Oprah stands way more of a chance than Lincoln Chaffee.
Perhaps.
If Oprah stands zero chance, how could she stand more chance than Lincoln Chaffee?
You don’t see the problem with your arguments here?
The problem is you equate the use of of the phrase “no chance” in common conversation as equal to “zero probability” in practical statistics. You assume a hyperbolic statement is not hyperbolic, and so you refute it as though it isn’t, and in a way that rudely belittles my opinions in general.