reave
This user is offline.
FE<3OTWow, that's pretty damn cool, Moth3r. I would be willing to watch it like that, if only just to satisfy my crippling OCD about the real differences in the "censored" versions and making a somewhat definitive documentation of the changes.
How sensitive is your method? Will it assuredly detect any noticeable difference? Does it give many false positives? I'm really intrigued by this.
![]()
Space Kaijuu
This user is offline.
Very nice script, Moth3r. I'm working on decensoring the Baby Herman "goosing" near the beginning, the Betty Boop nip-slip, and the Jessica Rabbit panty flash. Those are the only changes I've found so far. If anyone finds any other differences between the version, I'll be happy to add them to the list.
TServo2049
This user is offline.
This space for rentLook for a one-frame phone number on the Toontown bathroom wall. It's supposedly under the "For a good time, call Allison Wonderland" graffiti. This is one that's been rumored, but nobody has ever come forth with visual proof of.
I wouldn't be surprised if the rumor turns out to B.S., but I always assumed that about Betty Boop's nipples and I was proven wrong there. (And as I said before, Disney did cut out Tim Allen's phone sex number joke from The Santa Clause after the original VHS and laserdisc, because "1-800-SPANK-ME" turned out to be a real number for a real phone sex hotline.)
monks19
This user is offline.
Space Kaijuu
This user is offline.
I already checked for the phone number in the French version and saw no sign of it. That one was always dubious at best, though.
The running commentary actually mentioned the Betty Boop nipple flash and pointed out that it was a reference to the fact that it was taken from the original BB shorts where the animators regularly hid naughty single-frame gags like that.
As far as the altered frames, I'm using the blu-ray and French versions and reconstructing the single frames in Photoshop to replace the altered frames.
I'm about halfway through the baby herman goosing segment and I have the Betty Boop frame done.
reave
This user is offline.
FE<3OTcan you share a sample clip?
![]()
Space Kaijuu
This user is offline.
All I have are the decompressed video and the single frames at the moment. I finished the work on the Baby Herman scene, so now I just need to work on the infamous Jessica Rabbit scene, which will take a few days since it was the most extensive edit of the three.
diarma86
This user is offline.
You said you wanted to check out more possible edits, IMDB forums have something that has not been discussed here yet, and I don't know if it is true or not, but you would be the man to ask....
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0096438/board/nest/212271838?p=1
monks19
This user is offline.
You said you wanted to check out more possible edits, IMDB forums have something that has not been discussed here yet, and I don't know if it is true or not, but you would be the man to ask....
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0096438/board/nest/212271838?p=1
Well I'm sure that if we can get a clear image of the "Rigid Tools" poster, some of us can recreate it & re-insert it in the HD version. All it takes now is to find a good image of it. By the way, it's been discussed on another forum titled "Do theese films need preservation ?".
TServo2049
This user is offline.
This space for rentIf anyone wants to spend a hundred bucks, there's a 16mm scope print of Trail Mix-Up on eBay. It's not 35mm, but it could still yield a sharper (albeit grainier) image than the laserdisc.
nirbateman
This user is offline.
That scope print is cropped, the version on the Bluray looks excellent, and in the OAR.
TServo2049
This user is offline.
This space for rentYes, but doesn't the Blu-ray transfer still blur the "Rigid Tools" pinup in the sawmill, like the DVD version did? My point was that an unblurred image could be isolated from the print, and it would mesh better with the HD than a blowup from the laserdisc.
nirbateman
This user is offline.
Perhaps, but cost-efficiency wise, buying a full 16 mm print, just for a few frames, is not very sound.
Mackey256
This user is offline.

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-mhdiFRFf6Hg/TbIiNRWmYxI/AAAAAAAADOk/451hTuGf_1A/s1600/rigid.jpg
I just wanted to post this for reference.
"You know, when you think about it, the Ewoks probably just crap over the sides of their tree-huts."
nirbateman
This user is offline.
And here is roughly the same frame from the bluray.
The funny thing is, that although it is blurred, you can clearly see Jessica's features and hair.

Mackey256
This user is offline.
Just for fun. :)

"You know, when you think about it, the Ewoks probably just crap over the sides of their tree-huts."
diarma86
This user is offline.
TBH I was wondering wth the IMDB forum guys were talking about, so thanks for the pictures. So sad that Disney is so anal. It's a funny advert.
TServo2049
This user is offline.
This space for rentIt's also a parody of real pinup ads for tool company Ridgid from back in the day. And yes, they were just as unsubtle:

Space Kaijuu
This user is offline.
The Rigid Tools poster wouldn't be too hard to reinsert into the original since it's only a few frames in the animation and it's part of the background painting rather than some sort of cell or animation element. Is the image above the best that's out there, or are there any higher resolution frame captures?
I'm about halfway done restoring the altered frames from the Jessica Rabbit panty shot scene. The latest edit to the scene actually removes the panties from her butt and makes it look even more like she's not wearing panties than the original did. Seriously, Disney?
Doctor M
This user is offline.
Jedi KnightSpace Kaijuu said:
The Rigid Tools poster wouldn't be too hard to reinsert into the original since it's only a few frames in the animation and it's part of the background painting rather than some sort of cell or animation element. Is the image above the best that's out there, or are there any higher resolution frame captures?
I'm about halfway done restoring the altered frames from the Jessica Rabbit panty shot scene. The latest edit to the scene actually removes the panties from her butt and makes it look even more like she's not wearing panties than the original did. Seriously, Disney?
Love to see the screenshot comparison there.
Mackey256
This user is offline.
Space Kaijuu said:
Is the image above the best that's out there, or are there any higher resolution frame captures?
The screen shot I posted above is what I found after a quick Google search. I had no idea what people were talking about and figured others might not so I posted that image.
There may be better captures out there but that was the first one that I found.
"You know, when you think about it, the Ewoks probably just crap over the sides of their tree-huts."
Space Kaijuu
This user is offline.
It looks like the DVD may have left one frame unblurred. I don't have the DVD version of the short to verify this, though.
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-4Jxi3Ku0rnI/TaDVOgnbBwI/AAAAAAAADHM/YplVoHTqLS4/s1600/RogerRigidTools.jpg
I've got all the Jessica Rabbit frames restored. Now I just need to find time to insert the restored frames back into the film and render it out. I'll post screenshots when I get a chance to upload them.
TServo2049
This user is offline.
This space for rentWow, you revealed something interesting. The new HD version basically blocks out the poster entirely (with only vestiges of the detail left), and the old DVD version just fuzzed it out.
Perhaps the uncensored portion from that one frame could be mixed with the LD version, or the luma from the LD could be combined with the chroma from the DVD?
monks19
This user is offline.
Ok, can somebody here, who does have the LD with the uncensored short, post a very good quality screen caps. of the frames containing the poster ? At leas it will be much better that the screen caps. posted earlyer and found with google.
Space Kaijuu
This user is offline.
It's part of the background painting, so it shouldn't change size and shape much from one frame to another. If I had enough different screenshots of different frames featuring the poster, the image could probably be reconstructed to some degree.