable in US history prior is just another day for these regressive scum.

Trump doesn’t have say over Senate rules.

Maybe, but that doesn’t stop senate republicans from digging up obscure rules to silence the opposition, like when they silenced Elizabeth Warren a couple months ago.