SW
This user is offline.
Padawan LearnerCable-X1
This user is offline.
Jedi Knightzombie84
This user is offline.
Jedi KnightThe Secret History of Star Wars -- now available on Amazon.com!
"When George went back and put new creatures into the original Star Wars, I find that disturbing. It’s a revision of history. That bothers me."
--James Cameron, Entertainment Weekly, April 2010
Ozkeeper
This user is offline.
Padawan LearnerCO
This user is offline.
I am ready for the trials!Cable-X1
This user is offline.
Jedi Knightxhonzi
This user is offline.
Bringing to pass the 2015 of Back to the Future Part IICable-X1 said:
I think the PT made in the 80s would have rocked the hell out of us. One of the downfalls of the PT was that Lucas waiting too damn long. He shouldn't have let us catch a breath after Jedi. Maybe given it a year or two and then launched into it. That would have been much better.
So true about accepting the inferior ROTJ...I'll take the Ewoks over Jar Jar any day.
It's true. Without decades of "catching our breath" and "hearing all of the various plans and rumours as to how things would shake out" and "using our own imaginations which turned out to be better than George's" we would have all like the PT much better. It probably would have been made better, but who can say?
The other factor is that there wouldn't have been as much extensive EU before the prequels either. I know that Lucasfilm said the PT timeframe was off limits to the EU authors, but that didn't stop The Thrawn Trilogy, Dark Empire, Children of the Jedi, etc... from casting long shadows back on galactic history, especially in regards to the Jedi and the Clone Wars. It still makes me wonder what some of their other ideas were for the Clone Wars. Probably superior to the ones we got., or would have gotten in the late 80s. So maybe it's not all bad that the PT didn't come out right away.
IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!
"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005
"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM
"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.
EyeShotFirst
This user is offline.
Back to work on Blu Ray and DVD coversI often poder that question myself. Yes, sometimes I think "Why did he not make them first?" but after all, I don't hate the way things are. It would be easier if A New Hope was Episode I. We didn't really need to see how that shit went down. We bounced like a dog staring at a beggin strip in his owners hand. The whole problem with Star Wars is, we get things explained to us. Blader Runner was the weirdest movie when I first saw it. There were many questions I asked myself. I watched it a few times then understood it in the end. Star Wars would have been so much better if things weren't explained. It isn't like it is a movie you have to pay attention to. You know what is going on in A New Hope. Then you get to the prequels and you are spoonfed every single little detail. It takes the fantasy out of it when someone has to explain it. I would rather remain ignorant to those little details then have them shoved in my face like "this is who/what/where it is" So the films were all quite good. Just episodes I-III had the 'Fantasy' aspect removed. Yes they were epic but you knew everything. We are not all that dumb, though don't get me wrong I had a girlfriend that was. It is just a matter of paying attention or not. And if you are at the theater you are forced to pay attention. My eyes are wide open George Lucas. I need not know who he/her is or what this/that is. Those little things distract from the main characters. All we need to know is
1. Who the Hero/Leading Characters are
2. Who the bad guys are.
3. Why they are fighting
Presto that is it. It goes back to the days of the stage. When all we had was human beings and a few props. We don't need anything else to be entertained. Not saying avoid the special effects. Just focus on characters who are important. Other characters can just stay in the background. Instead every character in the prequels seem to have a significant story that is explained in the film. Boba Fett would have been way cooler if he was just that guy who popped up in Empire Strikes Back who said 4 lines. Instead we are given a young child who looses his daddy and is sad. It is so much better to just wonder who that guy is than actually know. So the prequels werent bad stories. They werent executed as written.

"The other versions will disappear. Even the 35 million tapes of Star Wars out there won't last more than 30 or 40 years. A hundred years from now, the only version of the movie that anyone will remember will be the DVD version [of the Special Edition], and you'll be able to project it on a 20' by 40' screen with perfect quality. I think it's the director's prerogative, not the studio's to go back and reinvent a movie." - George Lucas
skyjedi2005
This user is offline.
Jedi KnightI wonder if any of the EU others at Bantam books or del rey could have written better prequels as novels, not novelizations. But based on the original ideas kurtz and Lucas put together in the late 70's.
Except for the necessary changes that Vader is Anakin Skywalker, they are not seperate characters. Oh and Luke And Leia are his children,lol.
I wonder what an alternate sequel to star wars would have been like, a revenge story probably. Luke gets revenge for the murder of his father and His teacher Obi Wan.
This would have really led into a revenge of a jedi story. Lucas determined sith take revenge not jedi.
If Empire and Jedi were not made as they are the story could have gone anywhere.
"Always loved Vader's wordless self sacrifice. Another shitty, clueless, revision like Greedo and young Anakin's ghost. What a fucking shame." -Simon Pegg.