logo Sign In

The Last Jedi: Official Review and Opinions Thread ** SPOILERS ** — Page 203

Author
Time

The bombs don’t need much of an explanation. Magnets? Sure, okay, as long as they don’t just stick to the bomber…oh wait, did they just introduce a redundantly unnecessary plothole?!

There is artificial gravity in the ship…hence all the falling of the girl and the remote. So the bombs will fall. And in space they will continue their trajectory.

The blue elephant in the room.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Creox said:

yhwx said:

A thing on timelines here: The two main storylines in TLJ start at different times. The escape storyline starts a week after the events of TFA; the Ach-To storyline happens immediately after the events of TFA.

The bomber: People complained about how the bomber thing was unrealistic because there’s no gravity in space. That pedantry is inaccurate. The bombs fell due to the gravitational force of the Star Destroyer underneath the bomber. This is the same reason that Star Destroyer falls into the Death Star in ROTJ.

I read in the visual dictionary that the bombs used magnetic tech as well.

I think it may be this one?:-


 

huh, a bit of a feeling of deva vu there.

A little patience goes a long way on this old-school Rebel base. If you are having issues finding what you are looking for, these will be of some help…

Welcome to the OriginalTrilogy.com | Introduce yourself in here | Useful info within : About : Help : Site Rules : Fan Project Rules : Announcements
How do I do this?’ on the OriginalTrilogy.com; some info & answers + FAQs - includes info on how to search for projects and threads on the OT•com

A Project Index for Star Wars Preservations (Harmy’s Despecialized & 4K77/80/83 etc) : A Project Index for Star Wars Fan Edits (adywan & Hal 9000 etc)

… and take your time to look around this site before posting - to get a feel for this place. Don’t just lazily make yet another thread asking for projects.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Creox said:

yhwx said:

A thing on timelines here: The two main storylines in TLJ start at different times. The escape storyline starts a week after the events of TFA; the Ach-To storyline happens immediately after the events of TFA.

The bomber: People complained about how the bomber thing was unrealistic because there’s no gravity in space. That pedantry is inaccurate. The bombs fell due to the gravitational force of the Star Destroyer underneath the bomber. This is the same reason that Star Destroyer falls into the Death Star in ROTJ.

I read in the visual dictionary that the bombs used magnetic tech as well.

Yes, and that is unnecessary. The artificial gravity within the bomber is enough to give the bombs an initial velocity once they are released to propel them towards the target, as Mrebo already pointed it out.

Author
Time

chyron8472 said:

KILLOFFPOE said:

So in almost every scene of the movie I had a knife twisting in my side about how bad this was and didn’t make sense. Makes it really hard to appreciate the good aspects.

You are seeing the movie as awful because you expect to see it that way. You have preconceived ideas about how the Star Wars Universe is supposed to work, whether you decided them on your own or were given them by EU. You feel the movie twisting a knife when that knife belongs to you.

You do not let the movies tell you a story on their own terms. You want it to be on your terms and are angry and frustrated that it doesn’t work that way. If you were willing to let the films tell their own stories and expand your understanding of the universe as you acquire more information about it, you would be able to accept and enjoy it.

 
But it doesn’t make sense that we could have sent people to walk on the moon because planes don’t crash into the ground when they fly in straight lines, so the Apollo missions must have been faked since we know the Earth to be flat.

I have to agree with your assessment, though I think your last paragraph is a bit off topic. DrDre was expecting ROTJ hero Luke, not old Mentor Luke. Such a fall is a mythic trope. I don’t know what some others were expecting, but whatever they expected they were disappointed. I was looking for a good story and I researched how likely Rian Johnson was to deliver that and was pleased with the potential and the final product met my expectations (being a good story). I watched Twelve O’Clock High and the space chase and the command structure wrangling and Poe’s lessons are so in keeping with that film. They lessons are very character specific and are quite different from that film, but you can see the same story telling at work. Finn starts out, once he wakes up, with a mission and Rose shows him that he should be on a different mission and he goes from someone traveling along with the resistance to being one of them. Rey is forced to face her parents. She was forced to face that they were never coming back in TFA, and in this one she is faced with them being just normal people, of no particular importance. Both revelations shake her to the core and her character has gone from looking for a place to belong to finding it (why else did she take the ancient Jedi texts). They stories played out in their own way and are nicely woven together to create a good final product.

TLJ has none of Abrams ridiculousness and his contrived story telling methods and sticks to traditional story telling, just like Lucas did in the OT. I felt that he understood the Hero’s Journey and Cambell’s work as well as the 30’s sci-fi serial and thee 50’s Samurai films that really gave Star Wars its flavor. It was a great middle chapter that gave purpose to Abrams film. Hopefully the ending that Rian was writing towards is something that Abrams can complete rather than doing his own thing. I see several paths to reach a conclusion, either not skipping time or skipping a few years. We shall see what IX brings. I almost wish they’d do what so many book series adaptions have done and split the next on into two films, but I think Rian had an ending in mind and I think I see part of what it is. I think he was going with Lucas’s balancing the force concept and this entire trilogy would be about finishing the prophesy.

And as for bringing this back to an Empire vs. Rebellion, isn’t that what the Thrawn trilogy did? True it was still the New Republic, but he brought the Empire back big time - bigger than the First Order (though we really don’t know how big it is, but the New Republic (whose capital and fleet were destroyed) in TFA is a lot smaller than the Legends New Republic. The Thrawn trilogy was something many considered as standing in the place of the ST or good material to adapt for the ST. But this is 30 years on instead of 10, and that is 30 years for a slice of the old Empire to grow and build a large military industrial complex that can put out huge ships and a lot of manpower.

I really don’t know what people were expecting from a sequel trilogy, but then again I don’t know what people were expecting from the prequel trilogy either. The story GL chose to tell wasn’t as iconic as the OT, which means it was never going to be as good, and then it was flawed with too much GL in the scripts and some strange directing choices that I can see and appreciate, but that don’t really forward the story. Abrams almost did better than GL, but Rian nailed what this trilogy needed and set a course forward. I have little confidence that Abrams will pull off a stirring finale to the saga on his own. But if he has script and editing help and is working off of what GL, Rian, or both, had in mind, it could be incredible. Or he could flub it like he did TFA.

Author
Time

Dr. Krogshöj said:

Creox said:

yhwx said:

A thing on timelines here: The two main storylines in TLJ start at different times. The escape storyline starts a week after the events of TFA; the Ach-To storyline happens immediately after the events of TFA.

The bomber: People complained about how the bomber thing was unrealistic because there’s no gravity in space. That pedantry is inaccurate. The bombs fell due to the gravitational force of the Star Destroyer underneath the bomber. This is the same reason that Star Destroyer falls into the Death Star in ROTJ.

I read in the visual dictionary that the bombs used magnetic tech as well.

Yes, and that is unnecessary. The artificial gravity within the bomber is enough to give the bombs an initial velocity once they are released to propel them towards the target, as Mrebo already pointed it out.

Also, this obviates the need to talk about the gravity of the ship, which cannot be that significant. I wonder if someone at LFL actually saw a plothole here and came up with magnets or if they were just a cool add-on.

The blue elephant in the room.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Mrebo said:

Dr. Krogshöj said:

Creox said:

yhwx said:

A thing on timelines here: The two main storylines in TLJ start at different times. The escape storyline starts a week after the events of TFA; the Ach-To storyline happens immediately after the events of TFA.

The bomber: People complained about how the bomber thing was unrealistic because there’s no gravity in space. That pedantry is inaccurate. The bombs fell due to the gravitational force of the Star Destroyer underneath the bomber. This is the same reason that Star Destroyer falls into the Death Star in ROTJ.

I read in the visual dictionary that the bombs used magnetic tech as well.

Yes, and that is unnecessary. The artificial gravity within the bomber is enough to give the bombs an initial velocity once they are released to propel them towards the target, as Mrebo already pointed it out.

Also, this obviates the need to talk about the gravity of the ship, which cannot be that significant. I wonder if someone at LFL actually saw a plothole here and came up with magnets or if they were just a cool add-on.

Look, there are plenty of plotholes and mistakes in the OT too if you don’t add EU/Wookieepedia explanations. Contrivances or not, whether it matters to you that it doesn’t make sense on its face comes down to your own choice of whether to just sit back and enjoy it.

TV’s Frink said:

chyron just put a big Ric pic in your sig and be done with it.

Author
Time

chyron8472 said:

Mrebo said:

Dr. Krogshöj said:

Creox said:

yhwx said:

A thing on timelines here: The two main storylines in TLJ start at different times. The escape storyline starts a week after the events of TFA; the Ach-To storyline happens immediately after the events of TFA.

The bomber: People complained about how the bomber thing was unrealistic because there’s no gravity in space. That pedantry is inaccurate. The bombs fell due to the gravitational force of the Star Destroyer underneath the bomber. This is the same reason that Star Destroyer falls into the Death Star in ROTJ.

I read in the visual dictionary that the bombs used magnetic tech as well.

Yes, and that is unnecessary. The artificial gravity within the bomber is enough to give the bombs an initial velocity once they are released to propel them towards the target, as Mrebo already pointed it out.

Also, this obviates the need to talk about the gravity of the ship, which cannot be that significant. I wonder if someone at LFL actually saw a plothole here and came up with magnets or if they were just a cool add-on.

Look, there are plenty of plotholes and mistakes in the OT too if you don’t add EU/Wookieepedia explanations. Contrivances or not, whether it matters to you that it doesn’t make sense on its face comes down to your own choice of whether to just sit back and enjoy it.

We’re just talking here. I don’t care about physics being entirely realistic. In this case, the physics do make sense. That should give some SW junkies peace of mind.

The blue elephant in the room.

Author
Time

Mrebo said:

chyron8472 said:

Mrebo said:

Dr. Krogshöj said:

Creox said:

yhwx said:

A thing on timelines here: The two main storylines in TLJ start at different times. The escape storyline starts a week after the events of TFA; the Ach-To storyline happens immediately after the events of TFA.

The bomber: People complained about how the bomber thing was unrealistic because there’s no gravity in space. That pedantry is inaccurate. The bombs fell due to the gravitational force of the Star Destroyer underneath the bomber. This is the same reason that Star Destroyer falls into the Death Star in ROTJ.

I read in the visual dictionary that the bombs used magnetic tech as well.

Yes, and that is unnecessary. The artificial gravity within the bomber is enough to give the bombs an initial velocity once they are released to propel them towards the target, as Mrebo already pointed it out.

Also, this obviates the need to talk about the gravity of the ship, which cannot be that significant. I wonder if someone at LFL actually saw a plothole here and came up with magnets or if they were just a cool add-on.

Look, there are plenty of plotholes and mistakes in the OT too if you don’t add EU/Wookieepedia explanations. Contrivances or not, whether it matters to you that it doesn’t make sense on its face comes down to your own choice of whether to just sit back and enjoy it.

We’re just talking here.

Well you’ll never win with that attitude!

Author
Time
 (Edited)

chyron8472 said:

Mrebo said:

Dr. Krogshöj said:

Creox said:

yhwx said:

A thing on timelines here: The two main storylines in TLJ start at different times. The escape storyline starts a week after the events of TFA; the Ach-To storyline happens immediately after the events of TFA.

The bomber: People complained about how the bomber thing was unrealistic because there’s no gravity in space. That pedantry is inaccurate. The bombs fell due to the gravitational force of the Star Destroyer underneath the bomber. This is the same reason that Star Destroyer falls into the Death Star in ROTJ.

I read in the visual dictionary that the bombs used magnetic tech as well.

Yes, and that is unnecessary. The artificial gravity within the bomber is enough to give the bombs an initial velocity once they are released to propel them towards the target, as Mrebo already pointed it out.

Also, this obviates the need to talk about the gravity of the ship, which cannot be that significant. I wonder if someone at LFL actually saw a plothole here and came up with magnets or if they were just a cool add-on.

Look, there are plenty of plotholes and mistakes in the OT too if you don’t add EU/Wookieepedia explanations. Contrivances or not, whether it matters to you that it doesn’t make sense on its face comes down to your own choice of whether to just sit back and enjoy it.

For example:

In ANH, when the Blockade Runner’s main reactor was hit and their engines shut down, why didn’t that massive explosion on the side of the ship also knock their trajectory off course or send them spinning out of control?

Why did Luke fall sideways into a tunnel when he let go of the platform at the end of ESB?

Why did shooting an AT-AT in the neck blow it up only after it fell forward?

Why did Han and Leia only have face masks on inside the giant space slug when they assumed it was an empty asteroid with no atmosphere? And why was there sufficient gravity to walk normally on when the asteroid was smaller than our Moon?

Why was the arm that Ben Kenobi cut off in the cantina furry and clawed when one man was humanoid and the other had flippers?

Why does Shuttle Tydirium that is supposedly transporting parts and crew (by the rebels) to Endor look identical to the shuttle carrying the Emperor himself?

et al.

TV’s Frink said:

chyron just put a big Ric pic in your sig and be done with it.

Author
Time

Looks like you’re trying to convince yourself. 😉

Author
Time
 (Edited)

TV’s Frink said:

Looks like you’re trying to convince yourself. 😉

I’m saying that I enjoy the OT, and can overlook those problems or accept explanations for them. If someone enjoys the OT but is saying TLJ sucks in part because the bombers’ physics don’t per se make sense, they obviously aren’t using the same measuring stick for both trilogies.

If they’re going to complain that bombers in space don’t work that way, they should have to also complain that ramming a Super Stardestroyer into the Death Star wouldn’t create a vertically burning fire.

TV’s Frink said:

chyron just put a big Ric pic in your sig and be done with it.

Author
Time

The answer to all of these was of course that a Space Wizard did it.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

So I just watched The Dark Knight and The Dark Knight Rises back to back, and I think that if TLJ treated Luke the same way TDKR treats Batman, TLJ Luke would be much more acceptable to me.

For example, at the end of both TLJ and TDKR, the older hero passes on the torch to the pupil, but while in TDKR Batman wins the war and finally provides peace a second time, Luke… just passes on the torch and says “hey boyos, now that I’ve given you guys hope please clean it up!!”

Author
Time

chyron8472 said:

TV’s Frink said:

Looks like you’re trying to convince yourself. 😉

I’m saying that I enjoy the OT, and can overlook those problems or accept explanations for them. If someone enjoys the OT but is saying TLJ sucks in part because the bombers’ physics don’t per se make sense, they obviously aren’t using the same measuring stick for both trilogies.

If they’re going to complain that bombers in space don’t work that way, they should have to also complain that ramming a Super Stardestroyer into the Death Star wouldn’t create a vertically burning fire.

I just said it because you quoted yourself, not because I actually read it.

😉 <----------Winky

Author
Time

Collipso said:

So I just watched The Dark Knight and The Dark Knight Rises, and I think that if TLJ treated Luke the same way TDKR treats Batman, it would’ve been a whole lot better.

For example, at the end of both movies, the older hero passes on the torch to the pupil, but while in TDKR Batman wins the war and finally provides peace a second time, Luke… just passes on the torch and says “hey boyos, now that I’ve given you guys hope please clean it up!!”

Yeah but Luke would have had a terrible growlvoice and no thanks.

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:

Collipso said:

So I just watched The Dark Knight and The Dark Knight Rises, and I think that if TLJ treated Luke the same way TDKR treats Batman, it would’ve been a whole lot better.

For example, at the end of both movies, the older hero passes on the torch to the pupil, but while in TDKR Batman wins the war and finally provides peace a second time, Luke… just passes on the torch and says “hey boyos, now that I’ve given you guys hope please clean it up!!”

Yeah but Luke would have had a terrible growlvoice and no thanks.

I laughed.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

chyron8472 said:

chyron8472 said:

Mrebo said:

Dr. Krogshöj said:

Creox said:

yhwx said:

A thing on timelines here: The two main storylines in TLJ start at different times. The escape storyline starts a week after the events of TFA; the Ach-To storyline happens immediately after the events of TFA.

The bomber: People complained about how the bomber thing was unrealistic because there’s no gravity in space. That pedantry is inaccurate. The bombs fell due to the gravitational force of the Star Destroyer underneath the bomber. This is the same reason that Star Destroyer falls into the Death Star in ROTJ.

I read in the visual dictionary that the bombs used magnetic tech as well.

Yes, and that is unnecessary. The artificial gravity within the bomber is enough to give the bombs an initial velocity once they are released to propel them towards the target, as Mrebo already pointed it out.

Also, this obviates the need to talk about the gravity of the ship, which cannot be that significant. I wonder if someone at LFL actually saw a plothole here and came up with magnets or if they were just a cool add-on.

Look, there are plenty of plotholes and mistakes in the OT too if you don’t add EU/Wookieepedia explanations. Contrivances or not, whether it matters to you that it doesn’t make sense on its face comes down to your own choice of whether to just sit back and enjoy it.

For example:

In ANH, when the Blockade Runner’s main reactor was hit and their engines shut down, why didn’t that massive explosion on the side of the ship also knock their trajectory off course or send them spinning out of control?

It was the deflector dish on top that we saw blow up.


Since the Blockade Runner still had power and life support after that, one can argue there was power for attitude control thrusters to keep the ship steady. Or else the Star Destroyer put a tractor beam on them almost immediately.

Why did Luke fall sideways into a tunnel when he let go of the platform at the end of ESB?

There are massive wind currents at play in the Cloud City shaft. We can see this when that window is smashed and Luke is sucked out of it. Luke also may have unwittingly used the Force to guide his fall a bit.

Why did shooting an AT-AT in the neck blow it up only after it fell forward?

The neck armor could have been damaged in the fall, allowing a well placed shot to penetrate and cause an internal explosion.

Why did Han and Leia only have face masks on inside the giant space slug when they assumed it was an empty asteroid with no atmosphere? And why was there sufficient gravity to walk normally on when the asteroid was smaller than our Moon?

Okay, I’m still stumped on this one. It’s a Pinocchio homage? I presume they have sensors to tell them if there’s atmosphere/pressure outside, and the Falcon’s shields could probably create an envelope around the ship. Han also suspected Mynocks before they went outside.

Why was the arm that Ben Kenobi cut off in the cantina furry and clawed when one man was humanoid and the other had flippers?

Continuity error as the arm insert was re-shot much later back in the states. In the workprint footage, Ponda Baba’s arm was still a flipper. They also never anticipated people would notice let alone dissect the film frame by frame. 😉

Why does Shuttle Tydirium that is supposedly transporting parts and crew (by the rebels) to Endor look identical to the shuttle carrying the Emperor himself?

One can argue the Emperor wouldn’t travel in a fancy shuttle that would be easily identified as his ship. Might as well paint a big target on the side otherwise.

et al.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time
 (Edited)

SilverWook said:

chyron8472 said:

chyron8472 said:

Mrebo said:

Dr. Krogshöj said:

Creox said:

yhwx said:

A thing on timelines here: The two main storylines in TLJ start at different times. The escape storyline starts a week after the events of TFA; the Ach-To storyline happens immediately after the events of TFA.

The bomber: People complained about how the bomber thing was unrealistic because there’s no gravity in space. That pedantry is inaccurate. The bombs fell due to the gravitational force of the Star Destroyer underneath the bomber. This is the same reason that Star Destroyer falls into the Death Star in ROTJ.

I read in the visual dictionary that the bombs used magnetic tech as well.

Yes, and that is unnecessary. The artificial gravity within the bomber is enough to give the bombs an initial velocity once they are released to propel them towards the target, as Mrebo already pointed it out.

Also, this obviates the need to talk about the gravity of the ship, which cannot be that significant. I wonder if someone at LFL actually saw a plothole here and came up with magnets or if they were just a cool add-on.

Look, there are plenty of plotholes and mistakes in the OT too if you don’t add EU/Wookieepedia explanations. Contrivances or not, whether it matters to you that it doesn’t make sense on its face comes down to your own choice of whether to just sit back and enjoy it.

For example:

In ANH, when the Blockade Runner’s main reactor was hit and their engines shut down, why didn’t that massive explosion on the side of the ship also knock their trajectory off course or send them spinning out of control?

Why did Luke fall sideways into a tunnel when he let go of the platform at the end of ESB?

Why did shooting an AT-AT in the neck blow it up only after it fell forward?

Why did Han and Leia only have face masks on inside the giant space slug when they assumed it was an empty asteroid with no atmosphere? And why was there sufficient gravity to walk normally on when the asteroid was smaller than our Moon?

Why was the arm that Ben Kenobi cut off in the cantina furry and clawed when one man was humanoid and the other had flippers?

Why does Shuttle Tydirium that is supposedly transporting parts and crew (by the rebels) to Endor look identical to the shuttle carrying the Emperor himself?

One can argue the Emperor wouldn’t travel in a fancy shuttle that would be easily identified as his ship. Might as well paint a big target on the side otherwise.

et al.

Someone should tell Snoke that.

Author
Time

Speaking only for myself, I agree these kinds of things shouldn’t hurt enjoyment of a movie. Someone raised the bomb topic and I gave my two cents on why it shouldn’t be an issue

As joefavs wrote, describing a Cracked podcast, an audience shouldn’t even notice these oddities if they’re sufficiently engaged. So I think the focus on these things is a symptom of lacking engagement more than anything else. And for those people, hopefully they can see that any complaint about the bombs is really nonsensical.

Your point may buttress that, but is not terribly convincing to people who think there is a valid complaint there.

The blue elephant in the room.

Author
Time

Collipso said:

SilverWook said:

chyron8472 said:

chyron8472 said:

Mrebo said:

Dr. Krogshöj said:

Creox said:

yhwx said:

A thing on timelines here: The two main storylines in TLJ start at different times. The escape storyline starts a week after the events of TFA; the Ach-To storyline happens immediately after the events of TFA.

The bomber: People complained about how the bomber thing was unrealistic because there’s no gravity in space. That pedantry is inaccurate. The bombs fell due to the gravitational force of the Star Destroyer underneath the bomber. This is the same reason that Star Destroyer falls into the Death Star in ROTJ.

I read in the visual dictionary that the bombs used magnetic tech as well.

Yes, and that is unnecessary. The artificial gravity within the bomber is enough to give the bombs an initial velocity once they are released to propel them towards the target, as Mrebo already pointed it out.

Also, this obviates the need to talk about the gravity of the ship, which cannot be that significant. I wonder if someone at LFL actually saw a plothole here and came up with magnets or if they were just a cool add-on.

Look, there are plenty of plotholes and mistakes in the OT too if you don’t add EU/Wookieepedia explanations. Contrivances or not, whether it matters to you that it doesn’t make sense on its face comes down to your own choice of whether to just sit back and enjoy it.

For example:

In ANH, when the Blockade Runner’s main reactor was hit and their engines shut down, why didn’t that massive explosion on the side of the ship also knock their trajectory off course or send them spinning out of control?

Why did Luke fall sideways into a tunnel when he let go of the platform at the end of ESB?

Why did shooting an AT-AT in the neck blow it up only after it fell forward?

Why did Han and Leia only have face masks on inside the giant space slug when they assumed it was an empty asteroid with no atmosphere? And why was there sufficient gravity to walk normally on when the asteroid was smaller than our Moon?

Why was the arm that Ben Kenobi cut off in the cantina furry and clawed when one man was humanoid and the other had flippers?

Why does Shuttle Tydirium that is supposedly transporting parts and crew (by the rebels) to Endor look identical to the shuttle carrying the Emperor himself?

One can argue the Emperor wouldn’t travel in a fancy shuttle that would be easily identified as his ship. Might as well paint a big target on the side otherwise.

et al.

Someone should tell Snoke that.

Did we actually see Snoke’s private shuttle? I know Rey escaped in it.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

@SilverWook

It was not my intent to poke holes in the OT. I’m only saying their argument against the bombers not making sense is invalid if they don’t complain about the OT not making sense.

That’s all I’m saying. I’m perfectly willing to accept explanations for these things, but if people are complaining because it should make sense on its face, then explaining it here wouldn’t really make a difference anyway.

TV’s Frink said:

chyron just put a big Ric pic in your sig and be done with it.

Author
Time

No problem. I sometimes think we need a Star Wars version of the Marvel Comics No Prize though. : )

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

chyron8472 said:

@SilverWook

It was not my intent to poke holes in the OT. I’m only saying their argument against the bombers not making sense is invalid if they don’t complain about the OT not making sense.

That’s all I’m saying. I’m perfectly willing to accept explanations for these things, but if people are complaining because it should make sense on its face, then explaining it here wouldn’t really make a difference anyway.

For the record, there are things in the OT that bug me just a tad but they’re overwhelmed by engagement in what’s happening. None of the things you mentioned bother me, and like Wook says, there are good explanations for most of them anyway.

The blue elephant in the room.

Author
Time

SilverWook said:

No problem. I sometimes think we need a Star Wars version of the Marvel Comics No Prize though. : )

Had too look that up, but good idea.

The blue elephant in the room.