Save Star Wars Dot Com :: 1 < 7 > 41

  • Reply
  • Print
Moth3r's avatar
RE: Save Star Wars Dot Com

'twas a good one. Thought it would be someone's sig by now.

Guidelines for post content and general behaviour: read announcement here

Max. allowable image sizes in signatures: reminder here 

Darth Id's avatar
RE: Save Star Wars Dot Com

The OOT will be released in 2017, not 2014.  (40th Anniversary.)

SEs are the new New Coke.  Remember how they "retired" "CocaCola Classic" too?

Arbitrary scarcity --> outcry --> increased demand for something that had been previously taken for granted.

Fang Zei's avatar
RE: Save Star Wars Dot Com

Anyone got confirmation of what exactly was projected at the State Theater yesterday?

msycamore's avatar
RE: Save Star Wars Dot Com

zombie84 said:

While I was vacationing I did find the time to write a desperately needed editorial though:

http://savestarwars.com/righttoculturalheritage.html

Very interesting and well written article.

Another form of alteration to the film medium that somehow lately have gained a sort of acceptance, is that the films original audio mixes (that is as much a part of the film as the picture imo.) is rarely available on new home video releases, if they are included, it's often available in compressed form when the new remix gets a fine lossless treatment. They should at least, always be included.

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Baronlando's avatar
RE: Save Star Wars Dot Com

It was 97. He was talking about an eventual dvd of that "definitive" 1997 version! (they actually call it that in the 97 extras. 4 years after the "definitive" laserdisc box!)

skyjedi2005's avatar
RE: Save Star Wars Dot Com

How can we save the oot trilogy when its own creator wants it buried and set out to destroy it with badly conceived prequels with videogame and cartoon cgi, and badly reedited butchered versions of the only real star wars trilogy.

 "Always loved Vader's wordless self sacrifice. Another shitty, clueless, revision like Greedo and young Anakin's ghost. What a fucking shame." -Simon Pegg.

Baronlando's avatar
RE: Save Star Wars Dot Com

Harmy said:

Well, that sounds really weird to me as 1997 was the year DVD first appeared and very few people heard about it and he didn't release the films on it for another 7 years.

Dvd wasn't some obscure mystery in 97, it was a new thing but it was in mainstream stores everywhere and had been on the boards a long time. He participated in the Graffiti dvd less than a year later. He only waited 7 years because he's a pain in the ass that way.

Bingowings' avatar
RE: Save Star Wars Dot Com

To be honest it must have taken seven years to figure out how to screw up a major DVD release so conclusively.

Do you think screwed up sound, blue snow and pretty peach lipstick Vadersabers come from nowhere?

Say goodbye, to all this and "hello" to Jason Issacs.

captainsolo's avatar
RE: Save Star Wars Dot Com

All he has to do is just license the original films out to someone else (CRITERION!!!) since he wants nothing to with them. Everybody else can, why can't Lucasfilm? Two reasons: 1. Loss of revenue. 2.It would then look like that they had caved in to demand.

VADER!? WHERE THE HELL IS MY MOCHA LATTE? -Palpy on a very bad day.

"George didn't think there was any future in dead Han toys."-Harrison Ford

My review blog: thehificelluloidmonster.wordpress.com

Anchorhead's avatar
RE: Save Star Wars Dot Com

Just throwing another aesthetic idea out there.  You have a lot of information on the home page.  That's great, because there is a lot of important information that needs to be addressed up-front.

I think an outsider or uniformed guest might find it easier to read and maybe a little less Star Wars geeky if the copy wasn't so stylized. I'd left-justify the headings, change the font to Times, and leave the body ragged right. Giant blocks of justified copy without breaks can be a little cumbersome to read, particularly on a computer screen.  I  also added color to the copy to give it a little more depth, tying it in with your page header.

Just a thought.

 

 Banana me eat banana.

Sluggo's avatar
RE: Save Star Wars Dot Com

Oh yeah.  I forgot about Prillaman.  I wonder if he is still hosting my old Holiday Special DVD covers?

When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish memes.

Check out my reconstruction of the ROTJ Shooting Script

msycamore's avatar
RE: Save Star Wars Dot Com

Ok, here is some of the Visual Changes done to SW that was not included on the official list. Many are subtle but they are changes nevertheless. I'm sure I missed a few...

'77

'97 same font but thinner with wider spacing.

'04

'77

'81 different starfield

'77

'81 Aside from the different starfield and the new crawl, no thick matte line around the Stardestroyer.

'97 the original '77 starfield is back, the SW logo also recedes much faster into space than in the two earlier opening crawls.

'77

'97  digitally recomposited? or just cleaned up mattelines on the Blockade Runner.

'77

'97 recomp? motion blur on the pod & cleaned up matte lines on pod & ship.

'77

'97 I believe that all hologram shots in the film were recomposited in '97, they also removed the horizontal bars that was present on all original holograms...

'77

'97 ...and they forgot or didn't bother to reinsert the cone of light from R2 in two brief shots, the other is on the official list but it didn't include this one in Ben's hut.

'77

'04 CG clouds inserted to match the close-up of the suns.

'77

'97

'77

'97

I didn't bother to post the '97 digital landspeeder & Jabba the Hutt, I can post them if you need them.

Also this info is wrong:

The '97 version of this shot is exactly the same as the original besides the colortiming, it was in '04 they removed the landscape.

Last edited on September 2, 2010 at 3:55 AM by msycamore

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

doubleofive's avatar
RE: Save Star Wars Dot Com

Keep going! I've not seen 97 Jabba since 2003 or so. There's seems to be a lot more, some of them new mistakes. Sad really.

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress / Google+ / Facebook / Twitter

Cinetropolis - My new movie blog home

Where to hear me online

skyjedi2005's avatar
RE: Save Star Wars Dot Com

To me the 77 version looks the best in every single shot.

Why mess with perfection.

That is the version of the film i want.  Too bad we will never see it on the big screen ever again.

Last edited on September 2, 2010 at 1:40 AM by skyjedi2005

 "Always loved Vader's wordless self sacrifice. Another shitty, clueless, revision like Greedo and young Anakin's ghost. What a fucking shame." -Simon Pegg.

msycamore's avatar
RE: Save Star Wars Dot Com

doubleofive said:

Keep going! I've not seen 97 Jabba since 2003 or so.

 Here you go:

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Members reading this topic: None