logo Sign In

Post #1056740

Author
Ryan-SWI
Parent topic
'97 vs. '04 (and '11) - Your preference?
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1056740/action/topic#1056740
Date created
17-Mar-2017, 3:03 AM

TV’s Frink said:

Ryan-SWI said:

imperialscum said:

while 04 and 11 were just an excuse to insert PT crap into OT.

I’d argue the same is true for 97, albeit to a lesser extent.

What PT stuff is in the 97 edition?

I was mainly referring to Coruscant, which is debatable, and CGI Jabba, which I believe was a test for CG Jabba in TPM (I’m sure I remember seeing a quote from Lucas about it, I could be mistaken though). They’re not direct PT links but I suppose you could make a case for some of the changes only being there because of the PT. It doesn’t really matter though, PT or not most of the stand-out visual changes are garbage.

Look, for once we should all come together and agree that the SEs all suck.

I mean I don’t mind the removal of some pretty bad matte lines/boxes and such and the SE Cloud City is kinda cool, but there’s not much else good to be found.

I don’t even think some of the more pointless changes would bother me so much if they weren’t so lazy.
Why does R2 hide behind rocks that vanish in the next shot?
Why is the outside door to Jabba’s Palace so huge but inside it’s tiny?
If you’re going to pump money into crappy distracting CGI at least make it consistent.