Interview With Richard Marquand Director of Return of the Jedi (June 1983)

  • Reply
  • Print
rortiz77's avatar
RE: Interview With Richard Marquand Director of Return of the Jedi (June 1983)

Tobar said:

But he will say that filming the ending, which was the first sequence shot, wasn't easy.

Wasn't the first sequence shot the Tatooine sandstorm scene?

Sluggo's avatar
RE: Interview With Richard Marquand Director of Return of the Jedi (June 1983)

Ye.

 

Marquand mentions that there are "there are some deeply sad moments in this movie".  I wonder how much of these still exist with all of George's tinkering.

When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish memes.

Check out my reconstruction of the ROTJ Shooting Script

rortiz77's avatar
RE: Interview With Richard Marquand Director of Return of the Jedi (June 1983)

Sluggo said:

Marquand mentions that there are "there are some deeply sad moments in this movie".

Marquand was being prophetic, he was in fact describing some of the changes for the BD.

skyjedi2005's avatar
RE: Interview With Richard Marquand Director of Return of the Jedi (June 1983)

I think the first choice the American director was Spielberg, but since Lucas left the DGA, and Spielberg was a member he could not be used, i am sure Lucas tried to work something out and was unsuccessful.  Lucas had a hell of a fun time doing raiders with Spielberg and described it as the best possible collaboration experience.

He also tried to get Ron Howard to direct the Phantom Menace, and wanted Spielberg for possibly attack of the clones or revenge of the sith.

Still Lucas never returned to the guild and he still has yet to let the grudge end. 

 

Also word got around Hollywood just the allegedly atrocious way and controlling manner Lucas had treated the other directors, on empire and on jedi, and so no director even if Lucas was in the guild would touch it. The man's ego was a huge obstacle.

For the longest time he and Francis were not on speaking terms either according to Skywalking because of the the size of the two  griant egos.

He has never amicably patched things up with Marcia, somewhat understandable, but his grudge against kurtz, and Prowse make no sense.

Wonder if he ever patched things up with milius probably not, he never did patch things up with Dykstra.

 

You either supposedly follow general Lucas orders or you are out of his circle forever.

Last edited on September 1, 2011 at 6:43 AM by skyjedi2005

 "Always loved Vader's wordless self sacrifice. Another shitty, clueless, revision like Greedo and young Anakin's ghost. What a fucking shame." -Simon Pegg.

Bester's avatar
RE: Interview With Richard Marquand Director of Return of the Jedi (June 1983)

Wasn't Marquand simply Lucas's puppet?  I understand that after his absence from the ESB set, Lucas insisted on having a very strong presence on the ROTJ set.  I believe that Lucas regretted being away from the ESB set (the control freak that he is).  Hiring a puppet director was his way of ensuring that ESB didn't happen all over again.

 

In Abrams I Trust

Bester's avatar
RE: Interview With Richard Marquand Director of Return of the Jedi (June 1983)

Somewhere floating around on the net is an old newspaper interview (from before ESB's release) in which Prowse announced that Vader was Luke's father.  But various sources have stated that Prowse wasn't privvy to this information during filming.  So, was it just a good guess?

Anyway, Prowse was indeed blamed for a leak and side-lined from many important scenes in ROTJ (which made use of a stand-in in the Vader suit).

 

In Abrams I Trust

Ovan Marekal's avatar
RE: Interview With Richard Marquand Director of Return of the Jedi (June 1983)

I've heard that David Lynch was approached for Jedi (Lucas loved Eraserhead, and Lynch had been quite malleable to producer Mel Brooks on The Elephant Man), but Lynch turned it down -- although I suspect some of his ideas for Jedi (insane, rich pustule-y fat man, as well as probably some of the designs) went into his eventual Dune.

Bingowings' avatar
RE: Interview With Richard Marquand Director of Return of the Jedi (June 1983)

That was largely in the book in first place and filtered through Lynch's own particular taste for the grotesque which was already established on film the year Star Wars came out.

  • Anál nathrach,
    orth’ bháis’s bethad,
    do chél dénmha
Lovable Rogue's avatar
RE: Interview With Richard Marquand Director of Return of the Jedi (June 1983)

Marquand calls himself an actor's director because he says he is "very interested in directing actors—many directors direct cameras. I think the actors felt very lost and almost neglected on Empire. The special effects sort of rode through that movie in terms of the actors being left alone.

"I was lucky in this film. The major actors who carried the story and dialogue were by now very experienced at this nightmarish way of working. They were used to it and knew how to deal with it."

Ok, I get what Marquand is saying here. It's a fair point on special effect laden films, especially now with so much cgi and less real props. 

But Empire has the best performances out of any Star Wars movie cause the late, great Irvin Kershner knew how to direct actors. Not just "in theory" but in reality. The actors all have warm things to say about him too, Kershner is the REAL Yoda!

Needs to be said by somebody.

Last edited on September 1, 2011 at 11:08 PM by Lovable Rogue
Lovable Rogue's avatar
RE: Interview With Richard Marquand Director of Return of the Jedi (June 1983)

SilverWook said:

I don't think anybody involved on the films had the perspective in the mid 80's we now enjoy on watching Empire. Even Peter Mayhew once called it "a bit mediocre".

I can understand how Empire's unothodox plot structure and dark tone would have baffled some people in the 80s looking for a "fun" sequel, but there is no denying it has the most rock-solid story and best acted character progression moments of any star wars flick. Hell, maybe of any sequel period.

I much, much prefer "in-training" Luke in Empire to the naive, moisture farm bumpkin of Star Wars or "stoic" Jedi luke who is frankly a total bore who loses some of his humanity.

Han feels just right too in advancing from the first flick without being Jedi's teddy bear.

Every character seemingly lost their edge in Jedi, and the director bears much responsiblity 4 that even if he was Lucas' puppet in the end. 

Last edited on September 1, 2011 at 11:26 PM by Lovable Rogue
Ovan Marekal's avatar
RE: Interview With Richard Marquand Director of Return of the Jedi (June 1983)

Bingowings said:

That was largely in the book in first place and filtered through Lynch's own particular taste for the grotesque which was already established on film the year Star Wars came out.

The book didn't have Harkonnen with pustules or have him flying wildly around on his anti-gravity belt -- that seems more like a Lucas-ian absurdity than anything Frank Herbert would dream up.

Oh, and the heart-plugs; mustn't forget the heart-plugs...

skyjedi2005's avatar
RE: Interview With Richard Marquand Director of Return of the Jedi (June 1983)

Now all we need is a truthful telling of the making of the film, and i hope Fans hold Rinzler to that, to a certain point i mean.

Not to the point it would get beardy mad at him and get him fired.

You can bet the matter of Marcia and the divorce will be skipped over, even though that is a huge reason for why star wars is as it is today post 1983.

Like a pro she finished her editing on Jedi even though she and George were done.

 "Always loved Vader's wordless self sacrifice. Another shitty, clueless, revision like Greedo and young Anakin's ghost. What a fucking shame." -Simon Pegg.

Fang Zei's avatar
RE: Interview With Richard Marquand Director of Return of the Jedi (June 1983)

skyjedi2005 said:

"He also tried to get Ron Howard to direct the Phantom Menace"

Is this true???!!! First I've heard of this!

The subject of why other people didn't direct the prequels is the one I'm most fascinated by, and thusfar I've come across next to zero info regarding it. I don't remember even Zombie's book having much on it.

In the Leonard Maltin interviews on the '95 vhs, Lucas mentions "I might direct the first one." Where did you hear about Ron Howard???!!! Yeah, obviously he and Lucas go all the way back to Graffiti and then worked together again on Willow, so I'm not exactly surprised to find this out. I would still love to know where you heard/read about this, though.

skyjedi2005's avatar
RE: Interview With Richard Marquand Director of Return of the Jedi (June 1983)

Was it the Marcus Hearn Lucas book, i think so.  But i would have to check.

 "Always loved Vader's wordless self sacrifice. Another shitty, clueless, revision like Greedo and young Anakin's ghost. What a fucking shame." -Simon Pegg.

Bothan's Pies' avatar
RE: Interview With Richard Marquand Director of Return of the Jedi (June 1983)

SilverWook said:

Prowse has claimed for years he was unfairly blamed for a script leak during production on Jedi and things got very unpleasant on the set after that.

As far as I understand it, the Daily Mail leaked Vader's death before the movie was released.

Prowse has since claimed a reporter had somehow got wind of Shaw's role as Anakin Skywalker and duped him into showing him the call sheet with Sebastian Shaw's scene on it as confirmation, under the pretense of be interested in interviewing Prowse about his weightlifting career.

Not sure how much truth there is in any of that, or whether that is genuinely the cause of the ongoing rift between Prowse and Lucas either way.

Members reading this topic: None