“What? I can buy a car that will drive me home from the pub when I’m sh*tfaced and I won’t get arrested? No more orange juice. Sign me up. It’s only 99% safe you say? Still sign me up.”
Human nature.
99% safe is still better than most human drivers, though.
I wasn’t making a comparison between the dangers of the two.
I’m saying vulnerability to hacking isn’t going to really factor into people being unwilling to adopt driver-less-cars (which was the original point I was replying to) because it doesn’t seem to really factor into most people buying any other device/product.
I think we agree on their relative safety.