lucasdroid
This user is offline.
How long have you been working on this project -1? Will you post schematics of your scanning machine so that others may attempt to do what you are doing? It would be very helpful for even non Star Wars related material.
none
This user is offline.
^ here's possibly a first post: [June 28, 2008] http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Making-our-own-35mm-preservation-my-crazy-proposal/post/322215/#TopicPost322215
and he's given the statistics on the still camera and programing hack to control it's automated usage, along with the system controlling the film. It's all in the thread.
negative1
This user is offline.
negative1lucasdroid said:
How long have you been working on this project -1? Will you post schematics of your scanning machine so that others may attempt to do what you are doing? It would be very helpful for even non Star Wars related material.
this is where most of that information is
concerning the equipment:
----------------------------------------------------
http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Making-our-own-35mm-preservation-my-crazy-proposal/topic/5853/page/37/
http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Making-our-own-35mm-preservation-my-crazy-proposal/topic/5853/page/38/
later
-1
[no GOUT in CED?-> GOUT CED]
TV's Frink
This user is offline.
Likes Lens FlairsActually I think Stinky is right on this one.jero32 said:
It's actually letting out a somewhat high pitched shriek of awesome.
lucasdroid
This user is offline.
I know about what was previously said but I was hoping to get more specifics on what model numbers on the equipment being used. I understand the basics. What is the film being projected on? Ground glass? I would like to construct something similar maybe with a Nikon D300 shooting RAW files. Thor's footage with the scanner was stupendous. The stills look good but moving video might be something completely different. I doubt a consumer camera has the dynamic range needed to capture all the information from film.
negative1
This user is offline.
negative1lucasdroid said:
I know about what was previously said but I was hoping to get more specifics on what model numbers on the equipment being used. I understand the basics. What is the film being projected on? Ground glass? I would like to construct something similar maybe with a Nikon D300 shooting RAW files. Thor's footage with the scanner was stupendous. The stills look good but moving video might be something completely different. I doubt a consumer camera has the dynamic range needed to capture all the information from film.
gotcha,
i'll find out what i can. although some of the equipment
is no longer made, or made from improvised parts.
it's basically a modified film strip projector.
the pulley system is based off a vhs motor, and connected
so that it moves at the rate of about 2 frames per second.
we used a manual system before which was much more
tedious. there's a lens between the camera and the
projector. i'll try to find out the light source type also.
later
-1
[no GOUT in CED?-> GOUT CED]
negative1
This user is offline.
negative1here's some more samples of frames
from the last clip.
again, these are just to show some tests,
if you notice, you will see more image
than any GOUT version since we haven't
cropped anything it yet, which is from 3-5%
of the image
==================================
http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/cleaning-up-dirty-frames-for-scenes/post/588594/#TopicPost588594
for more information on the various cropping
issues, check:
==============================
http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Cropping-the-Original-Trilogy-35mm-vs-dvd-gout/topic/13945/
later
-1
[no GOUT in CED?-> GOUT CED]
jero32
This user is offline.
<p>What photoshop/other program options do you typically use to correct the red colour? In gimp the "curves" option (under colors etc) seems to work, but I can't get all the red out sometimes.<br /><br />edit: using tint and saturation seems to work a little but it might've taken out a bit too much color.</p>
negative1
This user is offline.
negative1lucasdroid said:
I know about what was previously said but I was hoping to get more specifics on what model numbers on the equipment being used. I understand the basics. What is the film being projected on? Ground glass? I would like to construct something similar maybe with a Nikon D300 shooting RAW files. Thor's footage with the scanner was stupendous. The stills look good but moving video might be something completely different. I doubt a consumer camera has the dynamic range needed to capture all the information from film.
from cinch, who made the machine:
[no GOUT in CED?-> GOUT CED]
red5-626
This user is offline.
I No My Spelling and Grammar Stinks. If I offend I am Sorry.Found this video.
Is the machine any thing like this .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFFzF_d1Sd4&feature=related
see 4:26
negative1
This user is offline.
negative1jero32 said:
What photoshop/other program options do you typically use to correct the red colour? In gimp the "curves" option (under colors etc) seems to work, but I can't get all the red out sometimes.
edit: using tint and saturation seems to work a little but it might've taken out a bit too much color.
adobe premiere a little bit (for me), along with virtual dub..
but we mostly using the professional AVID suite.
here are 2 examples of the early attempts to
correct the red tint:
==================================
later
-1
[no GOUT in CED?-> GOUT CED]
negative1
This user is offline.
negative1red5-626 said:
Found this video.
Is the machine any thing like this .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFFzF_d1Sd4&feature=relatedsee 4:26
not really,
there's a dukane filmstrip project on youtube with
a record player. it's more like that.
later
-1
[no GOUT in CED?-> GOUT CED]
Nearsighted Scrappile
This user is offline.
Will be malfunctioning within a day.Star Wars is the only case in modern film history where the preservation of the original award-winning version has been left up to the fans. That fact alone proves that Lucas is insane.
lucasdroid
This user is offline.
What are you projecting the image onto? The only other way to do it would be to take a picture right off of the film?
ww12345
This user is offline.
<p>If I understand correctly, that's exactly what he's doing.</p>
none
This user is offline.
lucasdroid wrote: The only other way to do it would be to take a picture right off of the film?
Gotta agree, if you want an 80s appropriate film preservation methodology using the silly putty trick is a novel and inspiring choice.
jero32
This user is offline.
I Thought he was basicly taking a picture of the projection directly. (so not bounced off a screen)
VideoPhonic
This user is offline.
<p>-1, are you making use of any of the red version for your final version, or only for reference and color tinkering? curious.</p>
negative1
This user is offline.
negative1VideoPhonic said:
-1, are you making use of any of the red version for your final version, or only for reference and color tinkering? curious.
not from the test reel. that's just for playing around with.
the other 5 reels we have, might have some frames that have
less grain than the LPP, so we might use some of that.
jero32 said:
I Thought he was basicly taking a picture of the projection directly. (so not bounced off a screen)
yes, the video and pictures of the setup show that we have the camera
directly mounted to take pictures directly through the lens off the lcd
illuminated film.
later
-1
[no GOUT in CED?-> GOUT CED]
negative1
This user is offline.
negative1here's a clarification of the
machine and setup:
---------------------------------------------







later
-1
[no GOUT in CED?-> GOUT CED]
red5-626
This user is offline.
I No My Spelling and Grammar Stinks. If I offend I am Sorry.
WOW I feel a bit like Lumpy watching the Boba Fett cartoon. I just hope the storm troopers don’t come in the room.
negative1
This user is offline.
negative1dug up some scans of
the 1976 trailer, that i had before.
but haven't posted them...
these are untouched
============================
later
-1
[no GOUT in CED?-> GOUT CED]
lucasdroid
This user is offline.
Impressive...most impressive.
negative1
This user is offline.
negative1more examples of the 35mm trailer,
some are kind of blurry:
----------------------------------------------
later
-1
[no GOUT in CED?-> GOUT CED]
AntcuFaalb
This user is offline.
The Interweb is a Series of Tubeshere's a clarification of the
machine and setup:
---------------------------------------------
I don't follow this thread often, but I do have a question. Are you snapping each picture by hand or is it automated somehow?
"And I'm shocked at you Moth3r for being off-topic, Because if people off-topic you say "stay on-topic, STAY on-topic, STAY ON-TOPIC", and we are not in the Off topic section of OT.com, now are we?" –pat man
"Look again." –Moth3r
–
"whouse erica,frank???!" –pat man 2
"Whouse youse, pam man?" –TV's Frink
–
"david.i dont get it,what is "whouse"??????" –pat man 2
"Do you even look at what you write in your own posts?" –Davnes007