Hello.

ABC said:

I'm sorry to announce you the user of this profile has been taken to the hospital due to a sudden heart attack.

- His wife.

^On-topic

Wow, my own train wreck thread!  How exciting.

Bingowings said:

Frink it was near the knuckle to post that item out of context on a non-joke thread (something that should only be done when as a preventative measure when a thread looks like it's about to go toxic...like another thread started to today or when it's clearly a wind up VHS 3d) and you said sorry and should have let this thread die. When I saw it pop up again I was rather disappointed.

Bingo, I appreciate your comments, and I agree I should not have posted in ABC's thread.  It's why I apologized there.  And so I'm clear, I have this to say to ABC:

I'm sorry I posted in your thread.  It was wrong for me to do so.  If you want me to remove my posts I will gladly do so, although I don't mind leaving them there either.  Otherwise I shouldn't have hit "post reply."

Having said that, I am not sorry for reviving this thread.  I've renamed it to make it a little less offensive (although I believe the original title was "factually correct").  However, in this off-topic setting, I see nothing wrong with posting examples of ABC's "ridiculousness."

ABC said:

You forgot to show the post before wich was at the origin of mine - Never forget the context:

The context is not important in this case.  Your joke about a heart attack crossed the line regardless of context, and you know this based on what a couple other people posted in your thread.

ABC said:

What you are doing taking witnesses among people (members) beeing totally unawared of the original context has a name: That's called DEFAMATION.

You've got a poor understanding of what DEFAMATION is.  I'm not going to bother explaining it to you, since you supposedly can't even grasp the concept of NSFW.

ABC said:

I think I'm going to ask the mods a little wash this time, if you don't want to study closer your misdeeds since 24 hours.

I don't follow your english here, but if you are saying you're going to complain to Moth3r, be my guest.  And good luck.

ABC said:

About the last few days, the thread is about... "whatever ABC wants", was in fact - and I knew it since the begining: the thread is about "how to stab ABC in the back". Perhaps you haven't see it coming but as I replyed in my thread, he was watching for me at the wrong turn.

You could not possibly be more wrong.  The idea of giving you control never occurred to me until bkev suggested it (not blaming bkev, btw, it was my decision alone).  I did it so I could spam "your" thread with fully clothed women and naked cats.  The idea of repostng your comment in your music thread honestly never crossed my mind until you posted it first.  But believe what you want.

ABC said:

I have no problem with Mr Frink. I just watch him hit the wind deploying his hunger trying to reach me for - well how many ? 4 or 5 "potentially NSFW" images I posted among 70 pages of his topic?... And they where always (but one) related to topic !

On or off topic has no bearing on the NSFW policy.  Also, it doesn't matter how many NSFW things you post, but rather you continue to do so after being asked specifically not to.

All that matters is that the pictures were potentially NSFW and you continually refuse to remove the pictures or admit you are doing anything wrong.  If they weren't potentially NSFW, Moth3r would not have removed them, rather he would have told me to grow up.  Hasn't happened yet.

ABC said:

It's been a while since I haven't, and the one quoted in the first post of this thread (wich was related to fire - the context !!!) is just a stupid and non-offensive heroic fantasy image. I actually think Frink was more offended by the ironical text wich accompagnied the picture...

Your last potentially NSFW post was one week ago, which I'd hardly classify as not being in a while.  And it doesn't matter if the image is stupid and "non-offensive" (debatable, by the way).  Again, if it wasn't potentially NSFW, Moth3r would not have removed it.

NSFW has been explained to you multiple times, and not just by me.  Your posts in this thread indicate that you either still don't understand NSFW (in which case, you're really stupid, though I don't believe that) or you pretend not to understand so you can justify your continuing to do it.

Not.  Safe.  For.  Work/Wife.  It's a simple concept.  By refusing to follow my wishes (and the forum guidelines), you continue to confirm my assertion.

You, sir, are a dick.

Respectfully Yours,
TV's Frink

vote_for_palpatine said:

FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT!

Ok then.

                                  ^vfp                               ^TVF

Nice try.  Threads are not deleted.  Best you can hope for is that the thread be locked.  If it so be, then so be it.

I honestly try to follow your English but sometimes your meaning escapes me.  Regarding defamation, you should show where I have stated a falsehood before you use that word.

There is another HUGE difference between you and me.  I have apologized.  You have not.  I have admitted wrongdoing.  You have not.  Consider how that looks to others.

ABC said:

TV's Frink said:

I honestly try to follow your English but sometimes your meaning escapes me.  Regarding defamation, you should show where I have stated a falsehood before you use that word.

The significance around here wich may be different than English is: to attack the somebody's image and/or honour.

You need to use a different word, then.  There is no defamation without a falsehood.

ABC said:

There is another HUGE difference between you and me.  I have apologized.  You have not.  I have admitted wrongdoing.  You have not.  Consider how that looks to others.

I waited for this one. I gave you my point once and I think I was honest enough to soften a lot the circumstances. It has had the opposite effects unfortunately.

In other words, you still haven't done anything wrong.

ABC said:

Anyway, that was my last post in the Off-Topic forum, so your thread is now fully potentially safe... If Davnes is wise enough !

Not sure why you are leaving off-topic or my thread, I never asked for that and don't see a reason for it.  But I'll believe it when I see it - you will post NSFW in my thread again, because you don't believe it is wrong.

ABC said:

My apologies still not, but my sincere regards for sure.

Whatever.

vote_for_palpatine said:

TV's Frink said:

                 ^vfp          ^TVF

 No way. I am much, much fatter than that.

                ^vfp                                        ^TVF

vote_for_palpatine said:

Getting warmer.

                ^TVF                                                       ^vfp

Cookies are always SFW

Davnes007 said:

Cookies are always SFW

Could see this coming a mile away.

ABC, guess what?  I'm not going to ask Dav to remove anything in this thread.  Know why?

IT'S TAGGED NSFW!

I don't mind NSFW pictures.  I just mind them in threads I've specifically asked them not to be in.

Why am I still trying to explain this?  I know you understand it.  And that's why I call you a dick.

^Why am I wearing hamburger headphones?

                       ^TVF                                               ^vfp

TV's Frink said:

^Why am I wearing hamburger headphones?

That's from the episode where Homer becomes an inventor. IMO**

** 'IMO' used pointlessly to point out how pointless it is to use in this situation.