none
This user is offline.
Mielr wrote: The Han video was linked to in a CNN.com article once, though.
This is very good. One of the fair use/dealing copyright exemptions is news reportage. Find that link and send it to the reporter, might be able to make a story out of it. And if you wish to fight the take down, mentioning this fact could make the FOX counter irrelevant.
Are you able to still modify the video, for instance can you make the comment return? Or does the take down also take down comments.... The comments in that video really showed off the fandom split, shame these stupid phucking asshole corporations would want to take that information out of the public sphere. short sighted idiots. yeah it might not be anything important in the grand scheme, but it's a sign that too much is under their control and out of the publics. /rant
about 1,300 places linked to the video.
https://www.google.com/search?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3De1YbFnkZwZk&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a
Mielr
This user is offline.
yavasizadooWhen I click on the link from my youtube user page, I still see the video and the comments, but I can't download it. The fandom split is also quite clear in the ROTJ clip (which is still up-for now). That one, for some reason, has 300,000 more hits than the Han vid did.
![]()
R.I.P. "Creamy" 2002(?) - 08/01/2010
Davnes007
This user is offline.
The one who keeps all of your secrets!I have one question about this sort of thing.
One of my old videos, "Darth Vader Unmasked" has a 'Matched Third Party Content' thing associated with it from FuturaNetworks.
So...who the hell is FuturaNetworks?...And why that video?
(A Google search isn't quite helpful in this matter...yet)
The ONLY bit in it, that isn't from Star Wars, is George Lucas' face used from an interview with Seth MacFarlane (in relation to 'Family Guy Star Wars').
- DnE
Star Wars Episode XXX: Erica Strikes Back


If you want Nice....go to France.
none
This user is offline.
Alternative:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0SVJsadM6FI (2007.03.17)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGpuM_VJDQ4 (2008.01.29)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2xetg3em8Y (2010.11.17)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-qWoTWd_nRw (2011.07.29)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5oBtcXz6x0 (2006.03.27)
Version to make you angry:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kgG6T6-CrN0 (2010.08.08)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vfo9cAvUQTo (2011.08.10)
version attributed to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Han_shot_first
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKxjQYTMk48 (2011.01.09)
Mielr wrote: When I click on the link from my youtube user page, I still see the video and the comments, but I can't download it. The fandom split is also quite clear in the ROTJ clip (which is still up-for now). That one, for some reason, has 300,000 more hits than the Han vid did.
Where on the globe are you? Maybe it's a US region block. To download a copy you can use sites like http://keep-tube.com/ and if you're game, you can load all comments then save the page (think it does a couple hundred comments per page, so maybe 5-10 pages total) to preserve it in some fashion. I'd take a copy of that. (saved the SW crawl, ESB and RotJ comments, if you'd like them.)
Tobar
This user is online.
Wait for me. I shall be merciful and quick.Wasn't quite sure where to put this. It's an article I just stumbled on:
George Lucas: Stop Ruining Our Childhood
A pretty well written article. Two guesses as to the kind of reaction it's received in the comments section.
Join Space Command and then help back Jack Houston and the Necronauts!
TV's Frink
This user is offline.
Ointment Fly+1 for the use of "ruining" instead of "raping."
DuracellEnergizer
This user is offline.
Ce n'est pas DuracellEnergizerGeorge Luca$ rapped my childhood (on the head).
God doesn't think in terms of black or white - or even shades of gray - but in big, bright, bold hues of blue and orange.
greenpenguino
This user is offline.
Double standards!!George Lucas didn't rape my childhood, but he did disappoint my teen-hood.
I'm the forums younger clone of TVs' Frink. Except sillier and more handsomer...