When it happens to you somebody important asks us to stop and we reluctantly do, eventually. Now you’re being asked to stop, and as far as I can tell you’re not being threatened with being banned or anything, so I guess you’re just still in the reluctant stage.

Also, frink has a point. Look through the forum and you will see no less than 3 batman threads started by the sane person. Nobody is saying he doesn’t have a right to talk about batman to his heart’s content. All we are saying is to pick one of the threads he’s already created on the subject and stick with that thread. It’s a perfectly reasonable request, and your attempt to turn the needle back on the groove of the record where the verse goes something about frink trying to control the forum is just unnecessary, because it’s totally reasonable.

Also it was me that first said he should use one of the threads he already made. And nobody said spuffy had to listen to us or that he had to post on this thread. But he chose to post on this thread, so shouldn’t feedback be welcome, since feedback on new thread idea is basically this threads purpose? It’s not as if spuffy HAD to ask here first. But he did, and so we have our opinion. All frink asked, at first, was to stay on topic. Seeing as the thread is voluntary it’s reasonable. It was only when you disobeyed that he asked you to stay out of the thread. Which you also disobeyed. I’m not trying to call for you to get in trouble or anything, just asking that you look at this particular instance in a more objective might as I think your feelings have clouded your judgement with how you’re reading the thread.