This definitely needed to be dredged up again.
You do realize that not everyone checks the forums all day everyday, and that when you click on a thread it takes you to your earliest unread post, right?
So people reading through what they’ve missed so far might have input on something somebody said. It’s not unreasonable.
Yes, let’s just revive all the crap that has been resolved days ago, just because some people can’t first read through a thread and then post. This kind of redundancy is the reason why there are so many new pages every day in the first place.
But he was replying to something from only 7 hours prior, not days. With that logic no one can post in the morning, go to work, and reply after work to a conversation they missed.
If it’s only seven hours, there’s also less new posts to catch up on, right? And if a mod already stepped in, there is no need to further defend oneself. All it does is revive the argument.