AntcuFaalb
This user is offline.
The Interweb is a Series of TubesTV's Frink said:
I can't tell what was emphasized, can I get some italics as well? ;-)
Fixed.
"And I'm shocked at you Moth3r for being off-topic, Because if people off-topic you say "stay on-topic, STAY on-topic, STAY ON-TOPIC", and we are not in the Off topic section of OT.com, now are we?" –pat man
"Look again." –Moth3r
kiltedwookie
This user is offline.
Hey y'all, been lurking around the forum for a while trying to wrap my mind around the whole process. Anybody still have any Spleen invites left? Is there a place to find people with invites available?
kilted
dblake83
This user is offline.
TK-423 said:
And how come the MKV of Star Wars 2.0 is nearly twice as large as the AVCHDs of all the 1.0 releases?
Harmy
This user is offline.
Han D. SoloBecause the MKV's better quality. There's an 8GB AVCHD of v2.0 as well.
Pennsylvania Jones said:
"Stick and Stones will break my bones but the Blu-Rays will never Harmy."
Lucas: I am altering the film. Pray I don't alter it any further.
Fans: This film is getting worse all the time!
dblake83
This user is offline.
TK-423 said:
And how come the MKV of Star Wars 2.0 is nearly twice as large as the AVCHDs of all the 1.0 releases?
This topic has alrady addressed that. Here is a brief recap:
With either the right playback gear OR the the right eyes/vision compression in the data packets is highly noticable via artifacts, color depth and so on...
Harmy is spending what may amount to thousands of hours, to have it ruined in the absolute final phase in order to save a few GB would be a huge crime. It's 2013 not 1999, rather hard to believe there are those concerned with an extra 10-15GB. Regardless of the compression method there is ALWAYS loss.
Luckily for mankind Harmy agrees and his efforts will not be comprimised by a small faction thats seems to be only concerned with getting 2.1 or 2.5 [I like 2.5 better] small enough to fit on a phone or some other device with a teeny tiny display. Don't get why anyone woudld want to see it that way myself, as this is meant to be seen in full glory on a large screen. Kudos to harmy for not yielding to the faction who seems to desire a result worse than what Lucus would allow us.
Those who for whatever reason want smaller file size there are plenty of free tools that will allow you to do (ruin) that ON YOUR OWN and google/yahoo/duckduckgo/etc can be your friend unless you are too lazy of course....
box
This user is offline.
dblake83 said:
TK-423 said:
And how come the MKV of Star Wars 2.0 is nearly twice as large as the AVCHDs of all the 1.0 releases?
This topic has alrady addressed that. Here is a brief recap:
With either the right playback gear OR the the right eyes/vision compression in the data packets is highly noticable via artifacts, color depth and so on...
[...]
Those who for whatever reason want smaller file size there are plenty of free tools that will allow you to do (ruin) that ON YOUR OWN and google/yahoo/duckduckgo/etc can be your friend unless you are too lazy of course....
dblake83, I really don't believe that TK-423 was advocating for a smaller file. He's asking legitimate questions about an apparent discrepancy in file size between versions. Please don't jump down his throat or assume he wants anything other than clarification. Let's try to keep the dialog civil here.
TV's Frink
This user is offline.
Ointment FlyDuckduckgo? Do you own stock or something?
PaulisDead2221
This user is offline.
I am ready for the trials!Harmy said:
Yes. I'm hoping for a release next month - only reel 6 left to do and I don't recall there being much I wanted to fix - I just don't have the time to work on it just now.
Thanks so much for the invite. I dled the entire trilogy in their current versions and it was an awesome experience. Consistency in clarity was entirely convincing even when I knew the source was GOUT/LD/etc and the more intricate fixes involving matte work were quite perfect.
I'm happy to hear there will be more releases, because I saw issues with black levels and color correction. Regardless I think this set is the most perfect form of the films in their original state we can hope for at this time.
torkus
This user is offline.
Hi Harmy,
I'm just as eager to play the fruits of your labour!
I am d/ling as we speak from uloz.to
However, I noticed that parts 47 & 53 of DEED_v2.0 is not loading.
I get the "Bad gateway 502" message.
Can you please possibly reupload these files?
Thanks in advance.
bilditup1
This user is offline.
Jedi of the Mosaic FaithSince the project has evolved beyond just a simple patch here and there, I think 2.5 makes more sense than 2.1 (a nomenclature which I first proposed to begin with). Using 2.1 opens up the possibility of pressure to make 2.2, 2.3, 2.4 &c, esp from people who don't understand how difficult the process of making these restoration edits are. 2.5 is clean and, if I may be so bold, adds extra motive to get things right, once (no, I'm not complaining that 2.5 even has to be made; quite happy with 2.0 here). Also, it's not like releasing in 0.5 increments is unheard of. Maybe for people who don't remember dial-up or something, and why should they be catered to?
"I find your lack of faith disturbing."
Harmy's SW Despecialized Edition | ABCs OT Sound Salvage | ESB OST - Imperial Audiophile Edition
michaelkirschner
This user is offline.
Undead PixelOne of my favorite parts of the Despecialized Star Wars is the music only track, it really delivers a unique experience to watch without dialog. I haven't gotten a chance to watch the entire film with the music only track but the parts I have seen are very good. I would highly recommend that you extend the same treatment to ESB and ROTJ
TV's Frink
This user is offline.
Ointment FlyHarmy (and some other fan editors) get some love on Wired:
http://www.wired.com/geekdad/2013/02/star-wars-fandom-editors/
tortugash
This user is offline.
Airwave said:
tortugash said:
I'm downloading the current version (v2.0) right now. I discovered the annoyance that is the CAPTCHA. For all yall, it's the thing that prompts you to "retype these letters" in JDownloader every 10-seconds.
Even after I go through the settings and check "Disable Automatic CAPTCHA" it still does it! This is a real buzzkill. I can't just sit at my computer for 10hrs typing this over and over again. It keeps interrupting the download.
Anyone know how to do away with it for good?
Disabling the automatic CAPTCHA will do the opposite of what you want. jDownloader can automatically fill in the CAPTCHA for you for some sites, which that option disables. For some sites, however, the CAPTCHA has to be entered by a human. If you don't want to have to enter the CAPTCHA, you're going to have to download from a place that doesn't use them.
A place such as...
Moth3r
This user is offline.
Better Grumpy than DopeyTV's Frink said:
Harmy (and some other fan editors) get some love on Wired:
http://www.wired.com/geekdad/2013/02/star-wars-fandom-editors/
Using my interpretation of the definition of a fan edit, Harmy (and Jambe) are not fan editors.
TV's Frink
This user is offline.
Ointment FlyOk, then *you* think of a term to encapsulate all of us. They did not create fan edits, but they are fans and editors. Ergo they are fan editors.
Or I could have said, "Preservationist Harmy (and a documentarian and some fan editors)," but that would have taken more time.
Anyway, cool stuff (ir)regardless.
timdiggerm
This user is offline.
Moth3r said:
TV's Frink said:
Harmy (and some other fan editors) get some love on Wired:
http://www.wired.com/geekdad/2013/02/star-wars-fandom-editors/
Using my interpretation of the definition of a fan edit, Harmy (and Jambe) are not fan editors.
Remember that, just like discussions of "personal canon", no one really cares about personal definitions.
Leonardo
This user is offline.
Joliet JakeYeah, but he's not editing the movie, is he? He's restoring it, preserving it. Ergo, not a fan edit.
... And they had 'The Empire Strikes Back', the fifth of the four Star Wars films. He is fucking with us numerically, isn't he! "Children, count up to ten." "Four, five, six, one, two, three, ten". No, it goes, four, five, six, one, two, three… No, it goes: four, five, six. One... Two and three have not been made." "Two and three have not been made! What should they be?" "What should they be? We do not know. All we know is that there will be a big floppy character in it that goes, squawk squawk squawk... who needs a punch up the bracket!"
doubleofive
This user is offline.
Chief Architect of Cynical MoralityI wasn't about to tell Nathan to not include Despecialized and Filmumentaries due to internal definitions. Though it did cross my mind.
Star Wars Revisited Wordpress / Google+ / Facebook / Twitter
Cinetropolis - My new movie blog home
Where to hear me online
Harmy
This user is offline.
Han D. SoloI think it's fine - editing by fans is taking place in both cases, so in general terms, you could call them both fan edits. Like when you take the DeEd, I am technically editing the SE.
Pennsylvania Jones said:
"Stick and Stones will break my bones but the Blu-Rays will never Harmy."
Lucas: I am altering the film. Pray I don't alter it any further.
Fans: This film is getting worse all the time!
TV's Frink
This user is offline.
Ointment FlyLeonardo said:
Yeah, but he's not editing the movie, is he? He's restoring it, preserving it. Ergo, not a fan edit.
This is a silly debate, but is he using an editing program? Ergo, I'm hungry for waffles.
TV's Frink
This user is offline.
Ointment FlyAlso, what Harmy said.
Moth3r
This user is offline.
Better Grumpy than DopeyHarmy said:
... Like when you take the DeEd, I am technically editing the SE.
Yes you are editing the SE - you are cutting out certain shots, for example.
But the role of the editor is much more than that. He/she selects and combines shots from the raw footage to guide the telling and pace of a story. In your case, the artistic decisions have already been made (and recognised with an Oscar) by the original editors, and you are attempting to replicate this version as close as possible.
I see this as very different to your Mike J Nichols or ADigitialMan taking the final cut as their raw footage and attempting to re-imagine the story.
TV's Frink said:
This is a silly debate,
This is irony.
Laserschwert
This user is offline.
I am ready for the trials!Well, "editing" is also the pure labor of actually assembling the footage. So it can also be completely independent from any creativity ;)
Stinky-Dinkins
This user is offline.
I program robots to blow me!We have less than 48 hours to iron out his official title. I'm putting in a huge order for his business cards Friday afternoon and I need to know what to put in italics underneath his name. When I did Frink's card order I put in Amazing Blowjob Lips.
EPISODES I - III ARE PILES OF SHIT
TV's Frink
This user is offline.
Ointment FlyStinky-Dinkins said:
Amazing Blowjob Lips
My band has been trying to think of a new name. Thanks!