Well, I thought about that but it seems like an awful lot of work recreating the crawl the way I did the 1977 one just to have it as an extra.

roback214 said:

hi!

I Have the first spansih (mexican) dubbing... sampler here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ubTVG1imwYo&feature=youtu.be

I live in Chile, South America, sorry if my English is not very good. I have the audio of the 3 movies. I'm adjusting to the versions "Despecialized"
hopefully be of any use.
The audio comes from old betamax tapes recorded at the time that the television broadcast here in Chile.

 

That's great--many prefer the Latin American Spanish dubs over the Castilian ones!  Once you have synced audio for all three movies, send me the links!  I'd love to hear them!

EDIT: And if you finish syncing audio for the first one before the others, let me know too.

roback214 said:

When will the version 2.5?

Very soon.  But it's been "very soon" for a while ;)

Beyond that, we just don't know.  Would love to hear that file, thanks!

If you're using VLC to watch 2.1, there was a VLC-specific bug in the subs (flashing for one frame) which is fixed in the latest version of Project Threepio.

To see the ones in 2.1, you'd need to use MPC or a hardware player.

Well Project Threepio are subs for Harmy's DeEds. They're not separate versions.

L0conut said:

What's the difference between Project Threepio and Harmy's versions, if you don't mind my asking? 

Project Threepio is an ongoing subtitle project not tied to any particular preservation.  When Harmy wants subtitles for his project, he gets the latest subtitles that are available at the time.  So Harmy's subs in DeEd 2.1 are equivalent to Project Threepio 5.1, which had the problems I was talking about earlier.

There have been two versions of Project Threepio released since DeEd 2.1, and DeEd 2.5 will include those updates (including fixes for the VLC issue).

You can click the image link in my signature to see the discussion thread, including release notes for each version.

Harmy said:

Well, the GP was fairly easy (though, it's probably not perfect, since it's pretty hard with a blurry reference like that) but the X one I could probably try to approximate but it would probably be far from what it actually looked like with this picture as a reference - I can't even read the text (if I had to guess, I'd say it says: "NO ONE UNDER 17 ADMITTED / AGE LIMIT MAY VARY IN CERTAIN AREAS" but I'm just guessing).

Thank you Harmy! This would go great with THX 1138, as it was originally rated GP. :)

I can dig up a better screenshot of the X card if you need it.

I know I am always late to the game on things but  GP is or was a real rating?

Troyig88 said:

I know I am always late to the game on things but  GP is or was a real rating?

 

 

 Yes it was and 'Google is your friend'.

Edit:  Here you go:

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motion_Picture_Association_of_America_film_rating_system

I remember when GP came out.  I also remember it seemed strange when it switched to PG.

It sounds strange to me now to hear the GP ratings on the older James Bond movies but now I know what it means 

Vader: "I want 2.5, not excuses."

Yoda: "Patience!"