Citing equality doesn’t really fit, because they are not equal. Saying a woman should be paid as much as a man because a woman’s ability or intelligence is equal is not the same thing as saying women’s bodies, which are not identical to men’s, should be treated identically. Having a woman cover her breasts does not lower her social standing or make her to be inferior to a man.
Let’s turn the tables. Is the argument that a certain part of a man’s body should be censored because it’s different from that part on a woman a valid argument to you?
I don’t think it is censored because it different. I think there are reasons other than simply it being different as to why it is censored, and those reasons are potentially sound.
Women’s breasts aren’t just different-and-that’s-it. Men have sexual responses to them. Women have clothing that accentuates them. Women and men both treat women’s physical bodies differently than women and men both treat men’s bodies. Women have different attractions to men than men do to women, and so arguing that men’s bodies and women’s bodies should be treated equally (or identically) “because” isn’t reason enough to not treat the differently.
You don’t think women have sexual responses to men’s exposed chests?
are now going to try to tell me that women’s sexual responses to men’s exposed chests = men’s sexual responses to women’s exposed chests?
And now you’re suddenly the expert on women’s sexual response to men’s bodies.
I am not an expert but I will bet my life savings that
women’s sexual responses to men’s exposed chests ≠ men’s sexual responses to women’s exposed chests?
Source? That’s quite the generalization.
A little bit, but there are different standards of beauty around the world. In other cultures, female breasts aren’t considered nearly as erotic as they are in the Western world. The ideal weight for a man and a woman also changes around the world. It’s not just biology. It’s culture too.
but it is partly biology.
Sure, but a lot less than people think it is.