PT vs OT Scientific Study :: 1 > 7

  • Reply
  • Print
TheBoost's avatar
PT vs OT Scientific Study

I'm a high school science teacher and I've got a nasty cough.

First period I say after a particuarly long series of dry hacks, "Sorry I sound like General Greivous."

Nothing. No reaction. Blank stares.

Curious, the next period I said, "Sorry I sound like Darth Vader." and got a couple small chuckles.

I alternated the rest of the day. Here are the results.

  • Greivous: 3 periods of total silence.
  • Vader: Small chuckles, scoff of recognition and twice being told "Darth Vader doesnt' cough."

 

My students are 14-15 years old of a wide range of ethnicities from the lower to upper-middle classes. It's not exactly a scientific study, but it gives me some hope for the future.

Alexrd's avatar
RE: PT vs OT Scientific Study

I don't know. It's not like Grievous was such a remarkable character.

Sluggo's avatar
RE: PT vs OT Scientific Study

That would have been better if you would have told it as a story problem.

When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish memes.

Check out my reconstruction of the ROTJ Shooting Script

xhonzi's avatar
RE: PT vs OT Scientific Study

Train A is leaving station B at a rate of 100% sounding like General Grievious...

IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!

"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005

"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM

"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.

Rewrite the Prequels!

 

Sluggo's avatar
RE: PT vs OT Scientific Study

See?  That's what I'm talking about. 

When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish memes.

Check out my reconstruction of the ROTJ Shooting Script

Ziggy Stardust's avatar
RE: PT vs OT Scientific Study

Let us not forget, Darth was in the prequels.

Last edited on March 1, 2011 at 3:10 AM by Ziggy Stardust (Reason: FIXED ERROR. )

quadrennia.tumblr.com

CP3S said:


pittrek said:
I seriously hope I will live enough to see the original Star Wars trilogy in this quality
You will not. None of us will, except for a very old and dying Ziggy Stardust who will watch it through teary eyes as he remembers us all.  
TV's Frink's avatar
RE: PT vs OT Scientific Study

Ziggy Stardust said:

Lets us not forget, Darth was in a prequel.

Fixed.

Also...noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo....

ray_afraid's avatar
RE: PT vs OT Scientific Study

TV's Frink said:

Ziggy Stardust said:

Let us not forget, Darth was in a prequel.

Fixed.

Also...noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo....

Fixed again.

Also...Where's...  Pa-duh-may?

Cool story Boost! Good to know OT is still more recognized than PT!

Last edited on March 1, 2011 at 2:53 AM by ray_afraid
Ziggy Stardust's avatar
RE: PT vs OT Scientific Study

Six years later, and nobody remembers General Grievous.

 

HA!

quadrennia.tumblr.com

CP3S said:


pittrek said:
I seriously hope I will live enough to see the original Star Wars trilogy in this quality
You will not. None of us will, except for a very old and dying Ziggy Stardust who will watch it through teary eyes as he remembers us all.  
greenpenguino's avatar
RE: PT vs OT Scientific Study

General who?? ;)

STAR WARS EPISODE 2.8 - known as Greenpenguino's best Star wars sequel script, EVA!!!! SEQUEL SEQUEL!

I'm the forums younger clone of TVs' Frink. Except sillier and more handsomer...

Ziggy Stardust's avatar
RE: PT vs OT Scientific Study

Exactly.

quadrennia.tumblr.com

CP3S said:


pittrek said:
I seriously hope I will live enough to see the original Star Wars trilogy in this quality
You will not. None of us will, except for a very old and dying Ziggy Stardust who will watch it through teary eyes as he remembers us all.  
Quackula's avatar
RE: PT vs OT Scientific Study

Grevious didn't look cool and acted and sounded like a complete buffoon. He didn't do a single thing in his only movie to make him seem threatening or impressive.

Shit, at least Darth Maul offed a Jedi.

xhonzi's avatar
RE: PT vs OT Scientific Study

ray_afraid said:

TV's Frink said:

Ziggy Stardust said:

Let's all forget... PLEASE, let's all forget... Darth was in a prequel.

Fixed.

Also...noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo....

Fixed again.

colars fidx

IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!

"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005

"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM

"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.

Rewrite the Prequels!

 

WhatsMyName's avatar
RE: PT vs OT Scientific Study

Quackula said:

Grevious didn't look cool and acted and sounded like a complete buffoon. He didn't do a single thing in his only movie to make him seem threatening or impressive.

Shit, at least Darth Maul offed a Jedi.

 First of all, Darth Maul was the greatest Sith out of all the movies.

Second, according to GL, each movie he wanted to bring in one new nasty character. ESB: Bobba Fett, ROTJ: Jabba/Emperor, TPM: Darth Maul AOTC:Jango Fett/Count Dooku, ROTS: General Grevious

So, that's the general analogy.

 

Sluggo's avatar
RE: PT vs OT Scientific Study

General Analogy sounds more threatening than General Grevious.

When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish memes.

Check out my reconstruction of the ROTJ Shooting Script

haljordan28's avatar
RE: PT vs OT Scientific Study

As the kids who grew up with the PT films grow into young adults/adults  their love  and preference for the PT films over the OT film will change and they will start leaning towards the OT films.   The luster of special effects  and CGI will wear off as they become older and  most will appreciate a real story and screenplay over  the circus performing B-movie screenplays of the PT films.

I still feel insulted when PT fans my age  still claim  we only prefer the OT films because that is what we grew up with  and we have fond memories of them.

 

I grew up with and have fond memories of the made for TV spider-man films but that does not mean I think they are better films than the  Sam Rami films. NO...PT fans  there is really such a thing  as  liking something better  simply because it is better in  every way  a film should be.

 

Also I love how natalie portman at the oscars the other night gave thanks to like three different directors she has worked for and teaching her things and inspiring her through out her career  and she failed to mention george lucas  even though he directed her in 3 films.

Last edited on March 1, 2011 at 8:15 AM by haljordan28
Anchorhead's avatar
RE: PT vs OT Scientific Study

Sluggo said:

General Analogy sounds more threatening than General Grevious.

 

*Note

I don't know who General Grievous is, but I've heard a lot of the character names from the  last two films and they sound just as stupid as the names in Phantom.

Come on man,  from Skywalker, Kenobi, and Solo..... to Naboo, Dooku, Jar Jar,  and Bibble?

Maul & Grievous - that's just lazy.

Crimson. Eleven. Delight. Petrichor.

LexX's avatar
RE: PT vs OT Scientific Study

TheBoost said:

First period I say after a particuarly long series of dry hacks, "Sorry I sound like General Greivous."

Nothing. No reaction. Blank stares.

That would probably be my expression, too, plus shame which you wouldn't be able to see. LOL

And in the time of greatest despair, there shall come a savior, and he shall be known as the Son of the Suns.

EyeShotFirst's avatar
RE: PT vs OT Scientific Study

I think kids look at the prequels the way I looked at Power Rangers:

I remembered watching years ago, but can't remember what the hell it was about.

Where as the OT has fans that have watched it over and over since 77.

"The other versions will disappear. Even the 35 million tapes of Star Wars out there won't last more than 30 or 40 years. A hundred years from now, the only version of the movie that anyone will remember will be the DVD version [of the Special Edition], and you'll be able to project it on a 20' by 40' screen with perfect quality. I think it's the director's prerogative, not the studio's to go back and reinvent a movie." - George Lucas

reply | reply with quote | bookmark | report

Quackula's avatar
RE: PT vs OT Scientific Study

Thing is, I don't think Power Rangers ever attempted to be much more than what it was, while the PT is filled will all sorts of attempts at being 'intellectual'.

 

TML's avatar
RE: PT vs OT Scientific Study

WhatsMyName said:

 First of all, Darth Maul was the greatest Sith out of all the movies.

 

Yeah! Don't you love when he, umm.... What did he do again?

timdiggerm's avatar
RE: PT vs OT Scientific Study

TML said:

WhatsMyName said:

 First of all, Darth Maul was the greatest Sith out of all the movies.

 

Yeah! Don't you love when he, umm.... What did he do again?

He did do some fancy flips and stuff. That was kinda cool.

Monolithium's avatar
RE: PT vs OT Scientific Study

TML said:

WhatsMyName said:

 First of all, Darth Maul was the greatest Sith out of all the movies.

 

Yeah! Don't you love when he, umm.... What did he do again?

The supposed badassery of Darth Maul has troubled me since the beginning.  Sure he looked cool.  But his death negates whatever goodwill he had accumulated by that point.

Unless Lucas wanted it to seem like Maul wanted to die, there is no way that he could not have blocked that swing.

Since they're like poetry, what with the rhyming and all, I find that I only need to watch three out of the six films.

zombie84's avatar
RE: PT vs OT Scientific Study

Eh, could say the same thing about Boba Fett. Doesn't really do anything. Only in like four scenes. Has a stupid death. A few minutes of posing goes a long way.

The Secret History of Star Wars -- now available on Amazon.com!

"When George went back and put new creatures into the original Star Wars, I find that disturbing. It’s a revision of history. That bothers me."

--James Cameron, Entertainment Weekly, April 2010

Members reading this topic: None