you have not done anything wrong but video will definitely be produced only in 10 bit color depth from now on whilst previously a lot of content was produced in 8 bit color depth. This produced Color Banding and solid gradients sometimes in some video sources.
8 bit depth was a mistake really.
To process 10 bit color depth and a high contrast you need to have a display that can handle it. If you want to get a New TV only get one that is labelled “ULtra HD premium” anything else is not of any Standard of HDR. A TV can exceed the standard also of Ultra HD premium.
I would not bother getting a 12 bit color depth display though either. The LCD panel needs to be 10 bit native not 8 bit dithered to be proper HDR.
There is very little demand for 4K video. there is a demand for an improved image and more detail better contrast more color range. Nobody want’s to stream 4k video to everyone it stupid and unrealistic and to be able to do that it’s very demanding.
all of these improvements that can be done without the massive burden of 4k for which you need a massive screen to get the benefit from anyway also and which most people don’t have the space for either. And the infrastructure for the needed bandwidth is not there either to do it and provide the service for everyone. It’s also a stretch for broadcast nobody is going to be able to get 4k down a normal aerial.
There is however everything right with scanning old films in 4k and with a higher exposure. And then displaying it on a TV with HDR at whatever resolution is needed for the size of your room / screen.
I would suggest this is the way forward for most people. Average everyday people that is.
http://www.techradar.com/news/sony-is-bringing-hdr-to-its-1080p-tvs-but-only-ps4-owners-will-benefit
I didn’t know anyone was making regular 1080p tvs with hdr. In fact, I thought the tv manufacturers had ceased making 1080p panels altogether. Very interesting.
By the way, 1080p hdr broadcasts will apparently become more of a thing in the near future according to an article I saw the other day. Apparently the industry determined that signals could be bumped up to 1080p and hdr using existing hardware whereas a complete overhaul would be necessary just to get 4k (even without hdr).
This is exactly the case and that although 4k is no doubt great if you have a very large TV there is really no need for me to buy a 4k TV as I currently have a measly 23" screen actually it’s a nice LCD with a good contrast ratio and It’s a nice picture.
But I will never buy a 4K TV for where I live because I simply do not have the space and they are all 40"+. I would invest in a Ultra HD player buy discs and display them in 1080p or 1080i and enjoy HDR yes please.
I think there really is no where for 4k to run at this point apart from yeah big telly UHD with HDR small Telly HD with HDR.
UHD Blu ray player yeah it works with both.
New Star Wars release 4k HDR works with both UHD telly and HD HDR telly
But how much HDR? Full HDR has specs and you also have Dolby Vision which exceeds that HDR10 is current spec Dolby vision sounds much much better but it’s being made too elite.
Dolby Vision need to get in with a half way house measure as their method honestly sounds brilliant and it’s a really cool idea. Dolby Vision on 12bit color depth should adopt a 10bit color depth model and stop being so elite. They need to get their foot in the door and stop being stubborn.
HDR is the new tech and it will roll out with very little change to existing broadcast technology the oweness will be on the owner for the telly the provider for the content.