Film->VHS Question

  • Reply
  • Print
AntcuFaalb's avatar
Film->VHS Question

In Film->NTSC_VHS conversions, is the film telecined (to get 29.970fps) and then interlaced? If so, would you deinterlace before or after IVTC'ing?

Wikipedia seems to indicate that all VHSs are interlaced, by design:

Each helical track contains a single field ('even' or 'odd' field, equivalent to half a frame) encoded as an analog raster scan, similar to analog TV broadcasts. The horizontal resolution is 170 lines per scanline, and the vertical resolution (the number of scanlines) is the same as the respective analog TV standard (576 for PAL or 486 for NTSC). In modern-day digital terminology, NTSC VHS is roughly equivalent to 333x480 pixels luma and 40x480 chroma resolutions (333x480 pixels=159,840 pixels or 0.16MP (1/6 of a MegaPixel)).[18], while PAL VHS offers the equivalent of about 335x576 pixels luma and 40x240 chroma (the vertical chroma resolution of PAL is limited by the PAL color delay line mechanism).

"And I'm shocked at you Moth3r for being off-topic, Because if people off-topic you say "stay on-topic, STAY on-topic, STAY ON-TOPIC", and we are not in the Off topic section of OT.com, now are we?" –pat man

"Look again." –Moth3r

"whouse erica,frank???!" –pat man 2

"Whouse youse, pam man?" –TV's Frink

"david.i dont get it,what is "whouse"??????" –pat man 2

"Do you even look at what you write in your own posts?" –Davnes007

pittrek's avatar
RE: Film->VHS Question

PAL VHS tapes are ALL interlaced. Not sure about NTSC unfortunately but I assume the same

Moth3r's avatar
RE: Film->VHS Question

No, no.

Read this: http://neuron2.net/LVG/interlacing.html

It's a little outdated, but the info is good.

Guidelines for post content and general behaviour: read announcement here

Max. allowable image sizes in signatures: reminder here 

AntcuFaalb's avatar
RE: Film->VHS Question

Thanks for the information, everyone!

Mavimao, you're right: my understanding of interlacing (at the time of the first post in this thread) was poor, at best. Now it's much better thanks to the information that both you and Moth3r provided.

My captures are raw (excluding TBCs, of course). I double-check the settings on all of my equipment and software prior to doing one to ensure that nothing fancy, e.g., noise reduction, is turned on. With each capture, I intend to take pictures and screenshots of the respective hardware and software settings involved so that someone with more experience can correct me if I do something in a suboptimal way.

"And I'm shocked at you Moth3r for being off-topic, Because if people off-topic you say "stay on-topic, STAY on-topic, STAY ON-TOPIC", and we are not in the Off topic section of OT.com, now are we?" –pat man

"Look again." –Moth3r

"whouse erica,frank???!" –pat man 2

"Whouse youse, pam man?" –TV's Frink

"david.i dont get it,what is "whouse"??????" –pat man 2

"Do you even look at what you write in your own posts?" –Davnes007

AntcuFaalb's avatar
RE: Film->VHS Question

I might just buy this book. The first edition contains the analog information that was removed for the second.

"And I'm shocked at you Moth3r for being off-topic, Because if people off-topic you say "stay on-topic, STAY on-topic, STAY ON-TOPIC", and we are not in the Off topic section of OT.com, now are we?" –pat man

"Look again." –Moth3r

"whouse erica,frank???!" –pat man 2

"Whouse youse, pam man?" –TV's Frink

"david.i dont get it,what is "whouse"??????" –pat man 2

"Do you even look at what you write in your own posts?" –Davnes007

Members reading this topic: None