zeropc
This user is offline.
the movie has a soft spot in my movie heart. it's not the greatest movie ever made, but it has many things to like. besides, the cast is full of a who-is-who. unfortunately warner bros. decided with the release of the extended cut on dvd, that the original theatrical version is no longer existent for home video. i had a little bit hopes that with the blu-ray release we get to choose which version we want to view. nope, we only got the extended cut.
for some time now i wanted to restore the theatrical cut, but i was lacking a high quality source for the audio. but now i'm able to do so, with the help of a few folks.
source to be used in this project
blu-ray
hd broadcast capture as the foundation of the theatrical cut - special thanks to jj666
ntsc laserdisc for the pcm audio - special thanks to bendermac
unless someone has a better source then the hd broadcast version i have, please let me know, i'm going to start this project.
Doctor M
This user is offline.
Jedi KnightSubscribed!
Yeah the only DVD of the theatrical cut is pretty ugly and I find the extended version to be a let down.
There is another thread here somewhere about a theatrical cut preservation though.
digitalfreaknyc
This user is offline.
Jedi KnightI'm definitely interested. Are you doing this losslessly with the Blu-ray as source?
zeropc
This user is offline.
the blu-ray is main video source. the theatrical cut scenes will be taken from the hd broadcast. if possible i try to keep the video untouched as much as possible. meaning no re-encode for the most part of the movie. only the re-inserted theatrical scenes would be encoded to vc-1 and then joined.
there are options to do this, which will be tested upfront. if i can't get it to work, the whole movie will be re-encoded to avc.
dvdmike
This user is offline.
I thought there was a thread for this, I got the HD TV and spent days re timing the film but only needed the audio.....
For one the TC scenes will not match the BD as the cclour will be miles off
http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Robin-Hood-Prince-of-Thieves-Theatrical-Cut/topic/15425/
Movin' in slow motion, it feels so good
Official Batfleck defence force
Doctor M
This user is offline.
Jedi KnightI wasn't aware there was an HDTV version of the Theatrical Cut. If so, what's wrong with it that it needs work? (And where can I find it?)
Edit: Never mind. Crap colors and no English audio would be plenty wrong.
_,,,^..^,,,_
This user is offline.
Laserdisc MasterI'm curious if this project is going on... and about HDTV properties (resolution, fps, codec, mbps) - is its video (apart color grading) equal or better than BD?
"IT!. . . COULD! . . . WORK!!" 
released: SW:ANH [OT) | SW:ANH ['97) | Jurassic Park | The Lost World: JP | The Thing |
zeropc
This user is offline.
the project is currently on hold, because of lack of disk space. too much other stuff going on. andrea, you know the problem ;)
i can post some screenshots later. here is the log of the hd-broadcast
Sequence Frame 244080(1000-B) / Time 2:23:07 :
Info: End of MPEG2 sequence
Sequence Summary:
File Size Processed: 13.72 GB, Play Time: 02h:23m:07s
1920 x 1080, 29.97 fps, 14.00 Mbps (12.96 Mbps Average).
Average Video Quality: 55.67 KB/Frame, 0.22 Bits/Pixel.
AC3 Audio: 2/0 Channels (L, R), 48.0 kHz, 384 kbps.
Dialog Normalization: -27.0 dB
0 of 244080 video frames found with errors.
0 of 268370 audio frames found with errors.
0 corrupted video bytes in file.
0.000000 seconds of video timestamp gaps.
0.000000 seconds of audio timestamp gaps.
End of Log
_,,,^..^,,,_
This user is offline.
Laserdisc MasterCould have been worst! At the end, what do you think about its video quality? I mean, it seems the BD has some EE, what about the HDTV?
I'm really starting to think to spoRvify this movie! (^^,)
"IT!. . . COULD! . . . WORK!!" 
released: SW:ANH [OT) | SW:ANH ['97) | Jurassic Park | The Lost World: JP | The Thing |
_,,,^..^,,,_
This user is offline.
Laserdisc MasterHere you are an interesting comparison between LD, DVD and BD... I should add the HDTV has the same color grading of DVD.
I don't like BD colors, and I prefer LD, but I don't dislike DVD (HDTV) color grading, because it's near to LD than BD; neverthless, I think applying LD colors over HDTV will be the best solutions.
Opinions?
*** *** ***
On audio side: the italian extended cut DVD and BD have a new dubbing... it's widely recognized that the original dubbing (of the theatrical cut) is better than this... another reason to do a preservation, from my POV.
"IT!. . . COULD! . . . WORK!!" 
released: SW:ANH [OT) | SW:ANH ['97) | Jurassic Park | The Lost World: JP | The Thing |
dvdmike
This user is offline.
It has that nasty pink 90s tinge all transfers had
Movin' in slow motion, it feels so good
Official Batfleck defence force
_,,,^..^,,,_
This user is offline.
Laserdisc Masterdvdmike said:
It has that nasty pink 90s tinge all transfers had
...but what version do you think is closest to theatrical color timing? And which do you prefer?
"IT!. . . COULD! . . . WORK!!" 
released: SW:ANH [OT) | SW:ANH ['97) | Jurassic Park | The Lost World: JP | The Thing |
dvdmike
This user is offline.
The BD is not far off for colour, but it was super dark theatrically think the new Last of the Mohicans BD so maybe the LD is closer.
I tried it here with mine:
HDTV

Mine

http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Robin-Hood-Prince-of-Thieves-Theatrical-Cut/post/636476/#TopicPost636476
Movin' in slow motion, it feels so good
Official Batfleck defence force
_,,,^..^,,,_
This user is offline.
Laserdisc MasterCould you explaind better what "mine" is? Is an attempt to use LD as color reference, and apply it to BD? And what process have you used?
Sorry for all these questions, but I'm curious...
"IT!. . . COULD! . . . WORK!!" 
released: SW:ANH [OT) | SW:ANH ['97) | Jurassic Park | The Lost World: JP | The Thing |
dvdmike
This user is offline.
I did it by hand no colour like just got rid of the pink and brought back the greens and the colour to the image.
I then knocked down the contrast and brightness to try and replicate the theatrical viewing experience that I and others (http://siskelandebert.org/video/8K1BRWM27OSB/Robin-Hood-Prince-of-Thieves-amp-Santa-Sangre-Holy-Blood) had
Movin' in slow motion, it feels so good
Official Batfleck defence force
_,,,^..^,,,_
This user is offline.
Laserdisc MasterI could agree that your manual correction is good enough, as the HDTV image here is a bit cold, and I agree about contrast and brightness levels; but it could not qualify as restoration, but only as fanedit... don't get me wrong, I admire your efforts here and in several other threads (like Robocop)... but it seems that a *proper* fan restoration (as proper could be a fan restoration, by the way...) should take a reference when trying to do a color correction.
I mean, maybe the laserdisc colors are not the same of what we all saw in the theaters, but at least it could be called *a* reference; do you agree? I'm curious myself to see if, using HDTV luma and LD chroma results will be similar to what you have done.
I was tempted myself to use a color grading for "The Matrix" not entirely based on DVD as reference, but I decided to stick with DVD as color reference; now the BD has colors really really close to DVD and, even if I personally prefer my previous settings in some instances, I think the whole color grading should be mantained as closely to the reference as possible (even if I know it's cleary impossible).
This is, of course, only my personal opinion - I'm still trying to find a clear definition of what a fan edit, restoration, preservation are, and nothing seems to be "written in the stone" (^^,) and you deserve the right to make your own color correction, but I strongly advice to NOT use your german HDTV capture...
The 1080i english HDTV is way better than the 720p german; take a look at these screenshots:
german 720p (yours, as you posted, untouched)

1080i english (VLC -> MSPaint -> resize 50% -> resize 73%, to match your picture)

the 1080i have more details, is less cropped, and colors are slightly different... it's AR is around 1.80:1, while the BD is 16:9 (1.77777...:1), so is closer to the theatrical AR of 1.85:1 (not so much, indeed...)
"IT!. . . COULD! . . . WORK!!" 
released: SW:ANH [OT) | SW:ANH ['97) | Jurassic Park | The Lost World: JP | The Thing |
dvdmike
This user is offline.
I am not sure what point you are making exactly, there may be more than one.
Mine was abandoned long ago due to lack of interest from those who requested it, and you are assuming using colour like from an LD qualifies as some sort of a restoration.
This assuming the LD is correct and letting a machine do the whole movie is the way to go, I personally think the colour space of LD makes that method moot personally.
I am not by posting pics saying mine was better you asked how I would do it and I showed you what I think the colours should be, that has nothing to do with the resolution of yhe file.
I am after that post staying away from the project
Movin' in slow motion, it feels so good
Official Batfleck defence force
_,,,^..^,,,_
This user is offline.
Laserdisc MasterSorry, I didn't want to offend you; I only pointed out that the laserdisc is *a* reference, and NOT *the* reference; I mean, as I wrote in my post, that is better (IMHO) to stick with a reference (even if not for sure the right one) instead of making a color correction "by eye", that's it. If it seemed I was rough, I apologize, it was not my intention, I repeat, I like your threads and I think you are a smart person, so sorry again.
About laserdisc as color reference, I agree with you, it's not the best source that could be used as reference for an HD project, but at least it's better than VHS, and a PAL 1.85 laserdisc still got around 416x160/200 pixel chroma resolution Vs 208x360 pixel chroma resolution of a PAL 1.85:1 letterbox DVD, so it has almost the same chroma resolution.
At the end, the whole discussion could be summed up in: it will be a wise choice to use the 1080ì HDTV as luma reference, and LD as chroma reference, to make a restoration project of the theatrical cut of Robin Hood, or it's better to use the BD, cut out the scenes not belonging to the theatical cut, and use the HDTV to restore the missing scenes not found on the extended cut BD? And, if the latter is the best choice, how to restore color grading in the HDTV to match the BD one?
"IT!. . . COULD! . . . WORK!!" 
released: SW:ANH [OT) | SW:ANH ['97) | Jurassic Park | The Lost World: JP | The Thing |
zeropc
This user is offline.
always remember: blu-ray is capable to hold a higher color spectrum then dvd or ld was able to do. so using a ld or even a dvd for reference might result in a wrong color display altogether.
i also not recommend to do color correction purely by eye, unless you
- have approved monitors for color correction, which are also properly calibrated
- have high knowledge of color correction using scopes
- know what the original intended look of the movie was
point 3 will be very had to fill, since none of has ever spoken to the directors to the extend a colorist would've or has access to the notes done during the color correction process.
the final results may look good, but also may not represent what was originally intended. a good example were i have mixed feelings about the result is andrea's the thing color correction. while it looks pretty good, i don't think it's the right look. john carpenter usually goes to a more natural look of colors. especially the skin tones in andrea's the thing look way to desaturated. which i think is a result of using a laserdisc color. we wont know for sure, unless mr. carpenter would watch that version and tells us if it's right or totally wrong.
_,,,^..^,,,_
This user is offline.
Laserdisc Masterzeropc said:
always remember: blu-ray is capable to hold a higher color spectrum then dvd or ld was able to do. so using a ld or even a dvd for reference might result in a wrong color display altogether.
The BD uses 8 bit for each color, and rec.709 as color space; chroma ranges from 16 to 240, hence we have 225 possible values for each RGB; total colors that could be displayed are 225x225x225= 11.390.625; DVD uses rec.601 with different coefficients, but the total colors remains the same; LD uses bt.601, but as analog format has not a finished amount of color that could be displayed, so theoretically LD has infinite number of colors; all these colorspaces cover about 35% of the CIE gamut.
So, could you explain better your assertion?
i also not recommend to do color correction purely by eye, unless you
- have approved monitors for color correction, which are also properly calibrated
- have high knowledge of color correction using scopes
- know what the original intended look of the movie was
point 3 will be very had to fill, since none of has ever spoken to the directors to the extend a colorist would've or has access to the notes done during the color correction process.
Totally agree.
the final results may look good, but also may not represent what was originally intended. a good example were i have mixed feelings about the result is andrea's the thing color correction. while it looks pretty good, i don't think it's the right look. john carpenter usually goes to a more natural look of colors. especially the skin tones in andrea's the thing look way to desaturated. which i think is a result of using a laserdisc color. we wont know for sure, unless mr. carpenter would watch that version and tells us if it's right or totally wrong.
My attempt is just a compromise; and I agree that sometimes the skin tones are too desaturated; the fact that saturation is quite low could be due to different factors:
Still, I like most white snow and black and white husky dog... (^^,)
Only John Carpenter will tell us which version he thinks is right, but probably we'll never know...
"IT!. . . COULD! . . . WORK!!" 
released: SW:ANH [OT) | SW:ANH ['97) | Jurassic Park | The Lost World: JP | The Thing |