ray_afraid
This user is offline.
Twisted & EvilTheBoost said:
ray_afraid said:
TheBoost said:
Ricky Nelson?!!?
Whats wrong with Ricky Nelson. I'm a fan.
I was just surprised that a middle-schooler knew who Ricky Nelson was. I'm actually impressed.
Ahh ok. I knew I liked you.
zombie84
This user is offline.
Jedi KnightI posted this in my saveSW thread, but I wrote to Congress to clarify if it was the original, and if it was a new or existing print. Good news. 1) It's the original. 2) It will be a newly struck print.
Michael: In reference to the question, we always recognize and seek to ensure preservation of the original theatrical release version, per the legislation (which says the Registry version is "the version of a film first published")., though we might also try to obtain other versions as well. This would apply even in cases where we might prefer a different version (i.e. where a studio butchered a director's film before release).
Tho we recognize the original, we have no problem with the filmmaker going back and releasing a modified version (that is their right after all). We would want to see all versions preserved well.
After the recent selection, we will in the near future request that Fox/Lucasfilm strike and send us a new 35mm print of the original 1980 release version. We do that for all the studio titles, and the studios do cooperate.
Best, Steve Leggett
The Secret History of Star Wars -- now available on Amazon.com!
"When George went back and put new creatures into the original Star Wars, I find that disturbing. It’s a revision of history. That bothers me."
--James Cameron, Entertainment Weekly, April 2010
bkev
This user is offline.
See You, Space Cowboy...Yes! Good to know.
Fang Zei
This user is offline.
I am ready for the trials!This is fantastic news!
I noticed that Electronic Labyrinth, Lucas' student short that became THX 1138, was also inducted this (last) year.
Moth3r
This user is offline.
Better Grumpy than Dopeyzombie84 said:
I posted this in my saveSW thread, but I wrote to Congress to clarify if it was the original, and if it was a new or existing print. Good news. 1) It's the original. 2) It will be a newly struck print.
[...]
After the recent selection, we will in the near future request that Fox/Lucasfilm strike and send us a new 35mm print of the original 1980 release version. We do that for all the studio titles, and the studios do cooperate.
Indeed good news, assuming:
1) Fox/Lucasfilm do indeed cooperate
2) Someone at the Registry actually checks to ensure they haven't tried to sneak in an SE print...
Darth Id
This user is offline.
Only a master of evilPrint struck from what?
That would be sad if the archived, armageddon-proof version was struck from a rushed, sloppy internegative, in turn transferred from an abused, degraded interpositive.
And if it will be from the O-Neg...that will be a big 'a-ha!-it-does-exist.'
Harmy
This user is offline.
Han D. SoloYeah, I was thinking the same thing, from the way the last interpositives made for the OOT looked when they were transfered to video in 1993, they have to be awful by now...
Pennsylvania Jones said:
"Stick and Stones will break my bones but the Blu-Rays will never Harmy."
Lucas: I am altering the film. Pray I don't alter it any further.
Fans: This film is getting worse all the time!
TheBoost
This user is offline.
Better a bad bomb than a bombadMoth3r said:
Indeed good news, assuming:
1) Fox/Lucasfilm do indeed cooperate
2) Someone at the Registry actually checks to ensure they haven't tried to sneak in an SE print...
This is a real test. It's one thing to say "to hell with you" to your fans, but is Lucas so bold as to say to hell with the Library of Congress!!