Discussion About the New Forum Rules (Also: Frink's Avatars) (Was: For those of you who want to be rid of me, you might get your wish sooner than you thought) :: 1 > 3

  • Reply
  • Print
bkev's avatar
RE: For those of you who want to be rid of me, you might get your wish sooner than you thought

Why now? That's really all I have to say. Did I miss a huge breakout in Ady's thread again?

Warbler's avatar
RE: For those of you who want to be rid of me, you might get your wish sooner than you thought

Frink, there is no reason for you to leave.   From what Jay said, you can still do whatever you want in off topic.   Just behave yourself in the rest of the forum is all.   Please don't go, Frink.  I'd hate to see another of my friends leave

ChainsawAsh's avatar
RE: For those of you who want to be rid of me, you might get your wish sooner than you thought

Just confine your brand of wacky humor to the off-topic section, and you should be good, right?

I have faith in you, Frink.

Warbler's avatar
RE: For those of you who want to be rid of me, you might get your wish sooner than you thought

but there is no reason for you to be banned.  Nothing has changed in off topic.   All you have to do is follow the rules that Jay set down for the rest of the forum.  

Warbler's avatar
RE: For those of you who want to be rid of me, you might get your wish sooner than you thought

I don't know.    We will just have to see.   You could PM Jay and Moth3r and ask them how strict they will enforce the rules.  

I am surprised by the change in Jay's policies.   Anyone know what caused it? 

bkev's avatar
RE: For those of you who want to be rid of me, you might get your wish sooner than you thought

I have a completely biased guess that I won't share because there's no real basis.

Gaffer Tape's avatar
RE: For those of you who want to be rid of me, you might get your wish sooner than you thought

Yeah, this thing really surprised me.  I wonder what caused it.

There is no lingerie in space...

C3PX said: Gaffer is like that hot girl in high school that you think you have a chance with even though she is way out of your league because she is sweet and not a stuck up bitch who pretends you don't exist... then one day you spot her making out with some skinny twerp, only on second glance you realize it is the goth girl who always sits in the back of class; at that moment it dawns on you why she is never seen hanging off the arm of any of the jocks... and you realize, damn, she really is unobtainable after all. Not that that is going to stop you from dreaming... Only in this case, Gaffer is actually a guy.

Chewtobacca's avatar
RE: For those of you who want to be rid of me, you might get your wish sooner than you thought

I agree with Warbler, Frink.  Just try really hard to keep it in off topic.  I would hate to see you leave or be banned. 

It is a shame that the rules cannot be enforced a little less strictly in the general Star Wars discussion forum because there are always some threads there that are just asking to be Frinked.  I do think that the off topic posts in threads devoted to specific projects should be curtailed though.

Johnny Ringo's avatar
RE: For those of you who want to be rid of me, you might get your wish sooner than you thought

c'mon... everyone is guilty of going off topic at one time or another.


Anchorhead
 said:

look at Johnny Ringo, man.  If I had to go against that guy it would be an Indiana Jones\Dovchenko event - and I'd be hoping like hell for a bunch of ants.

Chewtobacca's avatar
RE: For those of you who want to be rid of me, you might get your wish sooner than you thought

Johnny Ringo said:

c'mon... everyone is guilty of going off topic at one time or another.

If that is meant for me, then I agree that I am guilty of this too, but I do try to stay on topic in the project threads.

Bingowings' avatar
RE: For those of you who want to be rid of me, you might get your wish sooner than you thought

In the thread mentioned Moth3r would normally have deleted the thread as spam but gave you and others permission to 'play with things a while before annihilation' (I can't remember if this was before or after he ordered us not to reply to any spam posts because it was making his life hellish).

Perhaps if you are in doubt you could use some sort of 'safe word' (or PM).

I doubt if you would get banned for dipping your toe off topic, hunting for Red October off topic would probably be pursued with extreme prejudice though.

Personal attacks could be a tricky one (most of the time it's obvious but sometimes one persons personal attack is another person's illustrating the point you just made with picture of a Time Lord surrounded by zombies).

If the Off Topic section is still a relatively hands free area as some of the people on this thread seem to think than the position is clear...don't do it elsewhere.

What about off the cuff remarks about George's neck?

Sure he isn't a member but it's pretty much a personal remark which may offend some people who would see it as an attack.

I don't know where this leaves things like stay on target!, the memory cheats, Actual Movie Still and Actual Movie Sequence cards?

They are often on topic but single images which convey concepts in a clear way without the need for space wasting words.

If someone were to banned for that then there should be people banned for oversized images and the forums will empty very quickly.

I would be interested to see how this plays out because sometime project threads can get bogged down by this sort of thing but sometimes it keeps threads current and a new burst of creativity can explode out of the silliest jokes.

If this became the sort of place where odd-ball zany irreverence became unwelcome I'd sell my landspeeder anyway.

I wouldn't need to be banned.

Last edited on October 26, 2010 at 11:30 AM by Bingowings

  • Anál nathrach,
    orth’ bháis’s bethad,
    do chél dénmha
Leonardo's avatar
RE: For those of you who want to be rid of me, you might get your wish sooner than you thought

Bingowings said:

What about off the cuff remarks about George's neck?

Sure he isn't a member but it's pretty much a personal remark which may offend some people who would see it as an attack.

I don't know, I see it as, like, saying to a friend or an acquaintance "That toupée looks like a dead cat on your head." or "That shirt looks like crap.", or "You should really diet, you look fat, it's not good for your health."

Sure, somebody might get offended, but it's meant as a well meaning criticism. At least IMHO.

  

 

... And they had 'The Empire Strikes Back', the fifth of the four Star Wars films. He is fucking with us numerically, isn't he! "Children, count up to ten." "Four, five, six, one, two, three, ten". No, it goes, four, five, six, one, two, three… No, it goes: four, five, six. One... Two and three have not been made." "Two and three have not been made! What should they be?" "What should they be? We do not know. All we know is that there will be a big floppy character in it that goes, squawk squawk squawk... who needs a punch up the bracket!"

zombie84's avatar
RE: For those of you who want to be rid of me, you might get your wish sooner than you thought

Frink, I don't think you will be banned or punished the second you make some kind of sarcastic remark or off-topic reference. Everyone does that here and its part of the off-the-cuff charm that makes non-preservation discussion entertaining at OT.com. I think its just a warning about doing this chronically without ever contributing anything worthwhile to a discussion. I have to say you are often guilty of this and sometimes it gets a bit old. But if you got in trouble for any "technical" breach of this new rule then we'd all be in trouble as well, and obviously this is not going to happen. So I would say just be yourself but take it down a few notches in areas where it otherwise might impose upon more "informative" discussion, or whatever.

Last edited on October 26, 2010 at 3:13 PM by zombie84

The Secret History of Star Wars -- now available on Amazon.com!

"When George went back and put new creatures into the original Star Wars, I find that disturbing. It’s a revision of history. That bothers me."

--James Cameron, Entertainment Weekly, April 2010

Darth Solo's avatar
RE: For those of you who want to be rid of me, you might get your wish sooner than you thought

Have you recived a warning as of yet?? If so you just need to curb your behaviour from there on. Or just stick to Off Topic and continue mayhem as usual.

Last edited on October 26, 2010 at 3:25 PM by Darth Solo

Who is the most foolish, the fool, or the fool which follows it?

Also fought in the clown wars, many years ago..and lost..miserably..

Darth Solo's avatar
RE: For those of you who want to be rid of me, you might get your wish sooner than you thought

Paranoid at all? Now you know whats its like to post in your currently about thread. The cry of PROBATION! hunts me.

#4 is a stinker i admit as it causes major LOLs in threads.

I stopped my BS in Adys thread a long time ago because i could see the extent of the other none related rubbish building up as a result. Now Adys thread is plagued by BS. I just brought my shit underground (which apparently still okay).

Last edited on October 26, 2010 at 4:33 PM by Darth Solo

Who is the most foolish, the fool, or the fool which follows it?

Also fought in the clown wars, many years ago..and lost..miserably..

Leonardo's avatar
RE: For those of you who want to be rid of me, you might get your wish sooner than you thought

Darth Solo said:

Paranoid much?

fixed

  

 

... And they had 'The Empire Strikes Back', the fifth of the four Star Wars films. He is fucking with us numerically, isn't he! "Children, count up to ten." "Four, five, six, one, two, three, ten". No, it goes, four, five, six, one, two, three… No, it goes: four, five, six. One... Two and three have not been made." "Two and three have not been made! What should they be?" "What should they be? We do not know. All we know is that there will be a big floppy character in it that goes, squawk squawk squawk... who needs a punch up the bracket!"

Members reading this topic: None