PSYCHO_DAYV said:

I REALLY COULD'VE CARED LESS UNTIL twooffour STARTED PROVING FRINK RIGHT IN THIS VERY THREAD.

 

DONE.

Interesting.

He accuses me of trolling - arguing with people solely to get angry reactions.
And somehow, I'm proving him right by... posting in his thread aimed against me.

Yea, I really like to start trouble do I not... what is it with people and logic these days?

Gaffer Tape said:

Hmm.  I'll have to think about this one for a bit, Frinky.  On the one hand, you're absolutely right.  Twooffour is probably one of the most obstinate, delusional, arrogant, annoying, convinced-of-his-own-infallibility people I've ever had the displeasure of communicating with since my ex-fiancee, and considering that she just sent me a half-assed "apology" accompanied by a long, rambling letter of why she was still, in spite of that, completely right and justified about everything anyway... wait, what were we talking about again?

Oh, yeah.  On the other hand, yes, I've already long since stopped bothering to communicate with him.  Makes me feel all icky inside.  But I admit I do get some jollies in watching people like Frink and Mrebo debate with him and watching the hijinks ensue and the crazy rationalizing come out of his keyboard.  It will be a shame to see that go away, although I can understand why Frink has finally thrown up his arms and decided it wasn't worth the effort, since, as I just said, I went through the same process.

So all of that said... I'm not sure if I'll take the pledge of not.  But I'm certainly leaning in favor of it. =P

"and considering that she just sent me a half-assed "apology" accompanied by a long, rambling letter of why she was still, in spite of that, completely right and justified about everything anyway."

What, are you lesbian?


Anyway, what a laughable post.
Questions like who in a debate is delusional, "convinced" of (rather than witnessing) their own "infallibility" (or should I say, correctness in a given situation), or "rationalizing" (rather than being rational and making sense) - are decided with, guess what? ARGUMENTS.

If you think someone is delusional or wrong, you should MAKE A CASE for that.
Now I don't remember our last argument, but I'm pretty sure I've made lots and lots of cases against your points and tactics - tons of unintentional irony, hypocrisy, failure to comprehend a post, and and and.
You haven't managed to do ANY of that, in fact you've always got lost and lost track, while getting terribly pissed and abusive (far more than myself at the time).


So for you to sit here, backed up by the false security of other users nodding at your post in agreement, and make empty claims about my fallacies and thought failures, means, precisely... dick.

Anyone can say "you're wrong and delusional lol" - far less can actually make a case for that without looking like buffoons themselves (and failing to make the case while at it).
Pick any of our exchanges, I'll most probably do just that - I know because I already have.

TV's Frink said:

RedFive said:

Just the fact that it's come to this is sad. 

I agree.  It could have gone a bunch of other ways, all of which I would have preferred.

Added.

So let's examine one of those "ways you would've preferred", shall we?

It's one I've already articulated here... ready? NOT HAVING STARTED THIS DEBACLE IN THE FIRST PLACE.
After having started, you could've at least avoided popping in random threads to say hi.

That obviously would've been a far more dignified way of handling the situation, than this hilarious soap opera of people "pledging" and "vowing" to do something they could've done silently from the start, without all the ham.

But you obviously weren't able to do that. So I guess starting a dramatic thread is the only resort you've got left to keep your hilarious childish tics at bay - but hey, better than the previous variant for sure ;)


(Wink smiley means Wink, btw; don't respond)

bkev said:

 

twooffour said:

spite of that, completely right and justified about everything anyway.[/i]"

What, are you lesbian?

he's a man, everybody just thinks he's as beautiful as the Princess.

Also, I'm terribly sorry to hear about your fiancee Gaff. I didn't even know you HAD one.

 

Ah... well, then... last time I'd apparently offended Betty here (and a few others) by calling him a he... so... I'm not even gonna ask. Just... whatever :)

I officially disrespect all of your genders from this point on. With Bible in hand, and Ham.

Summary of this thread:

"We're a bunch of children who couldn't stop ourselves from creating a huge silly fuss out of nothing, all the time. So we have to accomplish that by giving each other vows and pledges like in an addiction support group."

This comparison makes even more sense when you consider how Alcoholics Anonymous are best advised to never touch any alcohol, ever, again -- in contrast to normal people who can take a healthy, regular dose with ease, and don't even have to give it much thought, let alone reassure each other that they'll stay true to their "vows" at all times... in the future.

Heh.
Not a huge problem really, just wondered whether you realized how this all comes off... ah, now you do. Well, perfect :D




________________________

I knew as soon as I wrote that that you were going to say that.  And as I've said many times before, for someone whose primary shtick is complaining that people don't read your posts, you sure as hell don't read, do you? (hint: look down at the bottom of every single one of my posts like C3PX and I have been constantly telling you to)  But, damnit all if bkev didn't already give the game away.  Darn.  We were having fun too, watching him constantly get that wrong despite us very obviously pointing him in the right direction every single time. =P

As a matter of fact, I had actually read that sig a couple times, but I took it as some kind of inside joke / jab, and just shrugged.
Please tell me how I was supposed to know it was meant seriously (just the last line, actually)?

What I remember, though, was both of you telling me straight ahead that you're a woman. So I took that as the "truth".


It's funny to see how you're trying to sneak in a score here, but sorry, you fail HARD.
When I complain about you or someone else not reading my posts, it's always specifically referring to you... responding to my post, while blatantly overlooking or going over something of relevance.

I'm not supposed to search the entire forum for people's contradictory, humorous gender claims, and I'm also not expected to read everyone's signature, or take them seriously - seeing as how 80% of signatures are mostly jokes, and yours is written like one, too.

So no, you don't get to accuse me of reading failure here. Sorry. I know you wanted to.

Anyway, the rest of twooffour's post is just his usual "I'm not the problem, every single other person in the entire world is," tirade that, if I'm not mistaken, is what keeps proving Frink's point to everyone.

Well, you are mistaken.
Frink's point was that I was TROLLING (a point long debunked), and claiming that I'm not the problem but others are, doesn't qualify ANYWHERE as trolling.

Especially if it's true. Which it is.

Also love how you're saying "the entire world". No. Not the entire world. Just you handful of people.
simply because you act stupidly, doesn't mean the rest of the world is, too.

Besides, if you read my post again (which you obviously didn't do), you'll see that it's entirely about explaining to you how arguments determine who has the high ground in a discussion, and not some kind of "rant" about "how everyone else is the problem".

It's quite amusing how, in addtion to the utter ridiculousness of having to explain basic things things like this to an adult person, you aren't capable of getting it even THEN, because the entire post was wasted on a mind firmly prepared to disregard everything in it, while replacing the content with its own insipid nonsense.

"Again, anyone could be right or wrong, it's how they back up their claims that determines it. You simply didn't do that, which is why..."
"Ah, he's just rantin about some stupid shit, LOL"

Mhm.


You know what I love? Even now, standing on top of a thunderous mountain while proclaiming your glorious triumph of deceiving me about your gender, your post is still... an unadulterated paragon of EPIC FAIL.

Proving all my "rants" about my "superiority" completely right, all over again. Sorry, don't have much of a choice when faced with bare-faced stupidity of this magnitude.

And I can dish out such bold claims, because I can actually back them up. Every single time.



Okay, NOW no more edits ;)