logo Sign In

Updating Ghostbusters and Back to the Future........

This topic has been locked by a moderator.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Hi boys! My ex loves star wars and told me this is a good place to talk movies. I havent watched alot of them but I always thought Kirk was hotter.

So anyways, I like movies especially alot of older movies. But if there's one thing I cant stand it's old special effects. I think movies should get frequent updates so they can look good to the eyes of our audiences today. I remember watching Ghostbusters and Back to the future in the 90's when i was a kid, but I re-watched them recently and the effects were totally lame! So I think these companies should release these movies again with new effects so we could enjoy them again! what do you boys think???

Author
Time
 (Edited)

All right. I'll take this seriously for a second here: yes, as long as the originals are preserved and available for the anal retentive film buff in everyone. Ghostbusters looks ok to me, but the matte boxes on the dog-creatures could go without me going crazy (the current Blu-ray looks gorgeous except for how obvious those are).


That said... prepare for shitstorm.

A Goon in a Gaggle of 'em

Author
Time

Hola bkev,

I really dont think Ghostbusters looks good at all. I dont know what matte boxes are, but i just think everything looks so FAKE.

What do you mean about the shitstorm?

Love you lots, --Taggart

Author
Time

Hi boys,

What exactly is a TROLL?

Ever since 2009 when I hurt my foot real bad, Ive been coming to the forums. People on alot of them have been calling me a TROLL... i dont get it.

I just want to talk movies, boys!

Love you lots, --Taggart

Author
Time

Join date - October 22.

 

“Grow up. These are my Disney's movies, not yours.”

Author
Time

I'm guessing your ex was a vindictive JediTray?

A Goon in a Gaggle of 'em

Author
Time

georgec said:

Join date - October 22.

 

Not just this forum, silly! I go on alot of forums.

Love you lots, --Taggart

Author
Time

I sense something; a presence I've not felt since...

The blue elephant in the room.

Author
Time

bkev said:

I'm guessing your ex was a vindictive JediTray?

Whos JediTray? My ex is named Darrell. I dont think he ever had an account on these forums! He just suggested them to me...

He was a great guy, but things kinda fell out after the crash a few years ago. I still have trouble walking and its kinda embarrassing to walk like i do in my high school.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Oh, c'mon Bingo.  We know this is another one of your smelly socks ;)

Author
Time

darth_ender said:

Oh, c'mon Bingo.  We know this is another one of your smelly socks ;)

I know we all hate trolls, but this one's hard to put a finger on.

Is she a troll? If not, it'd be a shame for us to run her out of these forums.

A picture is worth a thousand words. Post 102 is worth more.

I’m late to the party, but I think this is the best song. Enjoy!

—Teams Jetrell Fo 1, Jetrell Fo 2, and Jetrell Fo 3

Author
Time

TaggartFrenzy said:

Hi boys! My ex loves star wars and told me this is a good place to talk movies. I havent watched alot of them but I always thought Kirk was hotter.

So anyways, I like movies especially alot of older movies. But if there's one thing I cant stand it's old special effects. I think movies should get frequent updates so they can look good to the eyes of our audiences today. I remember watching Ghostbusters and Back to the future in the 90's when i was a kid, but I re-watched them recently and the effects were totally lame! So I think these companies should release these movies again with new effects so we could enjoy them again! what do you boys think???

Generally, folks around here think that there's value in the old effects. Yeah, they're different, stylistically, from today's effects - but that doesn't necessarily mean they're better or worse. Those movies weren't made today, and it's disingenuous to pretend they were. Movies made in different periods each have a unique aesthetic. Requiring them to match whatever look is popular at the moment demonstrates a lack of appreciation for anything other than that with which you are most familiar, whereas cultivating the ability to appreciate older films in their original state may take maturity while expanding your mind. Additionally, films are art, and modifying them means wrecking up the artist's original intentions a bit. Is there a time and a place for that, the remixing and modification of existing works? Yes, although all too often the results of upgrading effects do not turn out nearly as well as hoped. But even if films are altered over time, the original work of art should be preserved. You wouldn't suggest replacing all the old paintings in art museums with computer generated, photorealistic substitutes, would you? I wouldn't.

ROTJ Storyboard Reconstruction Project

Author
Time

Hi boys!

 

What is this I don't even.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Remember: There are no women on the internet.

Keep Circulating the Tapes.

END OF LINE

(It hasn’t happened yet)

Author
Time

TaggartFrenzy said:

Hi boys! My ex loves star wars and told me this is a good place to talk movies. I havent watched alot of them but I always thought Kirk was hotter.

So anyways, I like movies especially alot of older movies. But if there's one thing I cant stand it's old special effects. I think movies should get frequent updates so they can look good to the eyes of our audiences today. I remember watching Ghostbusters and Back to the future in the 90's when i was a kid, but I re-watched them recently and the effects were totally lame! So I think these companies should release these movies again with new effects so we could enjoy them again! what do you boys think???

no, just like I don't think they should go back and update the effects of the original King Kong.     Leave the movies alone

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Bingowings said:

You meen hes a .... ?

 

Well, you know what they say about OP.

And I don't mean Ron Howard.

Keep Circulating the Tapes.

END OF LINE

(It hasn’t happened yet)

Author
Time

You meen Ron Howard is a .... ?

Author
Time

I can't put it any better than timdiggerm already did. 

There is no lingerie in space…

C3PX said: Gaffer is like that hot girl in high school that you think you have a chance with even though she is way out of your league because she is sweet and not a stuck up bitch who pretends you don’t exist… then one day you spot her making out with some skinny twerp, only on second glance you realize it is the goth girl who always sits in the back of class; at that moment it dawns on you why she is never seen hanging off the arm of any of the jocks… and you realize, damn, she really is unobtainable after all. Not that that is going to stop you from dreaming… Only in this case, Gaffer is actually a guy.

Author
Time

Well, you could avoid taking it seriously...

Author
Time

Well, I'd still rather take someone seriously and be proven wrong than treat someone like a joke and be proven wrong.

There is no lingerie in space…

C3PX said: Gaffer is like that hot girl in high school that you think you have a chance with even though she is way out of your league because she is sweet and not a stuck up bitch who pretends you don’t exist… then one day you spot her making out with some skinny twerp, only on second glance you realize it is the goth girl who always sits in the back of class; at that moment it dawns on you why she is never seen hanging off the arm of any of the jocks… and you realize, damn, she really is unobtainable after all. Not that that is going to stop you from dreaming… Only in this case, Gaffer is actually a guy.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Baphomet said:


http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e1/Horned_God.JPG/450px-Horned_God.JPG

I'd just like to say that TaggartFrenzy is not a representitive of the Wiccan church and that her beliefs in general are not endoursed by either me or the Mother Goddess.