Citing equality doesn’t really fit, because they are not equal. Saying a woman should be paid as much as a man because a woman’s ability or intelligence is equal is not the same thing as saying women’s bodies, which are not identical to men’s, should be treated identically. Having a woman cover her breasts does not lower her social standing or make her to be inferior to a man.
Let’s turn the tables. Is the argument that a certain part of a man’s body should be censored because it’s different from that part on a woman a valid argument to you?
I don’t think it is censored because it different. I think there are reasons other than simply it being different as to why it is censored, and those reasons are potentially sound.
Women’s breasts aren’t just different-and-that’s-it. Men have sexual responses to them. Women have clothing that accentuates them. Women and men both treat women’s physical bodies differently than women and men both treat men’s bodies. Women have different attractions to men than men do to women, and so arguing that men’s bodies and women’s bodies should be treated equally (or identically) “because” isn’t reason enough to not treat the differently.
You don’t think women have sexual responses to men’s exposed chests?
Yes, but perhaps not in the same way. And that also assumes all women have the same response as all other women, which is probably not true either.
Part of the reason why men have such pent up attraction to breasts is by the nature that most of the time they are concealed
Perhaps. Perhaps not. Perhaps men like being attracted to them. Perhaps women like men liking to be attracted to them.
Ever wonder why dudes used to go crazy over legs?
They still do in some cultures. I’m saying cultural acceptance of a norm is not unfair per se.
There are cultural norms that equate women as being inferior. I’m saying covering breasts is not one of them.