negative1
This user is offline.
negative1
AntcuFaalb said:
here's a clarification of the
machine and setup:
---------------------------------------------
I don't follow this thread often, but I do have a question. Are you snapping each picture by hand or is it automated somehow?
automated
video
-----------------------------------
http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Making-our-own-35mm-preservation-my-crazy-proposal/post/584555/#TopicPost584555
in trailer
-----------------------------------
http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Making-our-own-35mm-preservation-my-crazy-proposal/post/584009/#TopicPost584009
reference
-----------------------------------
http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Making-our-own-35mm-preservation-my-crazy-proposal/post/584561/#TopicPost584561
http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Making-our-own-35mm-preservation-my-crazy-proposal/post/584122/#TopicPost584122
http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Making-our-own-35mm-preservation-my-crazy-proposal/post/584158/#TopicPost584158
later
-1
[no GOUT in CED?-> GOUT CED]
kitt1987
This user is offline.
After anonymously reading the forum the last few weeks I finally decided to create an account and applaud you for the effort in bringing Star Wars back to the fans in hi def. I read that ESB is already preserved, is there another site or index where we can follow the progress, if any, involved in that film?
negative1
This user is offline.
negative1kitt1987 said:
After anonymously reading the forum the last few weeks I finally decided to create an account and applaud you for the effort in bringing Star Wars back to the fans in hi def. I read that ESB is already preserved, is there another site or index where we can follow the progress, if any, involved in that film?
all of that work was chronicled
from about aug 2011 to feb 2012
at a private blog.
it has been archived. and will be
released in the future when the
restoration is done. i might post
some previews when we're done
with star wars.
we are currently reworking some
of the parts with damage, and expect
it to be complete in the next year or
so. it's about 70-80% watchable
right now, but the last parts are
going to take awhile to get done right.
later
-1
[no GOUT in CED?-> GOUT CED]
lucasdroid
This user is offline.
kitt1987 said:
After anonymously reading the forum the last few weeks I finally decided to create an account and applaud you for the effort in bringing Star Wars back to the fans in hi def. I read that ESB is already preserved, is there another site or index where we can follow the progress, if any, involved in that film?
Can you call this a preservation? I think this is great but a real preservation needs to be made. I guess we will not see that until Mr. Lucas passes away though.
Taking a photo right off the film with the lcd light sounds smart. It would probably avoid losing quality over projecting the film onto ground glass like a real optical printer would. This should produce some interesting results but nothing like a real preservation. Especially since the source materials have to be a mess. This is a slight step above the 16mm work being done.
Molly
This user is offline.
U u uwa uwa...![]()
Let him get bored and go back under his bridge by himself.
"Right now the coffees are doing their final work." (Airi, Masked Rider Den-o episode 1)
negative1
This user is offline.
negative1lucasdroid said:
kitt1987 said:
After anonymously reading the forum the last few weeks I finally decided to create an account and applaud you for the effort in bringing Star Wars back to the fans in hi def. I read that ESB is already preserved, is there another site or index where we can follow the progress, if any, involved in that film?
Can you call this a preservation? I think this is great but a real preservation needs to be made. I guess we will not see that until Mr. Lucas passes away though.
Taking a photo right off the film with the lcd light sounds smart. It would probably avoid losing quality over projecting the film onto ground glass like a real optical printer would. This should produce some interesting results but nothing like a real preservation. Especially since the source materials have to be a mess. This is a slight step above the 16mm work being done.
well, we should be ok
[no GOUT in CED?-> GOUT CED]
lucasdroid
This user is offline.
I downloaded the video and I love the shots that expand that show the soundtrack. Very cool. It does actually look pretty good too.
Brooks
This user is offline.
lucasdroid said:
This is a slight step above the 16mm work being done.
It's a "slight step" that I (and most everyone else here) am eagerly awaiting with great anticipation! : )
ohms
This user is offline.
Same here. Can't wait to see it.
Far more interested in projects going on here than any official Lucasfilm releases. That's a pretty sorry state of affairs.
negative1
This user is offline.
negative1lucasdroid said:
I downloaded the video and I love the shots that expand that show the soundtrack. Very cool. It does actually look pretty good too.
sure, thanks. glad to hear all the interest
and support from all of you.
i have another test clip that shows something
similiar. will post that in awhile.
in the meantime, here's the second set
of test color correcting the red clips:
--------------------------------------------
later
-1
[no GOUT in CED?-> GOUT CED]
negative1
This user is offline.
negative1here's some preview frames
showing the expanding view
look, that happened by accident:
=======================
http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/cleaning-up-dirty-frames-for-scenes/post/589217/#TopicPost589217
also i dug up some early test pics
we did with the empire strikes back,
so i'll post those also, for those
interested in those.
later
-1
[no GOUT in CED?-> GOUT CED]
negative1
This user is offline.
negative1just to fill in people on
the empire strikes back.
some shots of the film:
--------------------------------







later
-1
[no GOUT in CED?-> GOUT CED]
negative1
This user is offline.
negative1and some actual shots from
the print color corrected:
----------------------------------------
later
-1
[no GOUT in CED?-> GOUT CED]
VideoPhonic
This user is offline.
-1, is your remark about 70-80% watchability and year+ time frame referring to ESB? If so that's extremely exciting, especially because those color corrected frames of ESB look fantastic.....looking forward to more.
ww12345
This user is offline.
While we're at it, how's the process coming on Ep. IV? Just wondering - don't want to sound anxious... :)
jero32
This user is offline.
Man those esb shots look awesome. Can't wait til its out.
negative1
This user is offline.
negative1thanks for the comments everyone.
star wars is coming to the end for the first
pass, and the color correction stuff should
be done pretty quickly. the adjustments
and stability stuff along with the dirt
and cleanup is still going to take awhile.
along with the sound and final renders.
we still don't have a date, but as it gets
closer, we'll keep posting updates.
here's some more comparison esb shots
vs 35mm and 70mm scans..
------------------------------------------------------
http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Star-Wars-Colortiming-Cinematography-was-What-changes-was-done-to-STAR-WARS-in-93/post/589523/#TopicPost589523
although we've done a lot of work on empire, it's going
to have wait quite awhile until we polish off star wars
first, and then we'll get back to it. some people would
be ok with it in the condition its in now. but only if you
could take the 15-20 minutes that still need a lot of
clean up and digital fixes to stability and dewarping.
later
-1
[no GOUT in CED?-> GOUT CED]
cboy007
This user is offline.
Beautiful shots. I also love seeing pictures of the reels and equipment. Thanks for sharing those as well.
negative1
This user is offline.
negative1another test sample from the red reel,
showing the expanding frame sequence:
-----------------------------------------------------
later
-1
[no GOUT in CED?-> GOUT CED]
negative1
This user is offline.
negative1here's another take on the
last sequence slightly color corrected:
----------------------------------------------
later
-1
[no GOUT in CED?-> GOUT CED]
TK-949
This user is offline.
Advanced Padawan LearnerI don't know if this has been answered before: Are you making a 4k version, that will be scaled down to 1080p when you're done, or do you scale the stuff down before you start working?
Will you also release the 4k version for download (if you're making one).
I'm asking because I would try to recreate the Movietrailer for Star Wars in 1080p, but the Trailer was in 1.78:1, which means I would have to upscale the movie first...
"I wonder if George Lucas will ever replace himself with CGI. He should do. He's a muppet." - Simon Pegg
negative1
This user is offline.
negative1TK-949 said:
I don't know if this has been answered before: Are you making a 4k version, that will be scaled down to 1080p when you're done, or do you scale the stuff down before you start working?
Will you also release the 4k version for download (if you're making one).
I'm asking because I would try to recreate the Movietrailer for Star Wars in 1080p, but the Trailer was in 1.78:1, which means I would have to upscale the movie first...
we're scaling stuff down before working on it:
================================
it's a lot harder to work in 4K..
the raw files alone would take up to 15-20 Terabytes
to hold the scan... i can't imagine how much bigger
the video would be.. instead of a 25 Gig disc, you
would have to use 50 Gig blurays, etc.. and unless
you had a really fast computer, you woudn't be able
to watch video at that resolution (i can't).
later
-1
[no GOUT in CED?-> GOUT CED]
AntcuFaalb
This user is offline.
The Interweb is a Series of Tubesnegative1 said:
TK-949 said:
I don't know if this has been answered before: Are you making a 4k version, that will be scaled down to 1080p when you're done, or do you scale the stuff down before you start working?
Will you also release the 4k version for download (if you're making one).
I'm asking because I would try to recreate the Movietrailer for Star Wars in 1080p, but the Trailer was in 1.78:1, which means I would have to upscale the movie first...we're scaling stuff down before working on it:
================================
http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Making-our-own-35mm-preservation-my-crazy-proposal/post/584238/#TopicPost584238
it's a lot harder to work in 4K..
the raw files alone would take up to 15-20 Terabytes
to hold the scan... i can't imagine how much bigger
the video would be.. instead of a 25 Gig disc, you
would have to use 50 Gig blurays, etc.. and unless
you had a really fast computer, you woudn't be able
to watch video at that resolution (i can't).
later
-1
Do you (can you?!) plan to release a non-cleaned-up scaled-down version? It'd be very useful for those of us who'd like to play with the raw scans, but can't afford to send you 15-20TB worth of hard-drives.
What resizing algorithm do you plan to use to scale-down the images?
What you're doing is amazing -- thanks!
"And I'm shocked at you Moth3r for being off-topic, Because if people off-topic you say "stay on-topic, STAY on-topic, STAY ON-TOPIC", and we are not in the Off topic section of OT.com, now are we?" –pat man
"Look again." –Moth3r
–
"whouse erica,frank???!" –pat man 2
"Whouse youse, pam man?" –TV's Frink
–
"david.i dont get it,what is "whouse"??????" –pat man 2
"Do you even look at what you write in your own posts?" –Davnes007
negative1
This user is offline.
negative1AntcuFaalb said:
Do you (can you?!) plan to release a non-cleaned-up scaled-down version? It'd be very useful for those of us who'd like to play with the raw scans, but can't afford to send you 15-20TB worth of hard-drives.
What resizing algorithm do you plan to use to scale-down the images?
What you're doing is amazing -- thanks!
there are plans for the raw image data
to be released. but we haven't finalized
it yet, because we are adding more capture
data, and the size of it is around 6-8 T. It's
going to be hard to figure out how to do shipping
and things for. i don't have highspeed connections,
so putting it up on usenet is out of the questions,
and it's way to much data to put on disks. so
unless someone can come up with a good plan,
it's going to be very tricky. we never had to deal
with this amount of data before.
later
-1
[no GOUT in CED?-> GOUT CED]
Puggo - Jar Jar's Yoda
This user is offline.
legendary but little-known Jedi Masterlucasdroid said:
This is a slight step above the 16mm work being done.
Replace "slight" with "major".