msycamore
This user is offline.
It's from the "Flunk" disc, one of the digital broadcast versions.
We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions.
Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com
Tobar
This user is offline.
Wait for me. I shall be merciful and quick.I still don't understand how they got Jabba's eye color wrong for the '04 release.
Now here's a question I've been wanting to ask, are we missing frames from the Han/Greedo scene? I remember way back there used to be a website that compared all the changes from the OUT with the then new '97 SE. For the Han/Greedo scene he pointed out how they messed up the compositing of Han's blaster bolt going through the table and was now going over it. But now when I watch that scene I don't see that shot anywhere at all!
Join Space Command and then help back Jack Houston and the Necronauts!
Baronlando
This user is offline.
Padawan LearnerI'm pretty sure at least the last frame of Han's closeup ("yes, I'll bet you have") is gone. Maybe because it was spliced to the new super-important shot that now comes after.
The 97 does look good there. It's so annoying that that version is just as good to go as any theatrical release from 97, like CON AIR, and yet it's too much work to do it plus 5 minutes worth of original shots.
captainsolo
This user is offline.
Tauntaun herder-Damn Fool Idealistic CrusaderExactly.
VADER!? WHERE THE HELL IS MY MOCHA LATTE? -Palpy on a very bad day.
"George didn't think there was any future in dead Han toys."-Harrison Ford
My review blog: thehificelluloidmonster.wordpress.com
Bingowings
This user is offline.
Magister Pontifex MaximusThey got almost everything wrong with Jabba with 2004 version (it's arguable that anything would have been better than the 1997 monstrosity).
The skin tone is almost a universal mustard, the lighting is way too dark, the skin texture (which didn't look too bad in the bright light of TPM scenes) is too hard (not the flabby toad of ROTJ).
His matte jaundiced eyes are just the topping on the cake.
I'm pretty sure they could have worked a better solution to the tail problem too if they tried harder.
I'm still not convinced by the scale either which was pretty good in TPM but somehow still looks a bit too small in the 2004 SE with these eyes.
Say goodbye, to all this and "hello" to Jason Issacs.
captainsolo
This user is offline.
Tauntaun herder-Damn Fool Idealistic CrusaderThey simply did the one thing no one wanted: they made it worse.
VADER!? WHERE THE HELL IS MY MOCHA LATTE? -Palpy on a very bad day.
"George didn't think there was any future in dead Han toys."-Harrison Ford
My review blog: thehificelluloidmonster.wordpress.com
Bingowings
This user is offline.
Magister Pontifex MaximusI think some people wanted it,(just as some people wanted the cocoon sequence in Alien) the main problem with the Jabba scene is it's really pointless with the current subtitles.
A creative writer would have written new lines for Jabba which still matched what Han replied but said something other than what the Greedo scene had already done better (well before cutting that scene's balls off at least).
It does bugger up the Falcon reveal but that's only an issue in a world without OUT being freely available and treated with at least the same respect as the SE.
In the world we live in where that is the only version most people are allowed to have it is a bit of limp introduction to the fastest hunk of junk in the galaxy.
It also continued the trend started with ROTJ of having the Fetts not bounty hunters but general minders which in my view weakens the mystique of the guy/s.
Say goodbye, to all this and "hello" to Jason Issacs.
zombie84
This user is offline.
Jedi KnightI don't believe the 2004 Jabba is the TPM Jabba. Thats bullshit. They look nothing alike. The TPM Jabba looked and was coloured like him, the 2004 Jabba is something completely different.
The Secret History of Star Wars -- now available on Amazon.com!
"When George went back and put new creatures into the original Star Wars, I find that disturbing. It’s a revision of history. That bothers me."
--James Cameron, Entertainment Weekly, April 2010
JediTray
This user is offline. This user has been banned.
Not trying to derail, but if someone can PM me some links to NTSC DVD's of the SE LD set and it's bonus material, please do so!
Tobar
This user is offline.
Wait for me. I shall be merciful and quick.Going back to the Han/Greedo scene. I was looking at the two on youtube and the gout is missing that shot but it's there for the SE. So did the SE add a shot (where they make Han dodge Greedo's blast) or is the gout missing something?
Join Space Command and then help back Jack Houston and the Necronauts!
TV's Frink
This user is offline.
Likes Lens Flairs???
Greedo never shot in the OOT. That should answer your question.
doubleofive
This user is offline.
Chief Architect of Cynical MoralityLooking frame-by-frame, Han fires at Greedo twice: the 04 shot as Greedo shoots and the 97 shot a couple of frames later (which is the one that hits since the 04 bolt disappears instantly). I lost my screenshots of that, but it was very enlightening to me on how they made it "better". msycamore, can you get shots of that?
Star Wars Revisited Wordpress / Google+ / Facebook / Twitter
Cinetropolis - My new movie blog home
Where to hear me online
msycamore
This user is offline.
Here is a subtle fx-correction made in the '04 DVD.
'77

In this shot when three Y-wings fly in a formation, one of the Y-wings suddenly disappear before going out of frame, this was finally corrected in the '04 DVD.
'04

I think all the wipes in the film was also redone, am I right? I'm not entirely sure if Luke's lightsaber was recomposited or not, it sure looks like it in some shots. I know they redid the training remote though. Have I missed any change? Maybe someone can fill in the rest if there is any.
We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions.
Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com
msycamore
This user is offline.
Also, I must clarify so there isn't any misunderstanding, most of the SE caps I posted is from the '04DVD even though I wrote '97 on them. I wrote it that way, cause it will reflect what year the changes was done, not the year of the transfer. But I'm sure you already got that. ;)
We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions.
Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com
zombie84
This user is offline.
Jedi KnightYeah, I saw that too.
Sooo, I'm basically calling the website open for business. All of the major pieces are there, and I think the formatting and text has been cleaned up so that it looks basically complete. Tell your friends. :p
Two pages are listed as coming soon: a screen materials page, and a media contact page. The first is being worked on now, plus another editorial on why the GOUT sucks, which will be the last editorial until new news breaks, but the second I am bit stumped on. Any contacts and suggestions here would be appreciated.
The other thing I would like to do is add a newsletter subscription, to just send a text email when there is a major site update or any relevant news. There are tutorials out there, but .CGI-bin stuff is a bit over my head. Does anyone here know how to do this stuff so thats its simple enough for a bonehead like me to use it?
The Secret History of Star Wars -- now available on Amazon.com!
"When George went back and put new creatures into the original Star Wars, I find that disturbing. It’s a revision of history. That bothers me."
--James Cameron, Entertainment Weekly, April 2010
doubleofive
This user is offline.
Chief Architect of Cynical MoralityI definately think with the loss of the official change list we should recreate it and complete it. Maybe not for savestarwars, but I don't want to let msycamore's work go unnoticed. Just saying.
Star Wars Revisited Wordpress / Google+ / Facebook / Twitter
Cinetropolis - My new movie blog home
Where to hear me online
zombie84
This user is offline.
Jedi KnightI plan on including it on my page of SE changes. I have links to your page only temporarily, because re-doing everything from scratch is a huge undertaking and this is fine until I get around to that.
The Secret History of Star Wars -- now available on Amazon.com!
"When George went back and put new creatures into the original Star Wars, I find that disturbing. It’s a revision of history. That bothers me."
--James Cameron, Entertainment Weekly, April 2010
doubleofive
This user is offline.
Chief Architect of Cynical MoralityAwesome. Wish I had the resources to help out with the comps, as you know, it's kind of my thing. ;-)
Star Wars Revisited Wordpress / Google+ / Facebook / Twitter
Cinetropolis - My new movie blog home
Where to hear me online
Tobar
This user is offline.
Wait for me. I shall be merciful and quick.Now here's what I'm talking about with the missing shot:
So let's start off with the '04 SE, here we have Han saying I'll bet you have:

Then it quickly fades to this shot of the two of them:

But back in the GOUT right after Han says his line suddenly there's a bright flash:

Then it cuts to the Dummy Greedo right before he explodes:

So did the SE add a shot or was the GOUT censored? I personally would lean toward them censoring this shot because of that site I mentioned before that noted Han's bolt going over the table instead of through it. Thoughts?
Join Space Command and then help back Jack Houston and the Necronauts!
msycamore
This user is offline.
Tobar said:
So did the SE add a shot or was the GOUT censored? I personally would lean toward them censoring this shot because of that site I mentioned before that noted Han's bolt going over the table instead of through it. Thoughts?
The GOUT is not censored, the original scene have always been just like that, the SE just replaced the dummy with that wide shot of them as seen in your caps. I think the SE also trimmed a few frames from the original before or after I don't remember.
We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions.
Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com
doubleofive
This user is offline.
Chief Architect of Cynical MoralityThat dummy Greedo cracks me up!
Star Wars Revisited Wordpress / Google+ / Facebook / Twitter
Cinetropolis - My new movie blog home
Where to hear me online
msycamore
This user is offline.
doubleofive said:
Looking frame-by-frame, Han fires at Greedo twice: the 04 shot as Greedo shoots and the 97 shot a couple of frames later (which is the one that hits since the 04 bolt disappears instantly). I lost my screenshots of that, but it was very enlightening to me on how they made it "better". msycamore, can you get shots of that?
I don't know, I think a description of it serve it better in this scene than comparison pictures between '97SE and the '04DVD as it's most the timing that is different between them, and the lack of the "Yes..." in Solo's line. But I can try to capture the difference if you really want me to.
We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions.
Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com
doubleofive
This user is offline.
Chief Architect of Cynical MoralityNo, it's fine, I just thought it was fun to point out the disappearing/reappearing blaster bolt.
Star Wars Revisited Wordpress / Google+ / Facebook / Twitter
Cinetropolis - My new movie blog home
Where to hear me online
Mielr
This user is offline.
Litter-Box Engineer
Tobar said:
Going back to the Han/Greedo scene. I was looking at the two on youtube and the gout is missing that shot but it's there for the SE. So did the SE add a shot (where they make Han dodge Greedo's blast) or is the gout missing something?
![]()
R.I.P. "Creamy" 2002(?) - 08/01/2010
Tobar
This user is offline.
Wait for me. I shall be merciful and quick.If it's sourced from the GOUT then how can you know? The whole question was whether the GOUT itself was missing something.
Join Space Command and then help back Jack Houston and the Necronauts!