Sign In

Post #1196819

Author
chyron8472
Parent topic
Religion
Link to post in topic
http://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1196819/action/topic#1196819
Date created
16-Apr-2018, 9:55 AM
Last modified
16-Apr-2018, 9:59 AM
Edited by
chyron8472
Reason for edit
None provided

moviefreakedmind said:

I’d appreciate not being expected to think of your personal experiences as objective fact for everyone to take seriously.

People can take my testimony or opinions however they choose. That isn’t to say that your position is objective, or fact by default, just because I can’t scientifically prove mine.

It’s an issue of credibility of the witness, not scientific verifiability.

moviefreakedmind said:

I doubt very seriously that anyone, including you, would find a statement from me saying “Ghosts are real, I’ve had experiences that prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt, I just can’t reproduce those experiences . . .” to be all that compelling.

Case in point. Why should your testimony of your experiences not be compelling evidence? Just because I can’t recreate it in a lab doesn’t make it not valid testimony.