Alexrd said:

Klingon_Jedi said:

Really they should never have killed Maul in the first place and had him in the General's role.

If they hadn't killed Maul, we wouldn't get Christopher Lee as a Sith Lord.

As much as I love Lee, his character really didn't get to do much, and got shafted in III. he could've easily done the same things in II as a simple rogue Jedi. You could've even merely had Maul skip an episode or support Dooku.

it would have added much-needed dramatic and emotional depth to Grievous' character (because otherwise he just comes out of nowhere), ESPECIALLY for Obi-Wan.

Precisely why I like it.