Laserschwert
This user is offline.
I am ready for the trials!Moth3r
This user is offline.
Muttley, do something!Laserschwert
This user is offline.
I am ready for the trials!CrumbY
This user is offline.
Hello Moth3r,
I was wondering if finaly you get your hands on a CLD-2950 to compare it to the picture of the 925. It seems no one has the same opinion on the question.
And maybe if you got some information from Laserman (about a mod to output a raw signal) before his disappearance.
I have for NTSC a CLD-R7G and for PAL a plain S310 ;) and if the output of the R7G is of course very clean, i admit the Pal resolution is REALLY a plus.
Thank you
Moth3r
This user is offline.
Muttley, do something!I never got a 2950, but I did manage to pick up an old analogue-only player (LD-V4100 if I remember). One day I'll get some image comparisons up.
I've got details for the RGB mod for the D925 somewhere, but no-one ever worked out how to get a raw composite video output.
CrumbY
This user is offline.
OK. I am trying to get a 2950 myself.
I have heard good things about the LD-V4300D (some say it has a raw output and better signal than the 2950/925 however i think it's pretty old).
I have got the Service Manual of the 2950 and i think that for an electronic expert (with all the detailed diagram there is in it) its maybe easy to get the raw signal from a LD-Player
Orinoco_Womble
This user is offline.
smurrrrheeeeI've not had an opportunity to test the 2950 myself, but I do have a few PAL players that might be of interest. I don't have a decent capture card to test them definitively, but from what I can tell by doing a side by side comparison, here's how they stack up to each other:
D925 - sharpest picture of the PAL players that I've seen. Very 'digital' looking picture and lacking in detail. When you compare side by side to the other 2 players. The picture looks like DVNR was applied to the D925 to give it a lower noise floor which smooths over a lot of the fine detail. Consequently the detail level does not look to be as high as the other two players.
V4300D - industrial player - more detailed than the D925, although quite noisy and very soft picture. The picture looks very analogue and 'natural' compared to the D925 which looks very 'digitised' when seen side by side. The detail level is great, but the amount of noise and soft picture might be a problem.
CLD-1050 - analogue PAL only player - again, a very analogue and extremely 'natural' looking picture. Easily looks better than the V4300D and more detailed than the D925. Less noise than the V4300D and slightly sharper picture with better colours. The most natural looking picture of the 3 players. More detailed picture than the other 2, although still softer picture than the D925.
The verdict: the D925 has less noise and a sharper picture, but the V4300D and 1050 seem to have more detail and a more natural looking picture over all. The 1050 in particular has the most natural and pleasing picture of the 3, although it is lacking in sharpness. It would be interesting to see how the 2950 stacks up to these players.
Hope this helps.
If television is chewing gum for the mind, then the prequels are the worlds first visual laxative.
CrumbY
This user is offline.
thanks for your input