yotsuya said:
Mrebo said:
Frank your Majesty said:
Why didn’t the Death Star just jump in a position where it could immediately fire at Yavin 4, instead of circling the planet for half an hour?
I never thought of the Death Star having hyperspace capability. As we try to rationalize travel times in a sciencey way that probably isn’t very realistic. But such is the burden of trying to make space fantasy = science. But let’s follow that thread. I think it very likely that in calculating the hyperspace jump, they didn’t account for the location of the orbit. Some slight additional travel time might be expected (in the movie, half an hour) to adjust, but that’s no big deal. Any jump with something the size of the Death Star would presumably expend a tremendous amount of energy. Just makes sense to finish the last 30 minutes of the journey in normal space.
Getting back to TLJ situation: the chase could go on for another day or longer. I don’t recall if the FO somehow knew exactly how much fuel they had. We know that the ships in question, in the movie, absolutely do have hyperspace capability. That should answer how the two situations are different.
In A New Hope the Falcon jump to hyperspace to escape the Death Star and go to Yavin 4. The Death Star is right behind them and the only way that could happen is if the Death Star has a hyperdrive. It’s there in the original story as it played in 1977. I think the reason is that Capital ships Star Destroyers and larger have a hard time making smaller jumps. And they’d have to time it just right so that the ship they’re chasing doesn’t see them and evade them, so it’s not really a valid flaw that the first order ships didn’t do a mini jump to get ahead of the resistance Cruiser.
ANH isn’t that clear in terms of timeline but I’m cool with the DS having hyperdrive.
The warp issue is not near the top of the list of issues/questions I have.
You guess at one possible solution: big ships can’t jump very accurately at short distances. I admit, that is a reasonable solution even if we must pull it out of our ears.
Where a movie creates a seeming plothole, inconsistency, or oddity - especially something obvious - it’s perfectly reasonable to ask why. The audience might be expected to guess at answers of their own (or just not think about it, which I think is more likely), but for some portion of the audience it won’t be very satisfying or there may be simply too many unanswered elements.
Some have asked - reasonably, I think - why Luke threw the skull to bring the door down on the Rancor rather than using the Force to press it. It’s not something that entered my mind watching it. The reason I see is that Luke was frantic, not thinking, not sufficiently trained in the ways of the Force - basically everything we see on the screen. Whether that works for you, I can’t say.
The lack of warping just kind of hangs out there. I liked the scene with Canady where Kylo calls him out for not sending out fighters. We didn’t have to try to guess that all the fighters were in the repair shop. Canady was caught flat-footed and what could have been a weird oversight was turned into a good moment. It’s that kind of verisimilitude that keeps an audience’s attention, rather than wondering why something that seems obvious wasn’t done.