originaltrilogy.com
Star wars v.s Star trek
Star wars v.s Star trek :: 1 < 2 > 3
generalfrevious
This user is offline.
I am ready for the trials!Didn't Kurtz get fired midway through production of ESB and replaced by Howard Kazanjian (who also did ROTJ)? Maybe we should change the name of this website to originalduology.com if people hate ROTJ so much.
Anyways, onto the topic. Even though I prefer SW, and I can see the appeal of Star Trek. TOS and TNG seem to be very enjoyable shows that have a few great episodes in them. DS9 I heard has a strong cult following, and Voyager and Enterprise are shows to be avoided.
Sounding like a broken record since May 2006.
ChainsawAsh
This user is offline.
aka PancakesI don't hate ROTJ. It disappoints me, sure, as there are a great many missed opportunities in it, and it doesn't feel like a continuation of what was set up in ESB ... but I still enjoy it, and watch it often (if not as often as SW and ESB).
haljordan28
This user is offline.
KURTZ NEVER GOT FIRED MUCH LESS HALF WAY THRUGH EPISODE 5. HE LEFT AFTER EMPIRE. HE WANTED NOTHING TO DO WITH THE DIRECTIO LUCAS WAS TAKING THINGS. THE SAME WAY LAWERNCE KASDAN WANTED NOTHING TO DO WITH THE PREQUELS AFER LUCAS GAVE HIM AN OUTLINE OF IT.
EVERYONE HATED THE DIRECTION LUCAS TOOK THING...HAMIL, FORD, KURTZ, KASDAN....EVERYONE. AND WE ALL SEE WHY CAUSE WE ALL SEE THEW OUTCOME OF THE PREQUELS AKA JUNKQUELS
Bingowings
This user is offline.
Magister Pontifex MaximusIn an ideal world only PSYCHO DAYV would be allowed to post in caps at least he gives his post a second glance before sending them.
-
- Anál nathrach,
- orth’ bháis’s bethad,
- do chél dénmha
TML
This user is offline.
"He no nuts, he's crazy!"haljordan28 said:
KURTZ NEVER GOT FIRED MUCH LESS HALF WAY THRUGH EPISODE 5. HE LEFT AFTER EMPIRE. HE WANTED NOTHING TO DO WITH THE DIRECTIO LUCAS WAS TAKING THINGS. THE SAME WAY LAWERNCE KASDAN WANTED NOTHING TO DO WITH THE PREQUELS AFER LUCAS GAVE HIM AN OUTLINE OF IT.
EVERYONE HATED THE DIRECTION LUCAS TOOK THING...HAMIL, FORD, KURTZ, KASDAN....EVERYONE. AND WE ALL SEE WHY CAUSE WE ALL SEE THEW OUTCOME OF THE PREQUELS AKA JUNKQUELS
Alexrd
This user is offline.
haljordan28 said:
KURTZ NEVER GOT FIRED MUCH LESS HALF WAY THRUGH EPISODE 5. HE LEFT AFTER EMPIRE. HE WANTED NOTHING TO DO WITH THE DIRECTIO LUCAS WAS TAKING THINGS. THE SAME WAY LAWERNCE KASDAN WANTED NOTHING TO DO WITH THE PREQUELS AFER LUCAS GAVE HIM AN OUTLINE OF IT.
EVERYONE HATED THE DIRECTION LUCAS TOOK THING...HAMIL, FORD, KURTZ, KASDAN....EVERYONE. AND WE ALL SEE WHY CAUSE WE ALL SEE THEW OUTCOME OF THE PREQUELS AKA JUNKQUELS
haljordan28
This user is offline.
Alexrd said:
haljordan28 said:
KURTZ NEVER GOT FIRED MUCH LESS HALF WAY THRUGH EPISODE 5. HE LEFT AFTER EMPIRE. HE WANTED NOTHING TO DO WITH THE DIRECTIO LUCAS WAS TAKING THINGS. THE SAME WAY LAWERNCE KASDAN WANTED NOTHING TO DO WITH THE PREQUELS AFER LUCAS GAVE HIM AN OUTLINE OF IT.
EVERYONE HATED THE DIRECTION LUCAS TOOK THING...HAMIL, FORD, KURTZ, KASDAN....EVERYONE. AND WE ALL SEE WHY CAUSE WE ALL SEE THEW OUTCOME OF THE PREQUELS AKA JUNKQUELS
just another prequel fan in denial . sorry if the truth hurts prequel lover. but YES. everything I just posted is fact not my opinion
TML
This user is offline.
"He no nuts, he's crazy!"haljordan28 said:
Alexrd said:
haljordan28 said:
KURTZ NEVER GOT FIRED MUCH LESS HALF WAY THRUGH EPISODE 5. HE LEFT AFTER EMPIRE. HE WANTED NOTHING TO DO WITH THE DIRECTIO LUCAS WAS TAKING THINGS. THE SAME WAY LAWERNCE KASDAN WANTED NOTHING TO DO WITH THE PREQUELS AFER LUCAS GAVE HIM AN OUTLINE OF IT.
EVERYONE HATED THE DIRECTION LUCAS TOOK THING...HAMIL, FORD, KURTZ, KASDAN....EVERYONE. AND WE ALL SEE WHY CAUSE WE ALL SEE THEW OUTCOME OF THE PREQUELS AKA JUNKQUELS
just another prequel fan in denial . sorry if the truth hurts prequel lover. but YES. everything I just posted is fact not my opinion
I'll be honest, I don't care for the prequels. But can't everyone have their own opinions? And him posting a link to "Whambulance" isn't saying how he's a fan of the prequels, he's just tired of hearing your complaining about then...
ChainsawAsh
This user is offline.
aka Pancakeshaljordan28 said:
just another prequel fan in denial . sorry if the truth hurts prequel lover. but YES. everything I just posted is fact not my opinion
Wow. You're kind of a dick, huh?
Bingowings
This user is offline.
Magister Pontifex MaximusChainsawAsh said:
haljordan28 said:
just another prequel fan in denial . sorry if the truth hurts prequel lover. but YES. everything I just posted is fact not my opinion
Wow. You're kind of a dick, huh?
-
- Anál nathrach,
- orth’ bháis’s bethad,
- do chél dénmha
Leonardo
This user is offline.
Joliet Jake*Muttley snicker*
... And they had 'The Empire Strikes Back', the fifth of the four Star Wars films. He is fucking with us numerically, isn't he! "Children, count up to ten." "Four, five, six, one, two, three, ten". No, it goes, four, five, six, one, two, three… No, it goes: four, five, six. One... Two and three have not been made." "Two and three have not been made! What should they be?" "What should they be? We do not know. All we know is that there will be a big floppy character in it that goes, squawk squawk squawk... who needs a punch up the bracket!"
haljordan28
This user is offline.
ChainsawAsh said:
haljordan28 said:
just another prequel fan in denial . sorry if the truth hurts prequel lover. but YES. everything I just posted is fact not my opinion
Wow. You're kind of a dick, huh?
no, I just get sick and tired of prequel lovers doing anything and everything they can which includes bringing down the OT films and telling lies and defending lies told by lucas just to try and not make their beloved prequels (JUNKQUELS) not look like the pieces of shit that they are
ChainsawAsh
This user is offline.
aka PancakesI challenge you to find one person that could be described as a "prequel lover" on this site. Hell, we have a whole section of the forum dedicated to people who are re-writing the prequels from scratch, as if the official versions never existed. Not to mention all the fan edits of the existing versions.
Akwat Kbrana
This user is offline.
Token Linguistics NerdAlso, it bears mentioning that "junkquels" is not a very clever moniker. If you're going for satire, you'd be better off with something that either rhymes with prequels (like "freakquels") or something that is otherwise etymologically related to prequels (and I can't really think of an example for that one).
But really, either way, nothing will make that particular approach clever or admirable. It's about as silly and sophomoric as referring to George Lucas as "George Luca$" or using the oft-repeated "M$ Windows". It's just not clever. Or humorous. It's juvenile and it makes people less likely to take you seriously. So why bother taking the time to type the extra letters when you could focus that energy and time on improving your overall spelling and grammar?
"Today I am pledging to cut the deficit we inherited in half by the end of my first term in office." -President Obama
TV's Frink
This user is offline.
Ointment FlyChainsawAsh said:
haljordan28 said:
just another prequel fan in denial . sorry if the truth hurts prequel lover. but YES. everything I just posted is fact not my opinion
Wow. You're kind of a dick, huh?
That's like saying the Leaning Tower of Pisa kind of leans.
Bingowings
This user is offline.
Magister Pontifex MaximusWee-Weequals or Pee-Peequals, Pooquals, Preschoolquals, Padmequals, Thickyprethickyqualthickies...etc
-
- Anál nathrach,
- orth’ bháis’s bethad,
- do chél dénmha
TheBoost
This user is offline.
Better a bad bomb than a bombadhaljordan28 said:
Alexrd said:
haljordan28 said:
EVERYONE HATED THE DIRECTION LUCAS TOOK THING...HAMIL, FORD, KURTZ, KASDAN....EVERYONE. AND WE ALL SEE WHY CAUSE WE ALL SEE THEW OUTCOME OF THE PREQUELS AKA JUNKQUELS
just another prequel fan in denial . sorry if the truth hurts prequel lover. but YES. everything I just posted is fact not my opinion
Between "Junkquels" and using "prequel lover" as a prejorative, I have to ask:
How old are you?
TML
This user is offline.
"He no nuts, he's crazy!"TheBoost said:
haljordan28 said:
Alexrd said:
haljordan28 said:
EVERYONE HATED THE DIRECTION LUCAS TOOK THING...HAMIL, FORD, KURTZ, KASDAN....EVERYONE. AND WE ALL SEE WHY CAUSE WE ALL SEE THEW OUTCOME OF THE PREQUELS AKA JUNKQUELS
just another prequel fan in denial . sorry if the truth hurts prequel lover. but YES. everything I just posted is fact not my opinion
Between "Junkquels" and using "prequel lover" as a prejorative, I have to ask:
How old are you?
GUY YOUR JST A PREQUEL LOVE R! DON'T TY TO MADE A ARGUEMENT WITH ME, CAUSE YOR JUST A PREQUEL LOVER!
captainsolo
This user is offline.
Tauntaun herder-Damn Fool Idealistic CrusaderI've never even seen anything Star Trek save for some snippets from the original series.
VADER!? WHERE THE HELL IS MY MOCHA LATTE? -Palpy on a very bad day.
"George didn't think there was any future in dead Han toys."-Harrison Ford
My review blog: thehificelluloidmonster.wordpress.com
haljordan28
This user is offline.
I am 36 and captsolo you need to watch star trek two the wrath of khan. next o the empire strkes back its the best sci fi film ever made. great acting,. great screenplay great philosophy and drama. the way empire is hearlded as the best star wars khan is spoken of the same way in star trek circles. it stands out miles above the rest. its almost not even a star trek film its so good.
Akwat Kbrana
This user is offline.
Token Linguistics Nerdhaljordan28 said:
I am 36 and captsolo you need to watch star trek two the wrath of khan. next o the empire strkes back its the best sci fi film ever made. great acting,. great screenplay great philosophy and drama. the way empire is hearlded as the best star wars khan is spoken of the same way in star trek circles. it stands out miles above the rest. its almost not even a star trek film its so good.
Umm...the [second-] best sci fi film ever made? Are you serious??
"Today I am pledging to cut the deficit we inherited in half by the end of my first term in office." -President Obama
ChainsawAsh
This user is offline.
aka PancakesI wouldn't consider Empire OR Khan to be in the top five best sci-fi films ever made, let alone the top two. What about 2001? Or Blade Runner? Children of Men? Moon? Planet of the Apes? The Day the Earth Stood Still? Invasion of the Body Snatchers? Abre los ojos? Alien? The Road?
I could go on, but I'll stop. My point is, every one of those films is (in my mind) superior to both Empire and Wrath of Khan, at least as science fiction.
TV's Frink
This user is offline.
Ointment Fly
Bingowings
This user is offline.
Magister Pontifex MaximusStar Wars isn't in any way Science Fiction it's Space Opera or Space Fantasy (Sinbad with laser swords).
Star Trek is almost Science Fiction but Wrath Of Khan is less so, it's essentially a submarine war film with phasers.
The Slow Motion Picture is the closest you get to a Science Fiction Star Trek film, it also the most cinematic of all the Trek films (TWOK is really a TV movie with a cinema release).
I love TWOK I'm not dissing it for one second but other than a little nod to terraforming it's Sci-Fi stripes are not exactly earned.
-
- Anál nathrach,
- orth’ bháis’s bethad,
- do chél dénmha
Leguman
This user is offline.
I always prefered Star Shrek.
Star wars v.s Star trek