George Lucas on Special effects and filmaking during making of ROTJ :: 1 > 2

  • Reply
  • Print
skyjedi2005's avatar
George Lucas on Special effects and filmaking during making of ROTJ

It is from The John Philip Peacher book,and seems to almost be about the prequels its quite bizarre.  Reminds me of the star wars to Jedi quote " a special effect without a story is a pretty boring thing".

 

"Special effects don't make the movie,and they are only important to tell the story and to give the characters credibility"

"if the Characters are not there or the acting isn't good, the movie will fall apart. It can't sustain itself. People think these are special effects movies. I would say the effects contribute  15 to 20 percent to the enjoyability, effectiveness, and popularity of the movie- At the most. Even in Star Wars

" If you start developing computerized backgrounds , hopefully that will be a way to bring down the cost. But in reality, if things are done right the films won't look any different than they do today. With these systems available, there will be a lot of filmakers moving in. You'll have tiny figures walking around in giant beautiful sets , which will be boring; the films will be a failure , and everybody will say 'Computer movies are not commercial'.

" The whole thing relies on the actors. I would say the acting and story are at least 75 percent of the film.  Just that.  If you can't get that 75 percent , if you don't have good performances and a good plot, you will never get the film to run on the 25 percent that is left. No matter how brilliant a director you are, how fantastic the special, effects, how beautifully it is photographed, how wonderful the music is, it will not work as a popular movie running at 25 percent."

 

Copyright 1983 Lucasfilm LTD and Del Rey books, quoted only for free use for education purposes.

 "Always loved Vader's wordless self sacrifice. Another shitty, clueless, revision like Greedo and young Anakin's ghost. What a fucking shame." -Simon Pegg.

Anchorhead's avatar
RE: George Lucas on Special effects and filmaking during making of ROTJ

Crazy!!   Lucas says one thing - and then goes out of his way to do the exact opposite.  Man, I sure didn't see that coming.

:-l

 

 

Crimson. Eleven. Delight. Petrichor.

Murry Sparkles' avatar
RE: George Lucas on Special effects and filmaking during making of ROTJ

This just proves what an asshole Lucas really is.

Alexrd's avatar
RE: George Lucas on Special effects and filmaking during making of ROTJ

What am I supposed to say here?

Filthy Pierre's avatar
RE: George Lucas on Special effects and filmaking during making of ROTJ

Alerd your right; what do you say that isn't in the first post?

 

 

Battle droids the robotic incarnations of Jar Jar Binks.

Bingowings' avatar
RE: George Lucas on Special effects and filmaking during making of ROTJ

There was as much story in the PT as there was in the OT, it could be argued that the story didn't make as much sense but it clearly was there.

I think the main criteria is does the special effect serve the story or is the story secondary to the display of effects.

In most of ANH and ESB the effects are just as much a story telling element as the sound, the music, the dialogue, the editing etc.

Lucas has always had a taste for whimsy but in ROTJ some of the story telling elements began to warp towards the display for display sake side and in the SE and PT the emphasis on what can be shown for it's own sake moved well beyond what needed to be shown to tell the story.

I'm with Harrison Ford in thinking that the opening shot of ANH is pure story telling with special effects.

It describes the whole in-film fictional universe in one unforgettable sequence and as unforgettable as it is it flows perfectly into that universe as well as being the ultimate primer for it.

  • Anál nathrach,
    orth’ bháis’s bethad,
    do chél dénmha
Anchorhead's avatar
RE: George Lucas on Special effects and filmaking during making of ROTJ

Murry Sparkles said:

This just proves what an asshole Lucas really is.

That was actually the very first thought I had.  He seems to love that he can be a dick and his devoted TFNers will still hang on his every word and buy every product he releases, no matter how poor the quality, or how many times he's already sold it to them.   It's as though he really enjoys gas lighting his followers.  By far, the strangest director\fan relationship I've ever seen.

Crimson. Eleven. Delight. Petrichor.

Fang Zei's avatar
RE: George Lucas on Special effects and filmaking during making of ROTJ

Y'know what one of the most amazing examples of visual effects I've ever seen is?

Zodiac

There's this scene where Mark Ruffalo is walking around a San Francisco crime scene at night, on some Haight-Ashbury-esque street.

Just about everything surrounding him, from the moving cars to the houses, was put in via cgi. I had absolutely no idea it was all fake until someone brought it up on a message board I frequent.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TT491ctM8Kk

I've been wanting to start a thread about this for a while, but this is proof that Dave Fincher (a former ILM-er!) would've been a perfect director for one of the prequels.

Baronlando's avatar
RE: George Lucas on Special effects and filmaking during making of ROTJ

Hey come on now, he's not an asshole. This situation with the original versions is more of a dick move. Anyway the reality is that he just doesn't have the same job he had in 1983 so his m.o. is different now. He quit making movies to sell trinkets and give ponderous interviews. Did you know that Joseph Campbell Mythology Genre Limitations of Technology?

Bingowings' avatar
RE: George Lucas on Special effects and filmaking during making of ROTJ

The Imperials have been given new orders, to capture the Falcon (not to destroy it or allow it to escape).

The fleet prior to that had been scattered to pick off the Rebels evacuating the base (we only see the first transport escape unscathed it doesn't follow that all of them did).

The aim is to knock out the hyperdrive (which they don't know isn't working) and to slow the ship down so it can be caught in the tractor beam of one of the capital ships.

The new orders and coupled with the prior orders make the sequence entirely consistent with the plot.

  • Anál nathrach,
    orth’ bháis’s bethad,
    do chél dénmha
Baronlando's avatar
RE: George Lucas on Special effects and filmaking during making of ROTJ

I think young Lucas was just talking about how the effects wouldn't mean jack if people didn't like Ford, Hamill and the gang, not the necessity of FX scenes, or lack thereof. This topic would come up a lot in that period, usually in the context of getting Lucas to distinguish Star Wars from Black Hole, Galactica, Star Trek I, Krull, Dragonslayer,  and everything else that came out in its wake.

Fang Zei's avatar
RE: George Lucas on Special effects and filmaking during making of ROTJ

Baronlando said:

This situation with the original versions is more of a dick move.

Agreed.

SE or no SE, good prequels or bad prequels, burying the originals is Lucas' biggest sin.

Bingowings' avatar
RE: George Lucas on Special effects and filmaking during making of ROTJ

I seem to recall Lucas mocking the tag line for Godzilla (1998) which was "Size Matters" by saying "Story Matters".

For all it's faults I find Godzilla (1998) a much more watchable film than any of the PT.

  • Anál nathrach,
    orth’ bháis’s bethad,
    do chél dénmha
OzoneSherrif's avatar
RE: George Lucas on Special effects and filmaking during making of ROTJ

Yep, even with Broderick as the star.

Murry Sparkles' avatar
RE: George Lucas on Special effects and filmaking during making of ROTJ

Bingowings said:

For all it's faults I find Godzilla (1998) a much more watchable film than any of the PT.

 +1

Bingowings' avatar
RE: George Lucas on Special effects and filmaking during making of ROTJ

Are you watching the same film ducks?

The command centre is providing cover for the escaping ships.

The Imperials cannot bombard the planet because of the shield generator so they land the space camels to take out the shield generator and ground troops to take out the the ion cannon which the being operated from the command centre.

Luke and his friends have to slow down the space camels to allow the Rebels enough time to evacuate as many people as possible, the command centre has to remain manned to provide cover for the evacuating Rebels.

We have no idea how many TIEs the fleet has or how many can be deployed from one ship (considering the relatively small amount deployed by a much larger number of capital ships in ROTJ I don't imagine they could send wave after wave) and how many were in pursuit but were not close enough to be seen?

The one thing we know is that the fleet which had been previously deployed attempting to shoot down Rebels over Hoth had been ordered to track, slow down and capture the Falcon but not destroy it.

If they fired too much and in the wrong place Vader would not be able to get what he wants, he either imagines or senses (depending on if you want to kick in the Leia sister retcon yet or not) a Skywalker on the ship and every Imperial officer and pilot knows what will happen if they accidentally got too good a shot in.

The action makes sense in terms of the story.

Why a beweaponed bounty hunter would get another bounty hunter, armed with a big space rifle to guide a robot, carrying poison bugs, to open a window with space lasers and hang around to deploy them to poison a senator and then allow a Jedi to hang onto the droid long enough to be spotted and then shoot the droid (not the Jedi) etc, etc, etc, makes no sense at all.

Last edited on February 6, 2011 at 11:50 PM by Bingowings

  • Anál nathrach,
    orth’ bháis’s bethad,
    do chél dénmha
bkev's avatar
RE: George Lucas on Special effects and filmaking during making of ROTJ


Anchorhead said:
:-l
 

My thoughts exactly.

Last edited on February 6, 2011 at 11:02 PM by bkev (Reason: )

xhonzi's avatar
RE: George Lucas on Special effects and filmaking during making of ROTJ

Murry Sparkles said:

Bingowings said:

For all it's faults I find Godzilla (1998) a much more watchable film than any of the PT.

 +1

 How sad and true.  :(

IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!

"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005

"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM

"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.

Rewrite the Prequels!

 

xhonzi's avatar
RE: George Lucas on Special effects and filmaking during making of ROTJ

Ghostbusters said:

skyjedi2005 said:

It is from The John Philip Peacher book,and seems to almost be about the prequels its quite bizarre.  Reminds me of the star wars to Jedi quote " a special effect without a story is a pretty boring thing".

 

"Special effects don't make the movie,and they are only important to tell the story and to give the characters credibility"

"if the Characters are not there or the acting isn't good, the movie will fall apart. It can't sustain itself. People think these are special effects movies. I would say the effects contribute  15 to 20 percent to the enjoyability, effectiveness, and popularity of the movie- At the most. Even in Star Wars

" If you start developing computerized backgrounds , hopefully that will be a way to bring down the cost. But in reality, if things are done right the films won't look any different than they do today. With these systems available, there will be a lot of filmakers moving in. You'll have tiny figures walking around in giant beautiful sets , which will be boring; the films will be a failure , and everybody will say 'Computer movies are not commercial'.

" The whole thing relies on the actors. I would say the acting and story are at least 75 percent of the film.  Just that.  If you can't get that 75 percent , if you don't have good performances and a good plot, you will never get the film to run on the 25 percent that is left. No matter how brilliant a director you are, how fantastic the special, effects, how beautifully it is photographed, how wonderful the music is, it will not work as a popular movie running at 25 percent."

 

Copyright 1983 Lucasfilm LTD and Del Rey books, quoted only for free use for education purposes.

This shows that George Lucas was once a genius. ...

I disagree somewhat.  I think his propensity for saying things like this is more or less unchanged since his early days.  He's always said the right thing.  He just can't seem to abide by his own rules, for some reason.  Listen to the commentary on the PT DVD's.  He has lots of good movie philosophy.  He just didn't apply it.

IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!

"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005

"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM

"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.

Rewrite the Prequels!

 

DuracellEnergizer's avatar
RE: George Lucas on Special effects and filmaking during making of ROTJ

twooffour said:

Did JANGO "TANGO-WITH-A-MANGO" FETT really have to be the main assassin? Or why did he have to fly off in the jetpack for everyone to see, insead of just hiding somewhere?

Fixed ... and then some =D

Last edited on February 7, 2011 at 9:57 PM by DuracellEnergizer

God doesn't think in terms of black or white - or even shades of gray - but in big, bright, bold hues of blue and orange.

Members reading this topic: None